Absolutely agree with you.

I joined globalwarmingskeptics.info a while back to try to understand some of the mechanics of the theories that constitute CAGW. Very nice bunch of people and very concerned with the application of UN agenda 21.

interstingly the repeat of the woods experiment by nasif nahle shows the greenhouse effect is a false paradigm.
joe postma an astrophysicist elaborates on the GHE hypothesis (not theory) showing it to be a house of cards P/4 being an unphysical representation of reality - conforming to models is similar in a way to statistics in that they can say whatever you want them to say.

some useful links for any who are interested:

http://slayingtheskydragon.com/en/blog/175-carbon-dioxide-not-a-well-mixed-ga...


http://climateofsophistry.com/


http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/greenhouse-effect-of-co2-already....


http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/how-ipcc-fools-everyone-that-co2-...


http://notrickszone.com/2012/12/01/permafrost-far-more-stable-than-claimed-ge...


http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/


http://principia-scientific.org/



apologies for the long list but hopefully some might find it of interest, use and importance since global policy is principally being shaped by this agenda!