Re: Liver Stones and mercury/heavy metals

20 things toxicmetaltestimony blog accomplishes......


the following comes right off the blog, at the end of it....


The blog is admittedly a long read. Here is a summation of what it served to accomplish......and if a person wishes to see the blog it can be googled using the keyword, "toxicmetaltestimony", all one word.


1. The blog provided a compelling argument through numerous lab tests, clinical studies, abundant physical evidence and tragic life story of the effects of chronic mercury toxicity via chronic teeth grinding on mercury Amalgam fillings, leading to severe Liver Stone Disease.


2. The blog has served to validate the usefullness of the DMPS urine tests done by Doctors Data. In my case they did point to a significant problem with mercury, which was eventually corroborated by the excretion of the metal from the skin several years later. With this in mind, the tests should NOT be written off as not useful by the mainstream medical community.


3. The blog has shown that while DMPS can serve as an effective single use drug to pull heavy metals out of the body for the urine test, it can be too toxic for some people with liver or kidney issues when used for chelation treatment in the long run.


4. The blog proved that mercury can remain in the body for decades, wreaking havoc with it. This has been proven through the presence of the decades long mercury Amalgam tattoo, the consistent presence of high levels of mercury in DMPS urine tests over 17 years, leading ulitmately to the excretion of it through the skin - dispelling the lies of the mainstream medicine dogma that mercury doses not remain in the body for extended periods.


5. The blog served to show the connection between mercury and liver stones , by the fact that as it is being removed from the body through chelation with Humifulvate Complex (HFC), the numbers and sizes of the liver stones are decreasing.


6. The blog served to bring to public awareness and even the medical community in general of the reality of liver stones and the problems excessive numbers of them can create.


7. The blog served to prove that the Hulda Clark liver cleanse is a safe, non-surgical alternative to removing Liver Stones (and of course gall stones) from the body.


8. The blog served to prove that the Liver Stones removed by the Hulda Clark Liver Cleanse are real and not created by the cleanse itself.


9. The blog served to prove that the liver is capable of holding stones of very large size and numbers. This was done via "Intrahepatic Stone: A Clinical Study", covering the period 1957 - 1969. It was also proven through my own physical evidence, as well as referencing - videos on You Tube of stones removed by other people - these individuals providing corroborating evidence that Liver Stones are not such a rare condition as "medical science" claims.


10. Related to # 9 - the blog served to prove that the liver ducts, and sphincter of Oddi are capable of being very large in size, making it possible for large stones to be passed when the liver cleanse is done.


11. The blog served to bring greater public awareness or attention to the Hulda Clark liver cleanse for Liver Stone removal.


12. The blog served to prove that blood tests are not able to diagnose the presence of Liver Stones. This was seen when such tests were not able to find anything wrong with a woman with serious liver pain for 5 years. The tests failing even when her liver was congested with stones, to the point of surgical intervention.


13. The blog served to provide compelling evidence that standard bilirubin tests are not always accurate as an indicator of a liver in distress, since it is possible for these levels to fluctuate significantly between daytime and nightime (sleep).


14. The blog served to reveal the fraudulent claim of Ultrasound being able to see multiple Liver Stones, when in fact it only saw one stone, even when many were present in a woman with Liver Stone Disease.


15. Pertaining to point #14, the blog served to reveal the deceptive practice of the "medical science" community in presenting Ultrasound technology as effective for diagnosing Liver Stones TO the medical community in general.


16. The blog served to "indirectly indicate" apathy in the medical community pertaining to #14 and #15 since nothing has been done about either of those 2 points. KEEPING in mind the "Clinical Quiz" has been published online since 2002 - 12 years ago.


17. The blog served to highlight the UN-trustworthiness of some long held "medical truths". This pertains to Ultrasound and blood tests as accurate "first use" method or tools for diagnosis of Liver Stones. This UN-trustworthiness is also highlighted in the links pertaining to the issue of medical Science fraud.


18. The blog served to show that since blood tests and Ultrasound technology are unable to diagnose Liver Stone Disease, then it would be even more inept at diagnosing livers with large numbers of the stones, but not outright Liver Stone Disease.


19. Pertaining to #18, the blog served to "realistically suggest" that many thousands (10s, 100s?) of individuals in North America alone are likely suffering from livers congested with Liver Stones due to blood tests and Ultrasound not being able to indicate their presence. With this inability to diagnose Liver Stones then leading to various diseases - in large part due to the chronically toxic state caused by livers congested with stones.


20. The blog has served to introduce to the world 2 methods or techniques - the Self Adjusment Low Back Technique and the Handels Allergy Test - for relieving low back pain and pain in general.


I am not approaching this from a position of weakness or doubt, but of strength and certainty which comes from a great deal of experience.


If you are suffering from chronic pain, please read the blog. It will help you understand what is happening. Liver Stones and heavy metals are the 2 things that mainstream "medicine" is almost completely ignoring.....







Tweet