If you search back through the posts you will find many heated discussions. Many of us have diligently researched vaccines for well over 2 years or more and this past year has revealed many truths that confirm the dangers of vaccinations.
Recently, the world was informed of the rampant fraud of the pharmaceuticals with admitted cover ups and manipulation of data. They knew the dangers of vaccines but hid the information. You can go to the CDC website and read the data presented by the top researchers and scientists on how the vaccines are mutating into deadly viruses that are causing diseases in vaccinated people. Read the vaccine product inserts on what is contained in the vaccines and the warnings to people prone to brain reactions such as convulsions and paralysis.
Have you ever read the VAERS report for Gardasil vaccines? The CDC does not consider spontaneous abortion or seizures caused from vaccines as critical. A reaction is minor as long as a person can stand up and walk out of the hospital. Only death and total incapacitation is listed as severe.
Those in the medical field will defend vaccines and here is why. You remember when the news broke world wide that Catholic priests were molesting children? The first printed response from the Catholic priesthood was, “We are not worried because we still have lots of power.” Not one comment was made concerning the horrific abuse to another human being. All they were worried about was maintaining power.
When a Doctor puts on his white coat he has lots of power over his patient. At this point in time, the Doctors are more concerned with the power and status they wield over their patients than any damage by medical treatments.
Of course, with power comes money so everyone invested in Big Pharma can benefit from the multi-billion dollar industry.
We are here to inform you so you can take your power back. Become informed and make your own decisions.
Right from the CDC website:
The ACIP uses VAERS reports to determine the safety of Vaccines:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6041a4.htm
Safety of Tdap in Pregnant Women
In prelicensure evaluations, the safety of administering a booster dose of Tdap to pregnant women was not studied. Because information on use of Tdap in pregnant women was lacking, both manufacturers of Tdap established pregnancy registries to collect information and pregnancy outcomes from pregnant women vaccinated with Tdap. Data on the safety of administering Tdap to pregnant women are now available.
ACIP reviewed published and unpublished data from VAERS,
Sanofi Pasteur (Adacel) and GlaxoSmithKline (Boostrix) pregnancy registries, and small studies (7,8). ACIP concluded that available data from these studies did not suggest any elevated frequency or unusual patterns of adverse events in pregnant women who received Tdap and that the few serious adverse events reported were unlikely to have been caused by the vaccine. Both tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) and tetanus toxoid vaccines have been used extensively in pregnant women worldwide to prevent neonatal tetanus. Tetanus- and diphtheria-toxoid containing vaccines administered during pregnancy have not been shown to be teratogenic (9,10). From a safety perspective, ACIP concluded that administration of Tdap after 20 weeks' gestation is preferred to minimize the risk for any low-frequency adverse event and the possibility that any spurious association might appear causative.
The Most Recent Recomendation for the Flu Shot in the 2012 Season includes investigation of VAERS reports for any allergic reactions to eggs.
Recent examination of VAERS data indicated no disproportionate reporting of allergy or anaphylaxis after influenza vaccination during the 2011–12 season (21). For the 2012–13 influenza season, ACIP recommends the following:
1. Persons with a history of egg allergy who have experienced only hives after exposure to egg should receive influenza vaccine, with the following additional safety measures (Figure 2):
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6132a3.htm
What is the ACIP? Experts in the following areas:
he ACIP nominally contains fifteen regular members, each an expert in one of the following fields:[5]
In addition, the ACIP includes ex-officio members from Federal agencies involved with vaccine issues, and non-voting liaison representatives from medical and professional societies and organizations.[7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advisory_Committee_on_Immunization_Practices
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6041a4.htm
VAERS is used widely by the CDC, FDA and ACIP.
In fact, VAERS reporting is mandated by The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. "The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act requires health-care providers and vaccine manufacturers to report to VAERS specific adverse events that occur after vaccination."
There are over 28,000 VAERS reports yearly. (You are much more likely to know someone who is vaccine damaged than someone who has a disease.)
Only 10 percent of the VAERS reports are from the patients.
65% of VAERS comes from Healthcare Providers and Vaccine Manufacturers
"Healthcare providers are encouraged to report to VAERS any clinically significant adverse events after immunization. From 2006 through 2010, US VAERS reports were received from healthcare providers (34.8%), manufacturers (26.1%), unknown or other reporters (24.5 %), patients or parents (10.3%), and state and local health departments (4.4%)".
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/safety.pdf
How are Vaccines Monitored?
The CDC and FDA have been closely checking the safety of HPV vaccines through 3 monitoring systems.
* The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)–an early warning public health system that helps CDC and FDA detect possible side effects or adverse events following vaccination.
* The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) –a collaboration between CDC and 10 health care organizations which monitors and evaluates adverse events following vaccination. Data are available each year from approximately 9.8 million people.
* The Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network– a collaboration between CDC and medical research centers in the U.S. which conduct research on adverse events that might be caused by vaccines.
"Reporting adverse events, including serious events, to VAERS is a key mechanism for identifying potential vaccine safety concerns."
Here is just one example of how VAERS reports are used for trending side effects:
ACIP Vaccine recommendations for HPV
Syncope (Fainting) Following Vaccination
□
An increase in the number of reports of syncope has been detected by the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
□
11-18 year old females have contributed most of the increase
□
Serious injuries have resulted
□
Providers should strongly consider observing patients for 15 minutes after they are vaccinated
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/10-HPV.pdf
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
In the list below, the CDC all but admits vaccines impair the immune system and cause underlying diseases to surface:
Vaccine adverse events can be classified as follows:
■ Vaccine-induced: Due to the intrinsic characteristic of the vaccine preparation and the individual response of the vaccinee. These events would not have occurred without vaccination (e.g., vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis after oral polio vaccine).
■ Vaccine-potentiated: "The event would have occurred anyway, but was precipitated by the vaccination (e.g., first febrile seizure in a predisposed child)."
■ Programmatic error: "Due to technical errors in vaccine storage, preparation, handling, or administration."
■ Coincidental: "The reported event was not caused by vaccination but happened by chance occurrence or due to underlying illness."
www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/safety.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/safety.pdf
Via: TechNet21:
An anti-vaccine surveillance and alert system
Seth Kalichman of the http://www.uconn.edu/ in the USA will establish an Internet-based global monitoring and rapid alert system for finding, analysing, and counteracting communication campaigns containing misinformation regarding vaccines to support global immunization efforts.
…
On-demand vaccine delivery via low-cost unmanned aerial vehicles
George Barbastathis of the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology in the USA will lead a team to develop unmanned aerial vehicles that can be deployed by health care workers via cell phones to swiftly transport vaccines to rural locations and alleviate last-mile delivery problems and improve cost, quality, and coverage of vaccine supplies.
Walter, what I find interesting about the Vaccine Injury Table is something most proponents of vaccines/vaccinations probably are not aware and it is “The Table lists and explains injuries/conditions that are presumed to be caused by vaccines.” [1] So, in effect, HHS/CDC/FDA agree vaccines can cause damage. I suggest every parent becomes familiar with the Vaccine Injury Table in the link at reference [1].
The Table is per se inadequate and a mother or father should follow their gut instinct when faced with a vaccine reaction most of which are probably not on the Vaccine Injury Table. Currently there are laboratory-testing methods developed, but withheld from diagnostic use by FDA that can quickly and cheaply link reactions to vaccines. I do not feel anyone should subject their child to an immunization unless faced with an actual, not a CDC forecast, epidemic of a life-threatening pathogen. That is, until those testing procedures are made available to the general public for diagnostic evaluations of both the injured and of the vaccines which are administered.
I am not anti-vaccine but strongly oppose FDA/CDC/NIH B.S. (rhetoric and hyperbole) when it comes to evaluation of vaccine reactions. For example: Dr. Jonas Salk, developer of the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) gave unchallenged testimony before the Senate Committee establishing the Vaccine Injury Table that there had been no paralytic reactions to the Salk vaccine in 450,000,000 doses resulting in a Table that provided no compensation for IPV-caused polio. The FDA stood by and said absolutely nothing, but had good reason to know Salk’s testimony was not true. Really!
Salk had provided expert assistance and consultation to me for 12 years while the ongoing feud between Sabin and Salk brewed over which vaccine should be used in the United States.
When the Chief Special Master appointed me to head an Attorneys Committee to investigate the possibility that Salk’s vaccine had caused hundreds of cases of polio that had never been linked to the vaccine by FDA, I truly believed that Salk’s vaccine had never caused polio except in one isolated manufacturing problem in 1955.
After the Committee investigated and discovered that not only had Salk’s IPV caused polio, it had probably started epidemics, and the famous “Frances Field Trials,” which the FDA’s predecessor touted as proving IPV’s absolute safety, were “rigged” and probably caused as much polio as they prevented.
There have been reports from epidemiological studies confirming suspicions that those who are vaccinated often don't do as well with long-term health as those who are vaccination free.
Those epidemiological studies (statistical surveys) have shown that bad health is more common among the vaccinated who survive without serious injury than children not vaccinated.
But how and why has not come under controlled animal lab studies until Japan's Kobe University animal lab study of 2009.
This study was reported and peer reviewed in the PLOS One Open Journal at the end of 2009, but has not received much if any public attention. It was brought to public's attention very recently by homoeopathist and health writer Heidi Stevenson's article on her Gaia Health blog. (Source below)
Here's the conclusion quoted from the
Kobe Universitystudy's journal report:
"Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the
inevitable consequenceof over-stimulating the host's immune 'system' by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organize criticality." (Emphasis added.)
The initial purpose of this independently funded study was to understand how autoimmune diseases develop from autoimmunity. It was not an effort to prove vaccination safety or danger.
The researchers used mice that were bred to avoid autoimmune diseases and injected them with solutions that contain antigens. Antigens generate antibodies to protect against invading disease pathogens. Antibodies can turn against the host if they become self generated, causing autoimmune diseases.
A
vaccinationinjects cultured vaccine antigens of weakened or dead viruses to create an immune response of antibodies to that antigen, supposedly for creating immunity to that particular disease.
It's not very unusual for cytokine storms (
immune systemoverreactions) to overwhelm one who has been vaccinated. Vaccine adverse reactions have caused injuries of permanent disability, autism spectrum disorders, or death more often than publicly disclosed.
The Kobe researchers injected the mice that were bred to not develop autoimmune diseases repeatedly with antigens, much like vaccinations are administered to infants and children, to
studyhow an immune system could turn on itself to create autoimmune diseases.
They were pushing the mice's immune systems to see if and when they would no longer bend, but break. They used
Staphylococcus entertoxin B(SEB) as their injected antigens.
such as mercury, aluminum, or formaldehyde used in vaccines. Antigens were used without the toxic additives normally used in vaccinations.
After seven injections the mice recovered each time with their immune systems intact. But after the eighth injection, problems with key immunity cells began arising.
Damaged cells were observed microscopically and showed signs of early autoimmunity. Their immune systems had started to self generate antibodies for autoimmune reactions after repeated antigen inoculations. (Source below)
This study should put to rest the notion that "greening" vaccines, that is removing or withholding vaccines' normal toxic additives, would make the childhood vaccination schedule of close to 40 vaccinations by 18 months of age more agreeable.
The Kobe animal trials demonstrated how autoimmune reactions were created as a consequence of repeated antigen
onlyinoculations with long enough breaks between each injection to allow complete recoveries.
Autoimmune diseases have increased in quantity and variety as childhood vaccination schedules increased and more vaccines were made available for naive recipients. Even infectious diseases that vaccines are supposed to immunize against have appeared among the vaccinated more often than publicly admitted.
The very basis of creating immunity with even "greened" vaccinations is worse than false, it is actually unhealthy.
Heidi's article:
http://gaia-health.comThe Japanese study's journal report:
http://www.plosone.orgAntigens explained:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AntigenRecommended vaccination schedule for children to age six:
http://aapredbook.aappublications.orgYou left out:
Feeble atempts by mainstream apologists which have been thoroughly discredited and beaten back time after time.