beloved1,
When I said weak, I said it because they don't have the 4 enzymes needed to NOT be oxidized. You are right, the cells "are aggressive and virile". Without the 4 enzymes, they can easily be killed, and with using ozone, can be done without hurting, but actually helping the healthy cells. What I'm saying is cancer cells have a big hole in their armor. They may be strong and aggressive, but can easily be killed.
I did and do say "any cancer, all the time", but I also said IF you can get the ozone to the tumor in a large enough amount. Some tumors are hard to get to, and you have to kill a few more than are being produced to win the battle.
The problem I see is you only read the first part of what I say, and write it off as false, and don't read or maybe remember the part that explains why I say it.
Yes Clark, Gerson, and Kelly have had failures, and yes there are failures with ozone. Clark is on the right track, in that toxins are a BIG cause for cancer. Gerson fails because nutrition isn't the only thing needed to cure cancer, it doesn't attack the tumors. I think Kelly is into nutrition too, but not to sure, but if he is, his problem is the same as Gersons.
The failures in ozone are the reason I gave you that are needed to cure the cancer, either not getting to the tumor, or not in large enough amounts. Ozone is not a fast cure, or an easy one if you have to apply it to the skin. The ozone rash can be really hard to bare. The determined that apply it properly win though.
The winning formula for beating cancer is like changing the oil in your car. Remove the bad oil, (toxins) change the filter, (doing cleanses) and putting good oil back in, (good nutrition, which can include several things). Ozone oxidizes the toxins, (all but 6 or 7) cleans the organs (still do the liver and bowel cleanses) gives the cells a good supply of oxygen, and boosts the immune system, which is broke in people with cancer. Toxins and or bad nutrition (when I say nutrition, that includes ozone) are always the cause for all disease. The cure is the opposite. There's not one disease you can't say that for. Really look into it.
You say you don't promote traditional treatments. Here's a quote "THeir focus should be on well-docmuentd and effective treatments from both traditional and natural disciplines." //www.curezone.org/forums/m.asp?f=254&i=2439
While what you say here is true about chemo, you still promote it, and say we'd be foolish not to use it. "Recent advances in advanced testicular cancer chemo have excellent results (just ask Lance Armstrong). A person with one of these cancers would be foolish to forgo standard treatment." //www.curezone.org/forums/m.asp?f=254&i=2356 I know you promoted it in other posts so...
I also wasn't "holding up Lance Armstrong" as proof for ozone. Someone else was talking to you about him, and I just backed up what he was saying.
You also keep claiming that people are "anonymous internet posters". What do you think we all are, including you? None of us know each other. I always give my email address to who ever, but you still don't know me. so...
Oh ya, in your other latest post about 2tuff, you're still judging him about his health info. by things that have nothing to do with health. Does that make sense? That's like me saying Lance Amrstrong is a bad dad because he rides bikes.
David, I totally agree with you on God. I'm Christian too. Non-Conventional, but Christian. I don't try to live longer because I love this life. I try to live the life God would want me to as long as I can, and promote God, and the things God gave us to live long healthy lives. When I die, I want to be able to go before God and say I gave it all I got, and have God smile at me. That is why I usually sit back and try not to interfere with what people say in here to much, but when I feel someone has been treated unjustly then I'm all over it! I usually don't get involved in things I'm not sure about in here, unless I have proof otherwise. I only ask the same from you brother. Remember, "judge not lest"? :-)
Take Care David,
Gaylen