I know what you mean, how very unbiased don't you think? HA

I do, for one.

I don't mark my own, though, so if one of mine is marked, another forum editor did it. (I may be arrogant, but it's more satisfying to know that someone else thought to recommend something.) I don't think I have many in this forum marked, and most of the editors at CureZone prefer to avoid the Debate Forums altogether, so in general, the one's marked "Recommended" in this forum are recommended by me. But we just took on another editor who may or may not introduce himself to y'all, who is also a regular in this forum, so you might see some more marked recommendations. I guarantee you, however, that it'll be similar "left" posts which he marks.

Guys, this is a web site dedicated to alternatives. If the status quo were as worthwhile as you seem to think, we wouldn't need websites such as this to promote the truth about the medical industry.

Who do you think is in charge of the medical industry? Who do you think creates and enforces the laws that send our courageous natural healers or alternative healers to jail for daring to heal someone using "unauthorized" techniques?

It's the same US government that: protects companies from liability for their damaging vaccines; actively jails and prosecutes doctors who use techniques such as ozone therapy or herbs; seeks to keep consumers in the dark about what exactly is in the food supply, by making legal definitions for "organic" which still contain non-organically grown products; legalizes patentable drugs and food additives knowing full well their dangers and actively suppressing the research which shows it; etc., etc., etc.

These are the facets of the US Government upon which the bulk of CureZone's visitors have direct experience and generally agree.

What makes you think that the other areas of government are somehow unaffected by financial influence?

It would be a lot easier to believe in George if he were actually doing things to take care of America, like increase truth in government, eliminate the agencies which persecute alternative healers, protect consumers and our environment, clean up our vaccine supply, etc., etc., etc. But he does none of these things.

So what reason do I have to trust him? Answer: none.

Now, what do all of these criticisms have in common? Worship of the Almighty Dollar. I have yet to see anything occur in our government at the hands of the Bush adminstration which isn't a demonstration of money worship. Actions speak volumes. Until I actually see George do something which is not in some way yet another demonstration of his real affections of worship -- $$$ -- I have no reason to assume that this war isn't also predicated upon money worship.

So... I give my recommendations to things which value human life, which value my fellow beings, which value this planet, which explain well what is going on. As soon as you pro-war posters give an article which makes me go "Hmmmm", I'll certainly recommend it.

But so long as the best you can come up with is accusations about anti-Americanness, allegations about the intents of the founding fathers (without one certifiable quote to demonstrate it, despite dozens I've provided in links), apologies for American history which you've never studied (or you choose to ignore) and which demonstrate a clear, obvious, blatant pattern of abuses against its own citizens, let alone the rest of the world... well, you won't get any support from me.

But there are other editors here... maybe you can convince one of them to agree with you, if you can convince one to wade through here into this morass of venom. I don't remove recommendation flags, either, so once one of us recommends something, it stays that way, even if I don't personally agree with it.

=-John-=

...alot to COMMON SENSE just like ALL the recommended messages throughout the ENTIRE SITE. I'm sure the QuackWatch boys think all the 'R' messages are a left, right thing too because it doesn't fit their false beliefs either. Labeling is so much easier to help defer a reality crash in a protected state.
A state I call the "ostrich syndrome." (how's that for a label)

Oh I can hear it now, "they're right about everything else BUT politics." *chuckle*