"It seems that this debate forum is losing it's edge. SS at least kept things lively, right? So, let's tolerate his answers. Even I won't mock him (actually, I never did as far as I know). Everyone's opinion is sacred."

****I'm not sure what you mean here by "let's tolerate his answers." If you mean that we shouldn't laugh at his posts when his posts are over the top laughable, that's hardly keeping things lively, is it? A big part of the reason why SS kept things lively was because we were also free to laugh at his posts when we saw fit. Finding something laughable is also an opinion as *sacred* as any that ss might offer. So if you wish to defend ss's right to air his views, then you should as vigorously champion our right to laugh if we genuinely find some of his views laughable. I do not believe in selective censorship. Through this free-flowing communication, ss actually didn't come out looking too bad, for he always got a lot of attention, and i think us "laughers" all developped some fondness for his zany craziness.
For these reasons, when all is said and done, personally i also prefer the pre-banned ss, to the post-banned ss, even though i do understand why he had been banned in the first place.
Btw, if ss has indeed changed, it's precisely because he had been banned recently, not because of our "mocking" him, and "not tolerating his answers."

ss's own words below.
((I probably won't be posting on this forum because I think I'm probably hanging by a thread here on Curezone -- and I don't know exactly how thin that thread is!))

So if you want the old ss back, i think you should take it up with the curezone moderators.