It has become apparent that there is an effort on Wikipedia to use mob rule censorship of valid information in regards to both Hulda Clark and Royal Rife.

Example: The article states 'In one case, a patient with a cardiac pacemaker suffered arrhythmias because of interference from the "Zapper."'

In an effort to correct a glaring error, I posted the following correction: 'Despite being cautioned about exposure to environmental magnetic fields and in disregard of the warning on the device package, a patient with a suffered because of interference from the "Zapper"' and noted that it was a direct quote from the article that they referenced.

Regardless of my efforts to correct the information, the correction was erased time and again by a stream of individuals who do not want the truth known.

The article cited provides several important notations.

1) Both patients and health care professionals should be aware of potential pacemaker interactions in the environment, since cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators are sensitive to many kinds of electromagnetic interference.

2) Pacemakers and defibrillators are frequently exposed to a “hostile” electromagnetic environment from a variety of external sources. These include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment, metal detectors, antitheft devices, household appliances, some digital cellular phones, and power tools.2 The most frequent adverse responses to electromagnetic interference are inappropriate temporary inhibition, as documented in our patient, or triggering of pacemaker stimuli and reversion to asynchronous pacing

3) Despite being cautioned about exposure to environmental magnetic fields and in disregard of the warning on the device package, our patient used the Zapper

The writers of this Wikipedia article intentionally attempt to skew the truth by implying that the zapper is the hazard, while medical literature, pacemaker instructions, and many other sources plainly point out that this is a problem with the pacemaker. The patient had been properly warned.

4) The Zapper, which is available worldwide, is a simple, battery-powered, direct-current–offset pulse generator with square-wave output at a constant frequency

In further support of the effort to demonize Clark and Rife, the Rife article mentions the story of a person who cured their cancer using an electrical device that was referred to as a Rife machine but their cancer later came back and they died. The machine was then described as an electronic timer with resistors and capacitors ( A Hulda Clark Zapper, not a Rife machine ).

The article implies 'Shame on that mean machine for curing the person's cancer and then letting it come back. Corrections to the article were immediately and repeatedly reversed.

This is as Orwellian as it can get and these are not the only cases.

If you feel the same as I do, please visit the following pages:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulda_Clark


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rife


at the bottom of each page is a rating. Please mark each as not trustworthy, not objective, and not complete ( 1 star out of 5 for each ).

You may also visit this petition for zappers: http://www.paradevices.com/petition_link.html

where you can read what other say about zappers and leave your own comments ( positive of negative ) as well.