As I predicted, the war is a bust

The war in Syria is probably not going to happen because people are not stupid enough to buy the B.S. anymore. As it is, It's definitely delayed until after September 9, and by then people will be sick of the subject. Doing it after that will be so politically unpopular that I seriously doubt it is going to happen at all.

 

After writing the article below this one, I read Fulford's latest report on this topic, and then wrote this new take on the subject. Both articles will remain up.

The Ninjas were RIGHT!

Jim Stone, September 3 2013

Permalink

Fukushima sabotaged again!

When I read about the 1,800 msv/hr readings from water out at Fukushima, I thought to myself, Impossible! And then, after hitting the Tepco web site I found out it was thousands of times worse than that In fact, the readings are so much worse that they are not possible given the scenario out there at all

Unlike Arnie Gundersen and ENE news, I am going to actually explain things here in a technical sense, to try to give you a way to grasp what has really happened during this latest round of sabotage out at Fukushima.

There are three forms of ionizing radiation - beta, alpha, and gamma. The reactors at Fukushima used and produced gamma radiation, and were poor producers of beta and alpha radiation relative to other types of nuclear reactors. This means that predominantly they produced gamma radiation.

Gamma radiation is the one that penetrates well. Gamma radiation will penetrate two feet of water without much of a problem. Beta and alpha radiation penetrate poorly, and can only penetrate a fraction of a millimeter of water.

 

The radiation readings taken by Tepco on that water spill were 1 msv an hour of gamma radiation, and gamma is what they are looking for because that is what their reactors produce. Yet once the probe was put within a few inches of the water spill, it measured 1,800 msv per hour of beta and alpha radiation, which cannot be measured from more than a couple feet of distance because even air blocks it. BECAUSE THE FUKU REACTORS PRODUCED GAMMA RADIATION, A BETA/ALPHA READING THAT HIGH IS NOT POSSIBLE UNLESS SOMEONE WENT OUT TO FUKUSHIMA, CAUSED THE LEAK, AND SABOTAGED THE WATER.

Let me explain with a little math to show you how bad the beta and alpha contamination really has to be to give a water surface reading of 1,800 msv an hour.

Beta and alpha radiation will penetrate approximately 1/10th of a millimeter of water. This means that any reading coming from water will only be what is being emitted by the top tenth of a millimeter. This means that virtually all beta and alpha radiation produced by a body of water can never get out of that water to be measured.

Gamma radiation will penetrate two feet of water. So if the puddle is two feet deep, you will be able to measure almost all the radiation being produced by that water.

How much worse than gamma radiation do alpha and beta radiation have to be to give the same msv/hour reading from water? Take 1 millimeter, and multiply it by 10. Then take the 25.4 millimeters per inch of water and multiply that by 10, because beta and alpha radiation won't penetrate much over 1/10th of a millimeter of water. So one inch will cut the reading by a factor of 254. Now you don't just have one inch of water to match gamma radiation's penetrating potential, you have 24 inches. So take that 254 and multiply it by 24 inches.

The math? Gamma radiation will penetrate water approximately 6096 times as well as beta and alpha will. So the actual radiological potential of the water spill out at Fukushima, if it was gamma rather than beta radiation, would not be 1,800 msv and hour, it would be 1,800x 6096, or 10,972,800 msv an hour.

Now let's do the final step of the math, to find the actual ratio of dissolved beta and alpha emitters to gamma radiation emitters in that water spill.

Since Tepco only measured 1 msv and hour of gamma off that water, (which is exactly plausible for the scenario and actually a really high reading by itself) and the beta and alpha readings were 1,800 msv and hour in relation to ONE msv an hour of gamma, you have to take 6096 and multiply it by 1,800 to get the ratio of gamma vs beta and alpha emitters in that water. Answer? That water is over ten million times as contaminated with beta and alpha emitters than it is with gamma emitters. AND I CALL BS ON THAT SCENARIO, WHICH HAPPENS TO BE REAL.

 

There is only ONE WAY that enormous a difference in alpha/beta radiation in relation to gamma radiation could possibly exist. And that is if solid waste material from a heavy water reactor was ground into the finest dust, then weaponized with water soluble solvents and dumped out at Fukushima.

And by far the most available heavy water reactor for Mossad front Magna BSP is in DIMONA ISRAEL.

Fukushima used LIGHT WATER REACTORS WHICH DO NOT PRODUCE EXCESSIVE BETA AND ALPHA EMITTERS. THEY COULD NOT POSSIBLY HAVE PRODUCED THAT WATER, IN FACT EVEN A HEAVY WATER REACTOR COULD NOT HAVE PRODUCED THAT WATER. THAT MUCH OF A CONTAMINATION RATIO DIFFERENCE IN WATER HAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH ADVANCED WEAPONIZATION METHODS, IT CANNOT HAPPEN EVEN FROM A MELT DOWN. AND I AM NOT TALKING BY A LITTLE, I AM SAYING THE RATIO OF BETA/ALPHA TO GAMMA IS OFF BY OVER TEN MILLION TO ONE. A FLAT IMPOSSIBILITY.

Far beyond any and all doubt, Fukushima is still being sabotaged. Most likely Israel was not happy with Japan's resilience and they sent in some mossad agents to cause the leak and contaminate it. I'd bet $50,000 that if the exact same water source was measured elsewhere in the facility, the beta/alpha/gamma ratio would be either equal with each other and not so far out of balance the way the spill water was, or the beta/alpha would measure less than gamma. Water is an equal opportunity solvent, it's not just going to burrow into a pile of melted fuel and leech out only the beta and alpha emitters, let alone at a ratio of several million to one. The ratio in the outside spill is NOT REALISTIC AT ALL, AND COULD ONLY BE FROM A SOURCE THAT WAS BROUGHT IN FROM ANOTHER PART OF THE WORLD.

How contaminated would water have to be to get a 1,800 msv/hr beta alpha reading? So contaminated that getting a single drop in your food would easily kill you And that is going to be really good for the ocean as far as an Israeli psy op goes, that particular reading is simply too high to be released in the environment without serious consequences.

AS bad as Fukushima was, it was not capable of doing this. To get that kind of contamination in water would require intentional work from a weapons department. I wonder what zionist ultimatum Japan failed to live up to?

Benjamin Fulford's "10,000 ninjas" said this was going to happen, and that Israel was indeed not happy with Japan's resistance to their threats, and that they would bring in extremely concentrated medical isotopes and further sabotage the environment out at Fukushima. Given these numbers provided by Tepco, I have ONE THING TO ASK: Who the hell does Ben Fulford know the ninjas were right.

 

Water leak actually not fear porn

The boiling ocean story may be a load of B.S., but I got the hard information about the water leak at Fukushima, and it is not pretty.

Thanks to Arnie Gundersen nuclear ignorance is running rampant. Now it is time for a little genuine nuclear education. The main problem is that after having reactors 1 and 2 explode because of the stuxnet virus (and steam explosions are very violent) the containment below the reactors was blown to pieces. These containments had a base of approximately 30 feet of borated concrete, which if left intact and not destroyed by a reactor pressure vessel explosion would have contained the cores and squelched their radiological potential with boron. But since they were blown away, an entirely different scenario evolved. Rather than having to melt through the borated concrete, which would have neutralized them, the cores flowed through the cracks and are now underneath the containments. And this has led to a serious problem.

The 1,800 msv/hr scenario is the less hazardous of two scenarios possible for people on the ground walking around, but by far the worst scenario possible as far as oceanic contamination, and the reason is a little complex.

Many people know enough about radiation to know that gamma radiation will penetrate anything for a large distance, and alpha and beta emitters are not hazardous if not eaten and cannot be read from a distance of more than a couple feet because beta and alpha have little penetrating power and therefore cannot be read from a distance the same way gamma radiation can be. However, this is a double edged sword of a problem here.

Alpha and beta radiation is super easy to underestimate because it has so little penetrating power that when it is in water, it will get blocked by the water it is in before it travels a fraction of a millimeter. If you can actually get an alpha or beta reading of 1,800 msv from a body of water, it is an insanely high level. Gamma radiation can penetrate over two feet of water. Since beta and alpha can only penetrate a fraction of a millimeter of water, well, I will do some estimated math for how bad the contamination of the water really is -

I will estimate that the alpha and beta radiation can penetrate 1/10th of a millimeter of water. This will vary based upon the situation, but it's a pretty good guess. Since an inch is 25.4 millimeters, and gamma radiation can penetrate approximately two feet of water, 24 inches times 25.4 millimeters = 609.6 millimeters. Since there is no way beta or alpha could penetrate even a millimeter of water, I am going with 1/10th of a millimeter. That is 6096 times LESS penetration potential than gamma radiation. Sounds reasonable. Now let's use that number for the final math.

 

To understand this, you have to think, it is actually a little complex

IF gamma radiation can penetrate two feet of water, it would mean that if the radiation reading on that water was 1,800 msv/hour of gamma radiation, then the water would be 6096 times less contaminated than the water would have to be to generate that same msv/hour radiation reading with beta and alpha radiation. If the reading off that water was 100 percent gamma, with beta and alpha substituted for Gamma, the actual radiation being released in that water would be equal to 1.8 sieverts times 6096, or 10,972 sieverts of equivalent radiological potential.

What does this mean? In real world terms, because beta and alpha are worse than gamma if eaten, it means that if you got so much as a single drop of that water in your food, you'd be DEAD. No if's or buts.

Though it is a reality, the scenario is not plausible. Tepco themselves released that figure. So you can bet it's a real figure. But the scenario does not support contamination of external water at that radiation level. Fulford claims that Mossad terrorists went into Fukushima and poisoned the water with medical isotopes, to give insanely high contamination readings. With a level THAT unrealistically high, I'd have to say I am suspicious myself that Fukushima may have been attacked yet again. If Magna BSP really hid what they did that well, or if Japan really does have a knife to it's throat with more reactors under threat from the Mossad, I'd say having Magna BSP further sabotage the facility would be the best possible explanation for how on earth ANY beta and alpha reading could be that high.

The types of reactors out at Fuku produce mostly gamma radiation, and the gamma radiation readings in the water are only 1 msv an hour. How on earth then could the beta and alpha contamination be 6096 x 1,800 times as much as the gamma readings absent willful sabotage from an outside source? Since water is an equal opportunity solvent, a second round of willful sabotage is the only plausible explanation.

 

Boiling ocean photo a load of B.S.

And it was good for the ratings

Jim Stone, September 2 2013

 

Permalink

Many of you have seen this "boiling ocean" at Fukushima photo by now, and it's a load of B.S. Natual News pulled this photo but it remains posted elsewhere in their name.

This actually angered me because I have no doubt this latest round of Fukushima fear mongering is explicitly to offset my latest round of Fukushima facts.

Let's go over some Fukushima FACTS.

The first thing to go over is the fact that if that fog was as advertised it would be there all day every day. You can't just switch on a nuclear disaster fog show and then turn it off. If the fog was in any way from the nuclear disaster, it would have to come from the reactors themselves and not the ocean, which is too far removed from the reactors to be heated by them absent functioning heat removal systems (which do not exist anymore) and then, any fog would be right at the heat exchangers because the ocean itself is too massive to heat up with a few billion watts. Even river based heat exchangers at places like Browns Ferry, (fukushima equivalents) rarely if ever kick up a fog. The photo is bogus, showing only natural fog which happens a lot in Japan.

 

Let's go over some Fukushima facts which HAVE TO BE HIDDEN FROM THE PUBLIC for Israel to avoid the death sentence outrage the truth would cause if people knew it.

1. Reactor 3's core was expelled.

This is easily proven by the blast photo to the left. The color of the blast matches the color of the reactor fuel. Since the entire facility was made out of white concrete, if that was concrete dust it would be white. The only place in the entire facility that had material the same color as the explosion was the reactor core. This means reactor 3's guts were blown out.

This so vastly exceeds the worst case disaster scenario parroted by the followers of nuclear liar Arnie Gundersen that anything stated since this blast about how bad things are, while denying this happened to begin with amounts to a propaganda comedy show. Fukushima not only surpasses Chernobyl, it makes Chernobyl look like an adventure park because the size of the reactors out at Fukushima are far beyond Chernobyl by a factor of approximately 20X. Chernobyl was childs play by comparison.

But it is Arnie's responsibility I guess to tell people a scenario which is plausible in a real nuclear disaster possible with the types of reactors out at Fuku, which could never explode the way Chernobyl did. The fact that reactor 3 had it's core expelled proves beyond any doubt that something else blew it up, it was not a nuclear failure that caused this

My big question is: Why did Natural News report the truth at first, only to subsequently take the topic down a rat hole?

 

2. Reactor 4 was similarly blown to smithereens when it had no core at all

This one is a no brainer folks. Reactor 4 had no core when it exploded,, and this is not only documented by witnesses out at Fukushima, Tepco's official records which have been proven accurate, and the report from the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission. This was also proven from the drone photos, which clearly show Reactor 4 correctly dis assembled for maintenance, with the core removed. Thanks to the blast, the truth was blown wide open - reactor 4 is the exact equivalent of building 7 on 9/11 - it could not have possibly been blown up absent a little assistance, delivered by Mossad front Israeli "security firm" Magna BSP.

 

3. Other nuclear facilities have been rigged with explosives

Sweden is now sitting on an Israeli nuclear threat. Someone managed to breach security at their largest nuclear facility and rig it with at least a full pallet of plastic explosives, and probably rigged it with more than a pallet. The fact that this was never made mainstream in the ziopress is intrinsic proof that the Israelis did this. And even the "alternative" media has avoided the topic of Sweden facing a Fukushima scenario like the plague, I have NEVER seen this reported anywhere else and I would like to know why. Perhaps because they don't think a news outlet in Michigan is accurate enough, while quoting an AP report? True, even the folks in Michigan downplayed this, but You cannot get a fist sized lump of plastic explosive without grabbing it from a larger batch, and the fact this was found in a forklift says it all. For the original report on this topic CLICK HERE

4. People died from radiation poisoning after reactor 3's core expulsion

But since this cannot be explained away by the mythical hydrogen blasts, Arnie won't say it. Ok, I 'll cut him some slack. Since he decided to profit from this issue from day one, and is as stupid as a box of rocks, he was going on the official story which talked about a whole lot of nothing and exaggerated it, and since he had his head in a hole in the ground he missed the real news - that people died out in the open at Fukushima after reactor 3 got it's core expelled. Good miss for a nuclear "expert". Now he can't live up to the fact or back track without people asking the obvious - HOW THE HELL DID HE MISS THE REAL NEWS ABOUT PEOPLE DYING all the while his illustrious ENE news yaks about a trio of "non lethal" partial melt downs?

 

5. The ongoing threat of Stuxnet, which destroyed reactors 1 and 2 remains an enormous issue

Stuxnet was originally likely written by Darpa and the CIA (not the NSA which does not deal with developing aggressive systems) for the purpose of destroying Iran's nuclear program. And it was specifically written to ONLY DESTROY NATANZ. It was then handed by some truthful idiots to the Israeli Defense Forces with their promise that they would do no re-programming to affect other systems. And the Israelis are truthfully even more stupid than the idiots who trusted them.

They sat down with Stuxnet and removed all the security features that prevented it from affecting more than Natanz. They then turned it into a regular virus that could spread via typical routes of infection. They also removed the safety features - the identifiers that allowed it to know if it was in Natanz or not. And then they let it go into the wild. I have no doubt Magna BSP hand delivered it to the Scada controllers inside Fukushima, laying in wait to affect the safety systems, but additionally it is now out in the wild and infecting every industrial system it comes in contact with. And it is now more than just a resident virus, it can also phone home and tell the Israelis what systems it has now infected, and await instructions for what to do. That works great for false flag industrial disasters

 

6. The seismographic evidence does not support a 9.0 earthquake, or anything near that magnitude thus proving the tsunami had to have been caused by nuclear weapons

It was hilarious when I discovered USGS seismologist Erol Kalkan's assessment of the Fukushima quake, (click to enlarge it) which showed 12.9G ground accelerations at station MYG004, which was 70 KM inland in Japan. Had that happened, Japan would have spawned a new mountain range. And he did it based upon seismograms that showed a peak richter intensity of 6.67. He just did what he was told I guess. And what was even more funny in a scientific sense is the fact that none of the stations at the shore, closest to the "epicenter" were used by good ol EROL because their readings were in the low Richter 5's.

I managed to get the seismograms Erol based his charts upon after days of calling and digging, and they blew his scam right open. Though a 9.0 was stated to have happened out in the ocean by the scamming ziopress, the real peak intensity was 6.67 inland at station MYG004 and NOT out in the ocean, thus proving the entire 9.0 story to be a bold faced lie. This was part of the original Fuku report, (click to enlarge it) On the ground in Japan, the evidence of Erol's forgery is everywhere. Highway overpasses that have been built to survive major quakes will fail with ground accelerations below 1 G yet none are damaged at all. Even the best built structures - the earthquake resistant skyscrapers will fail with ground accelerations below 1 G and in all of Sendai there were zero collapsed and zero leaning. Yet Erol reported 12.9 G's and the only thing that fell near that epicenter was an old welfare shelter. YEP, about what would happen in Japan with a 0.3G 6.67. Don't expect much else to fall.

Bottom line? I can show you the seismograms, which prove the quake was minor. Kalkan, spokesman for the USGS states himself the worst of the quake happened inland at station MYG004, and NOT out in the ocean which means the worst would have happened inland. CAN THE LIARS OUT THERE SHOW ME THE QUAKE DAMAGE THAT SHOWS IT WAS MAJOR? I am not talking tsunami damage which can be caused by nuclear weapons at the bottom of the ocean, I am talking REAL QUAKE DAMAGE OUTSIDE THE TSUNAMI ZONE, like what happened at Kobe? A little advice. GIVE UP. Beyond a 6.6 the quake DID NOT HAPPEN. And that 6.6 was 30 KM away from the nearest major city, Sendai, even according to the USGS once the lies are deciphered, which is why that 6.6 only destroyed a welfare shelter when the similar Kobe quake destroyed a whole lot more.

 

I have a little challenge for the Fuku scammers out there - If you want to refute what is on this web site, do it with official record.

I am not talking the lies in the ziopress or whatever fear porn someone has pumped up. I am asking you to dig deep and actually produce the hard to find stuff that proves your point. Do it with photographs that prove a 9.0. Do it with the real seismograms. Do it with a real explanation of the reactor systems, which shows all the safety valves that failed, all the passive cooling systems which require no electricity at all to function that you never mention, and THEN EXPLAIN HOW THE EARTHQUAKE COULD HAVE DESTROYED THE PIPES AT FUKUSHIMA, WHEN THE REACTOR SYSTEMS ALL WENT UP TO 3000 PSI, WHICH COULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED IF THE QUAKE DAMAGED ANYTHING AT ALL. If a quake had damaged Fukushima all affected systems would have had a pressure of ZERO while things melted down. BROKEN PIPES DESTROYED BY EARTHQUAKES EQUAL ZERO PRESSURE. How can the scammers out there count on the public being so stupid about this?

 

A call to concience: To everyone out there lying about Fukushima - WHAT ARE YOU WISHING FOR?

Are you hoping more nuclear facilities get destroyed by the Israelis because you think they are wise about it? Can you escape to zion? Do you really want to continue hiding the reality of Stuxnet and explosive laden nuclear facilities just to allow the zionists a venue of public ignorance to use in the next assault? Are you complicit in their crimes, or are you just stupid?

I know nuclear is a complex topic, but when it has been handed to you on a silver platter all cut up into bite sized pieces like what you can find on this site, which happens to be a major one, ignorance cannot be excused. And if you are the type that is too mechanically illiterate to change your own oil JUST LOOK AT REACTOR 4 AND EXPLAIN HOW THAT BLEW UP WHEN EVERYONE, EVEN THE INRC SAID IT WAS DIS ASSEMBLED AND THE DRONE PHOTOS PROVE IT?.

 

What ever happened to the Fukushima 50?

Jim Stone, August 30 2013

 

Permalink

Many of you may remember the group of workers called the Fukushima 50, who sacrificed their lives to do the initial cleanup out at Fukushima, a job so dangerous it killed 3 people and is considered to have destroyed the lives of those who survived. These were the people who went out to Fukushima to do the original damage asessment, only to find reactor 3's fuel laying around out in the open. These people alone prove the hydrogen blast myths to be the lies they were - hydrogen blasts could not possibly have caused a major expulsion of nuclear fuel from the inside of reactor 3.

The Fukushima 50 were good hearted people who gave their lives to save Japan from the disaster. Subsequent people went out to fukushima to finish the cleanup at a pay rate of around $300 dollars an hour, but the Fukushima 50 were the original heroes who were not expected to live long enough to enjoy any sort of pay at all. And the fact that the ziopress has expunged them from the history books is proof alone that Israel caused the disaster and wanted it swept under the rug ASAP.

I know I have taken a lot of heat on sites like Rense for saying reactor 3's guts got blown to the sky, all the while the likes of Arnie Gundersen say the problem is a little steam and leaking water. But there is plenty of proof remaining that I am absolutely right, and one of those proofs is the Fukushima 50. Another proof is the color of reactor 3's blast, which was an identical match to the color of the fuel inside the reactor. I'd like to know what turned that fuel into dust that could be carried on the wind if it was not a nuke, certainly only the shock wave from a nuke could have pulverized the core material and rendered it dust.

But the Fukushima 50 proved reactor 3's core expulsion to have been a reality, the types of steam leaks and water leaks Arnie and Rense and ENE news continuously harp about have radiation levels in the microsievert an hour range even if they are extremely severe. These radiation levels are never fatal, even if you are exposed to them for months on end because they contain no solid reactor fuel. And that is Arnie's job - to keep the Fuku disaster within the realm of what is possible with the "official" story, while harping up as much fear over the NOTHING the official story is as possible.

Reality is very different from what is on Rense, ENE, and out of the mouth of good ol Arnie

After reactor 3 was destroyed by a nuke, the areas surrounding it had solid reactor fuel laying out in the open and radiation was measured at 20 sieverts an hour OUTSIDE, IN THE OPEN, which is a radiation level so high that you would receive a lethal dose in under 15 minutes. And this did indeed happen out at Fukushima, the original assessment team died after they drove through the remains of reactor 3. They were probably the people who took that 20 sievert an hour reading. Their car was photographed from a drone during that fateful death drive and is in one of the photos included in the Fukushima report.

 

Ah yes, but it's all a myth, right? I am full of it, and it was only melt downs, with the real bad radiation remaining inside the containments, RIGHT?

Before thinking so, I suggest you peruse the following surviving links, if Fukushima had really been as stated in the ziopress, Rense and ENE included, these stories which were released before the media sanitizing efforts went into effect could never have happened:

RENSE AND OTHERS, GET OFF YOUR BEHINDS AND READ THIS STUFF. DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO THE FUKUSHIMA 50 WHITEWASHES THAT ARE BEING PUBLISHED NOW, READ WHAT WAS SAID AT THE TIME IT HAPPENED

Daily Mail: Five are believed to have already died and 15 others state the radiation will kill them Three died, and this article actually got a photo of a destroyed road. However, roads bite the dust at magnitude 5 and up. This article also states that reactor 3 caught fire and burned. This can only happen with an exposed core, as I have always stated from day one.

"They stayed behind while everyone else was sent nearly 15 miles away and radiation soars to menacing levels. "

Are the Fukushima 50 doomed to death?

These people were real, and as it turned out, they COULD NOT survive doing the cleanup. It ended up being done via REMOTE CONTROL