CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Let's just agree that never the twain shall meet on some of our views
 
Hveragerthi Views: 2,571
Published: 13 y
 
This is a reply to # 1,768,978

Re: Let's just agree that never the twain shall meet on some of our views


 From the king of personal attacks , of course you would support a personal attack on DQ you've done so a multitude of times !

Thanks for proving my point of what I was pointing out about you.  Once again you did not post on topic, but instead chose to attack with misleading information to disrupt the boards.  The very important part you left out is that I NEVER attack anyone unless they attack me first.  This includes DQ (Tony)  who has attacked me relentlessly, hid my post that was not a violation of TOS but did show a contradiction in his claim, has recruited others in PMs to join in on the attacks against me, has started debate after debate then tried to play victim by blaming me over and over for all of his actions.  So you clearly have an agenda to come after me and disrupt the boards since you are failing to present the real facts and you are not presenting any on topic useful information.

And complaints against you are a regular event especially in the liver gallbladder debate forum where some have asked that forum owners with a conflict of interests be banned! I completely agree!

That is because the "liver flush" supporters treat "liver flushing" like a religion and people don't like being shown their God is a false God.  I have presented PROOF that the so-called "liver flushing" is bogus so many times and people hate me for it.  It is that simple.  Other people have also proven these flushes were bogus and were also met with constant personal attacks.  But unlike most of the people the zealots ran off I have held my ground.  And since these zealots have found that they have not been successful running me off with their TOS violating attacks they are now resorting to a new tactic, which is to try and ban anyone opposing them from this forum.

Why even bother having a "liver flush" debate forum if they want total domination and censorship so no evidence of the quackery can be presented?  They should have a "Liver Flush Cult Support Forum" where only true believers of the almighty Gallstone God are allowed.

Otherwise they need to leave people with opposing views alone, especially when they are presenting solid evidence to back their views.  Again this is a debate forum, not a you can only post if you believe in the almighty Gallstone God forum.  So you are going to have opposing views here and evidence presented that "liver flushing" is bogus.  That does not give license to the pro "liver flushing" zealots to attack other posters relentlessly and to censor anyone invalidating their "liver flush" religion.

As for your conflict of interest statement I have asked what conflict of interest and yet never got any type of response showing evidence of a conflict of interest.  So the translation of what you are saying is to ban me even though you can show no conflict of interest but allow any forum owners who support this quackery to remain.  Subtle censorship to keep the truth from coming out!!!


I wonder why you can't let your cut and paste government articles speak for themselves

Who said all or even most of my articles are from the government?  Let me teach you a simple concept Ryan that I think even you can understand.  Medline, which is one of the sources I post a lot of abstracts from is merely a bank of research articles is government run.  But the abstracts, which include a lot of pro-alternative medicine abstracts are not all government funded studies.  In fact the majority are not.  So your claim is simply another poor excuse and attempt to discredit everything that opposes your narrow little inside the microscopic box views.  Get out of that microscopic box Ryan, there is a whole world of real learning available to you!!!

instead of attacking everyone who disagrees with you?

LOL!!!!   I see you set a great example by attacking not only myself but so many others that have proven you wrong time and time again on other boards.  Again you need to get out of that box Ryan and grasp the concept that I only attack back if attacked first.  People like DQ are not victims, they are antagonists who people fight back at because their victims get tired of these antagonists lying about them and their other games.

 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.125 sec, (3)