Date:   10/18/2006 3:42:24 PM ( 19 y ago)
Hits:   2,722
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=756285

In my opinion, the scientific result of a test of any kind SHOULD NOT be open to interpretation by anyone. That's where dogma begins, I think.
'
For example: parasite TEST RESULT: STOOL : NEGATIVE [OR POSITIVE]
SPUTUM: NEGATIVE [OR POSITIVE]
BLOOD : ... and so on.

If a test yields POSITIVE, then perhaps an indication of the "organism(s)" observed could follow:

STOOL: POSITIVE - OVA/LARVAE

I mean, why not?

If the structures observed are 'ambiguous', then:

STOOL: INCONCLUSIVE - POSSIBLE OVA/LARVAE - FORMATIONS OBSERVED

followed by a brief discussion.

But I guess there's a lot going on at some level for them not to do it this way.
That is why I DO NOT trust any test that I can't repeat on my own, because ANYTHING can be written on a piece of paper.

If they're 'giving you the business', so to speak, then that in itself should raise a flag, don't you think?

Disturbing.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=756285