|
Dispelling Funny Notions Re: Using "Funny Money" AKA FRNs
Six Reasons The Hershberger Raw Milk Case Is Central To Struggle For Food RIights, ..."
Date: 4/15/2014 2:08:28 AM ( 10 y ) ... viewed 8934 times "Most fortunately - the jurisdiction of the Congress is proprietarily dependent! In other words all of the jurisdiction that has been granted to the Congress is clearly limited by the written Organic Laws and restricted to those territories and other lands that are owned by the United States of America.
The commerce powers that were granted to the Congress are limited and most essentially to their proprietary-based jurisdiction.[4] It is unfortunate that the proprietary-based jurisdiction is not abundantly clear to the American people. However, the truth of the matter is no longer the 'big secret' that it has been up till just a number of years ago.
Therefore Vernon Hershberger and every American farmer (as well as all the rest of the people) are absolutely free to do business as it pleases them including the use of FRNs without fear of subjugating themselves and / or their business to governmental entities."
If you have any doubts about the above you now have the grand option of learning the Law for yourself. You can also visit the Organic Laws Institute and make your way to at least an initial contact with Ed Rivera and let him verify this directly for you!
In any case -
It's time to learn the Law![2]
At "The Complete Patient" site by David Gumpert I responded (with the first three paragraphs of this blog) to a comment that was made by one of the readers there.
***
January 6, 2018 -
"...Federal ownership of land may be (and usually is) merely proprietary--- meaning that the Federales are acting as property managers--- a role that does not create any exclusive use by the federal government and does not create federal subject matter jurisdiction.
This Ninth Circuit case ... addresses the issue of federal subject matter jurisdiction merely presumed to exist on the basis of federal property ownership.
In truth and in fact claims of Federal subject matter jurisdiction require: (1) a Federal use of the land (that is, a use related to the duties directly delegated to the federal government); (2) specific action by the State ceding jurisdiction. ..."
***
Notes:
[1] "Ammon Bundy Totally Vindicated and Now......" - by Anna Von Reitz:
http://www.paulstramer.net/2016/09/ammon-bundy-totally-vindicated-and-now.html
[2] http://organiclaws.org/
[3] http://www.paulstramer.net/2018/01/special-message-about-marijuana-law.html
[4] Additional limitations to the "commerce powers" are for the purpose of collecting taxes from the sale of alcohol, tobacco and firearms: "...the federal government was given explicit control over interstate commerce involving alcohol, tobacco and firearms (as sources of income supporting the federal government)".[3] No taxation powers were ever granted to the Congress over milk or other real foods.
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
| 
