I see a particular poster with a history of trying to bait people in to debates so he can attack them is trying to bait me in another forum. I mentioned the half life of mercury being only a few months and of course immediately afterword he posts a link to a Mercola article claiming the half life is between 15-30 years.
This would not be the first time Mercola has been discredited over his claims. People can run a search for "Mercola" on this forum to find some examples.
One thing that Mercola is once again overlooking is the fact that many compounds in the average diet such as phytates, alginates and pectins all bind heavy metals. Since most mercury is going to be released upon chewing this also means that most of it will be bound by these compounds during the chewing and thus not absorbed but rather bound and eliminated from the body.
Mercola's article claims "The average individual has eight amalgam fillings and could absorb up to 120 micrograms of mercury per day from their amalgams"
So what does the actual research say":
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17767927
Blood and urine mercury levels in adult amalgam patients of a randomized controlled trial: interaction of Hg species in erythrocytes.
"The integrated daily Hg dose absorbed from amalgam was estimated up to 3 microg for an average number of fillings and at 7.4 for a high amalgam load"
There is a massive difference between the 7.4 micrograms the researchers found even for a high load of amalgams and the 120 micrograms Mercola hyped up for the article.
And what did this abstract say about the excretion rate of mercury?:
" It was the aim (1) to investigate the internal exposure to amalgam-related mercury from the kinetics of inorganic Hg in plasma and erythrocytes after amalgam removal, and (2) to estimate the amalgam-related absorbed dose. Dietary coexposure was monitored by determination of blood organic-Hg. Postremoval steady-state Hg concentrations were measured for 18 months. Eighty-two patients had been randomized into three groups: (A) removal of the fillings; (B) removal and non-specific detoxification, and (C) a health promotion program without removal. After amalgam removal, inorganic Hg dropped rapidly in plasma and red cells, stabilizing at 27% of preremoval levels after 60 days. Concentrations of organic Hg in plasma remained unchanged, indicating no change in dietary uptake of organic Hg."
Wow, dropped that much in 60 days!!! That is a far cry from 15-30 years claimed by Mercola!
And yet there are more studies disproving Mercola's claims:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9539465
Mercury in biological fluids after amalgam removal.
"An exponential decline of Hg was seen in all media. Sixty days after the amalgam removal, the Hg levels in blood, plasma, and urine had declined to approximately 60% of the pre-removal levels. In seven subjects, who were followed for up to three years, the half-lives of Hg in plasma and urine were calculated. In plasma, a bi-exponential model was applied, and the half-life was estimated at median 88 days (range, 21 to 121). The kinetics of Hg in urine (nmol/24 hrs) fit a mono-exponential model with a median half-life of 46 days (range, 35 to 67)"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11032131
"In 29 volunteers with a low amalgam load, the number of amalgam-covered tooth surfaces and the occlusal area of the fillings were determined. Before and at select times after removal of all amalgams, concentrations of total mercury were measured by cold-vapor atomic absorption in plasma and erythrocytes as well as in urine together with the excretion rate. Absorbed daily doses were estimated from intraoral Hg emission by two separate methods. The transfer of Hg from the fillings via the oral cavity and blood to urinary excretion was evaluated according to the most representative combination of parameters. This consisted of occlusal area (1), absorbed dose (2), Hg concentration in plasma (3) and urinary excretion (4). Pairwise correlation coefficients were 0.49 for parameters 1 vs. 2, and 0.75 each for parameters 2 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 4. Within 9 days after removal of the fillings, a transient increase in Hg levels was observed in plasma only; in the group without a rubber dam, concentrations increased significantly above pre-removal values at days 1 and 3, whereas they decreased significantly below pre-removal values at day 30 in the rubber-dam group and at day 100 in both groups. Excretion rates decreased significantly at day 100 in the protected group. Peak plasma-Hg was 0.6 ng/ml on average at day 1 and decreased with halftimes of 3 and 43 days in subjects protected by a rubber dam. The results indicated that concentrations of total mercury in plasma responded rapidly to changes in the amalgam status and reflected the actual absorption most reliably. Notably, plasma-Hg levels were sensitive enough to detect a transient attenuation of the additional exposure after using a rubber dam during the removal of only a few fillings. However, being small in magnitude and lasting 100 days at best, the rubber-dam effect had minor toxicological relevance."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9600804
"Peak plasma Hg was 0.6 ng/ml on average and decreased with halftimes between 5 and 13 days."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9630463
The absorption, blood levels, and excretion of mercury after a single dose of mercury vapor in humans.
"Nine healthy volunteers without amalgam fillings were exposed to 400 micrograms/m3 mercury vapor (Hg0) for 15 min, corresponding to 5.5 nmol Hg0/kg body wt (median range: 4.4-7.2). Frequent sampling of blood, urine, and exhaled air was performed for 30 days after exposure. The median retention of Hg0 was 69% of the inhaled dose. During the first 3 days after exposure 7.5-12% of the absorbed dose was lost by exhalation, with the median half time of Hg0 in expired breath being 2.0 days. In blood and plasma, a rapid absorption phase of Hg was seen, followed by a biexponential decline of the curves in both media. A substantial interindividual variation was observed in the area under the concentration-time curves of Hg in blood and plasma. In plasma the median half time of the second phase was 10 days. About 1.0% of the absorbed Hg was excreted via urine during the first 3 days after exposure, whereas the estimated amount excreted during 30 days ranged from 8 to 40%. In order to evaluate the chronic exposure to mercury from dental amalgam in the general population, the daily Hg dose from the fillings were estimated based on the plasma Hg levels found in subjects with amalgam fillings and on the plasma Hg clearance obtained in the present study. The daily Hg dose was estimated to 5-9 micrograms/day in subjects with an ordinary number of amalgam fillings."
Not to be argumentative, but I wish to bring to your attention my experience with mercury.
As a teen, I would play with the mercury from switches and tear apart mercury batteries so common at the time for their droplets of the liquid metal. As a kid, had countless amalgams. At age 30 had teeth removed. At age 55, was feeling tired all the time so knew it was useless to see a MD and went to chelation MD. A lot of talk radio at the time discussed the benefits, so worth a try. Through muscle testing, it was determined mercury was the first to be eliminated by the suggested monthly DMPS IV chelation. EDTA followed months latter. Within 2-3 months I was feeling the benefits. Best $2K ever spent. Yes, I was part of the Hostess Twinkie /Coca Cola generation, hence was not on a healthy lifestyle like you follow and encourage here. So the bottom line is, I was convinced the metal was in me for an awful long time and hard to convince me otherwise. What other conclusion can it be?
Again, I NEVER claimed that mercury was harmless. As was addressed earlier there are a number of factors that play a role in the toxicity of mercury. Form of mercury, method of exposure, binders in the diet, etc. You apparently were exposed to high levels of mercury metal. This is far different than the small amounts of mercury that are in mercury amalgams and that is primarily released upon chewing. And again, when we chew our food it often contains compounds that strongly bind to mercury and eliminate it from the body such as phytic acid, alginates and pectins. We also exhale some of the mercury vapors. So what is released is not the same as what is absorbed and deposited in to the tissues.
And has anyone bothered to ponder this fact? The majority of mercury from amalgams was shown in studies to be released within the first two years of having them put in. So why are these people not getting sick with mercury poisoning in their childhood when the amalgams were put in? Instead these people are suddenly getting sick when they read about all the dangers and supposed symptoms of mercury poisoning on the internet. Has anyone stopped to consider how many of these illnesses are from a psychosomatic origin from the mass hysteria all the mercury is going to kill everyone internet sites are presenting? If I were a major conspiracy hypothesis person like the Trolling Stones I would think that the dentists around the world are in bed with the AMA, FDA and the New World Order to make big bucks off of all these people by scaring them in to having their amalgams removed and replaced with ceramics!!!
I really think the Trolling Stones are doing more harm to their health through their own uncontrolled paranoia than their amalgams could ever cause.
Where's yours?
I would not expect an answer. With the Trolling Stones they think the world revolves solely around them. So they feel the same rules do not apply including behaving and answering questions and providing evidence when they demand others do so.
#152769, you have done nothing but attack me over on the other forum. You are not going to come here to continue your name calling and games. Like Trapper I have no problem with debate if it is kept civil. But you neither debate nor do you keep things civil so i am banning you from here rather than wasting time dealing with your games.
You already know my position about people hiding behind numbers just so they can attack others anonymously.
But since you ask, as one example a very good friend of mine that I have known for over 20 years has a child with autism. Since starting him on the supplements, particularly TMG, he has been improving tremendously.
Did mercury cause his autism? Who knows? There is speculation that mercury causes autism, and personally I do think there is a very strong link as I have posted on in the past.
But people keep taking one small portions of what I say, exaggerate what was said and come to erroneous conclusions as to what I believe in and what I don't as so many of the iodine supporters and mercury amalgam alarmists keep doing. Again, it wastes so much time going round and round with these people because they choose to believe I said things I never said and that I believe in things I never said I believe in. They just want to argue and play their troll games. Sorry, but it is not going to happen here.