UserX
There's nothing to "revolt" against, so far as I'm concerned. America has always been an "every man for himself" kind of place, with no political imperium ab initio so its natural that it would evolve to a system expressive of those who've descended from those who've done the best for themselves. Its Darwin in action. The strongest are ruling, which means that "revolt" is impossible since those who would revolt are inherently lessers on the totem pole. Those few not in the ruling class who figure it out have a choice to try to join in or not. But even if there were some "revolt", what would replace that which currently exists ?
Ron Paul's "go back to the Constitution" crowd ? Well, we've seen where the "constitution" leads - to the current situation, so Ron Paul, as appealing as he might seem to old farts including myself, isn't the way forward on the human governmental scheme of things, if any direction "forward" even exists anymore.
Oh wait, I have another thought about this.... I'll go tell it to the wall in the garage. Funny isn't it, how most folk ye meet think they have everything all figure out ?