Huge mistake! By your own hand your veracity is forever in doubt

Since you have revealed your lack of veracity with your gaffe about my Yahoo group I will respond thusly:

If you knew anything about my Yahoo group you falsely claim to have surveyed you would know that it already is a private group and has been for over five years.  Each application for membership has to be approved and you can only read the posts there if you are a member.

Quite clearly, you assumed that since I invited someone to come join my group to check out the veracity of what I said that is was open to one and all and thus you wrongly made a false claim that you had looked at the posts in the group.  That is one huge gaffe, Hv and it should serve to put every claim you have made about me in doubt - as well it should, since most of them are equally false and misconstrued.

Your mistake is even more blatant than your previous false claim that you banned me from your forum because of my repeated pattern of causing trouble.  When I called you out on that claim and challenged you to present evidence of such a pattern (because the truth was that I had only ever made two posts in your forum), you made a weak revisionist attempt to say that you were talking about posts I made in other forums, which did not fly.

Your new false claim is akin to the mistake we see when attorneys who arrogantly ask a question they do not know the answer to and the actual answer and truth comes back to sabotage their case.  For ever more, whenever you start in with your false accusations and revisionist history crap and no matter how many links you posts or bullcrap claims you make, all I have to do is point to your blatant falsehood about looking at my group and posts I have made in my group and how you have torpedoed your veracity.

I will also add a comment about your contention that I cannot make a response without taking a shot at you.  I suppose you missed my last response to one of your posts before you came to this thread in typical Hv style and started in on me again:

Spot on, Hv - thanks for posting

where I thanked you for posting, gave you a good vote, and a good message alert (I see your message got an "R" rating, btw) - and did not utter a single negative word.  In fact, in the follow up posts I clearly indicated that I preferred to move on past our disagreements and try to get along.

So who is it that is predictable, cannot let go and keeps looking for opportunities to attack?  I would opine that person is the same person who is at the top of the list for number of forums they have been banned from and who has had scores of TOS violating attack messages deleted.  That would be the same person who has attacked CZ itself, attacked and challenged the WM and falsely whined that they never start attacks and are just the poor victim who is being unfairly treated and ganged up on.  That person would be YOU, Hv.