Re: no extremes, just common sense and honesty.

RE: If there is any evidence, beyond unverifiable testimonies, that this bleach product cures anything at all, inside the body, then please post it.

You see, this is an example of the problem right here. The one side(MMS Proponents) like to claim Miracle-Mineral-Supplement as a cure all to all ailments. While the other, calls for a lack of proof.

However the truth is in the details. ie. if we tailor the criteria for evidence to exclude all facets of evidence then we are being partial. And your opening statement is is just that.

By discounting personal testimonies and carefully wording prerequisite like "inside the body", you present a bias toward results. However, in reality, testimonies do count as evidence, and... we also have scientific evidence that Chlorine Dioxide works(see: chickens, water, food, etc.), and so there is a framework from which to establish that Miracle-Mineral-Supplement could likely work.

Therefore, given the conditions surrounding the use and effectiveness of Miracle-Mineral-Supplement , the problem is not whether or not it works, but rather, whether or not we can establish if it works under controlled testing.

As for the issue of credibility, there is a great deal of hypocrisy when it comes to testimonies and challenging them. ie. at what point do we conclude everyone are liars or mistaken based on educated guesses? Because this is what every argument I've seen toward the issue of MMS has been built-up on. Someone claims MMS works, they have zero credibility and we are expected to believe someone else who believes they are right. (think about it).

And the end-result is and ALWAYS will be the same. When the smoke clears, the users of the product stand their ground, while the anti-MMS(in this case) proponents retreat to their empirical proof clause. (what a waist of time).

Which brings me to my final point. Having put alot of thought on my own condition and experiences with MMS, I want to help other people like myself who might be suffering from the same problems without hope. However, there can be no good in standing-around arguing theories with internet(arm chair) chemists and professionals is there? No in fact, because the human mind seems drawn to deconstructive behavior. Call it the path of less resistance(whatever), but this is how we roll as a society.

And we know this(for a fact) based on our own medical history. To which I'd ask... how many people in history were laughed and ridiculed prior to making discoveries? How about too many to count!

And so where does this leave us really?
Well, on the one hand we have the claimants who subject themselves to the product and treatments. While on the other hand we have the skeptics calling the claimants liars or quacks based on their own beliefs. Both sides struggling to take control of the issue based on belief or testimony.

However, only one side(of the two) has anything to offer other than theory. Even if that means, they are bound by credibility. And that's a big issue if/when you think about it as the anti-MMS proponents would have us believe that they are somehow more credible than the MMS proponents.

It's a classic trap really.
A power struggle.
And just as I described it earlier. An unresolvable issue.

And even IF there were extensive studies for MMS. Don't kid yourself into thinking that this would spell the end for the anti-MMS brigade! - Because by now, everyone knows better. if the President of the Unite States can lie about his birth place, then you can be damned sure, that the MMS proponents can lie about their tests and results.

Oh what a tangled web we weave.
JohnB Tweet