Dear Desperado,

thanks for the interesting news about the lab result.
However, from what you say I am inclined to say that the lab simply put the stones under a microscope and judged their structure. They missed the cristalline structure typical for gall stones or liver stones .
It is for me not quite clear whether this lab also perfomed a chemical analyses, because you mentioned only your stones were made of an "oily substance".

Cholesterol - the main compound of gall stones from the liver - is also an "oily substance".

Today, I performed Liver-Flush 22. No stones, nothing. Liver-Flush number 12 in contrast, produced 2.400 stones of a very dark colour and later flushes yielded semi calcified stones. Not a hard as a stone from the garden but hard enough not to be divided without using a knife.

I am tense to hearing more of the method used by you lab.

Blessings

I would definitely ask for my money back on those results. They may have told you what they didn't find (nidus), but they didn't tell you anything about what the stones did consist of. I looked up amorphous and it just means lacking shape or form. Miscellaneous...well what are the miscellaneous materials? That's what you sent them there to find out.