More misleading and debunked propaganda from the Weston Price Foundation.
I like this line from their site:
"The study found that those rabbits that had consumed the soybean hay suffered from partial reproductive failure.”
Again it really goes to show the lengths that the Weston Price Foundation will go to for their propaganda campaign. Note they are heavily utilizing animal studies that DO NOT apply to humans. And they are feeding soybeans to an animal that does not normally consume soybeans. That is like feeding corn to a snake and expecting the snake to be healthy. These studies often also use isolated compounds in extremely high levels for the sole purpose of creating adverse reactions. On the other hand if they relied on actual human studies at proper levels then they would find that humans studies have not only shown soy to be safe, but also beneficial to the body in various ways.
Of course relying on properly conducted human studies would not benefit the Weston Price Foundation, nor their biggest sponsors the beef So instead they look for any non-applicable studies that bash soy to present as "evidence" to help protect their sponsor's profits.
http://www.naturalhealthstrategies.com/dangers-of-soy.html
More misleading claims that have already been debunked. This is a big problem with the internet. Too many people simply repeating the same misinformation from propaganda websites without ever bothering to actually research the facts before repeating the myths.
Do You Still Think We’re Exaggerating the Dangers of Soy?
No doubt about it.
I just have to say after reading H. posts for the years that I have come on here.. It seems unless it comes from H. it has got to be bogus Propaganda and not worth reading. No matter how Prestigious.
I have to point out tho' that H. however never seems to think that what he puts out could possible be bogus or Propaganda ...
The difference is that I rely on reading actual studies. You simply keep reposting the myths that have already been debunked over and over.
Love to see what his health is when he is 65 and 68 years old. We have no gray hair.. Bet he gets gray hair before he reaches 45 years old for He sounds really young to me.
I see, you cannot beat me with real evidence so instead you decide to rely on personal attacks. Have you ever heard of genetics? Gray hair does not mean one is unhealthy. I know people who are much younger than me that are perfectly healthy but also have gray hair. So what health issues do you have?
It is really funny to me how he copies off what I say just letting more people hear what I have to say...
Yep, followed with the evidence debunking the claims since the claims are not from credible sites.
I usally do not even read what he has to say.. not worth my time.. We all know the ones that love to be negative, snipe and cause spite and discontent.. so I stay away from these types of people.. but love reading the other comments. Some really nice people on here as a whole.
Ironic that you would say this right after insulting me that I have gray hair. What hypocrisy!!!
You all take care..
and I wish you all well
(yes even H. I consider H. one of the young and ignornt ones )
More sniping since you cannot address my statements with real evidence. Typical of many Curezone posters.
I suggest that you keep on eating your unfermented soy and see what happens to your health in the future. Please be good enough to let us know your findings.
Well Chris, so far 47 years of eating soy and absolutely no health issues. How many health issues do you have?
By the way, you may want to read those references you posted supposedly to bash soy since if you actually read them you will see how many are touting the benefits of soy:
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1881439#i
Again, people should actually read the evidence they are posting if they want to back their opinions.
Of course this is a common tactic of the anti-soy propaganda sites as well. They use any site making a comment about soy and use it as a reference so they overwhelm the reader. They know that the average person will not bother to take the time to actually read the references to see what they are saying and will assume that they are saying something bad about soy. Just like you did. Fortunately, there are people, like me, who care about the truth and will actually read references. And luckily for everyone many of the references you posted were touting the benefits of soy, including its anti-cancer properties. So now everyone is seeing the facts, not the propaganda.
The global jury is in on the danger of unfermented Soy and the Weston Price Foundation are not the only organisation against its use.
Dr Mercola for example has weighed the evidence of thousands of studies in consuming soy in its unfermented state, and concluded that the risks of consuming unfermented soy products FAR outweigh any possible benefits; that is unless he also has an agenda to bash soy because of his financial support from the beef and dairy industries!!......................
Mercola has been debunked on various issues as I have addressed previously as well:
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1505749#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1578913#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1707797#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1585657#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1700602#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1733066#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1442763#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1473734#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1542308#i
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1881037#i
So we have Mercola making up false claims and contradicting himself multiple times such as saying soy is dangerous due to its phytoestrogens while claiming flax seed is healthy even though it is nearly 4 times higher in phytoestrogens than soy. Flax seed also contains phytates that Mercola claims are dangerous. Then claiming soy is dangerous due to the glutamate, which IS NOT present in all soy, yet he consumes a lot of cheese and other foods that contain considerably more glutamate than found in some soy products. This does show though how people will listen to anyone, no matter how much they are making up, as long as it fits their pre-conceived notions or agendas. This is also why I don't rely on propaganda sites for my information and instead rely on credible sources such as properly conducted studies.
H is right. When i was doing too much flax meal it was screwing with my prostate(enlarged prostate). From what i recall flax seem to be having more estrogen effects than soy. I went on the soy craze as well and it did not give me issues as much as flax meal did. I dont see a problem with people doing fermented soy every now and then. Women probably benefit from soy+flax more than men. Lean meat works better for me than soy.