The powerful new documentary by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
See also:
New Investigative Panel Releases 13 Consensus Statements of Evidence Opposing the Official Account of 9/11
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/234718-New-Investigative-Panel-Releases-13-...
Airplanes have been flown by remote-control since 1917. As Wikipedia notes:
In 1917, Archibald Low as head of the RFC [Britain's Royal Flying Corps] Experimental Works, was the first person to use radio control successfully on an aircraft.
***
There were also [during the 1930s] remotely controlled cutters and experimental remotely controlled planes in the Red Army. In the 1930s Britain developed the radio controlled Queen Bee, a remotely controlled unmanned Tiger Moth aircraft for a fleet’s gunnery firing practice. The Queen Bee was superseded by the similarly named Queen Wasp, a later, purpose built, target aircraft of higher performance.
As the Norfolk and Suffolk Aviation Museum notes, President John F. Kennedy’s older brother flew a secret mission involving the remote-control flying of a bomb-laden airplane to attack Nazi targets inside France:
On the 31st July 1944 a U.S.N. special air unit, codenamed Project Anvil, moved to Fersfield from Dunkeswell in Devon. The mission was to involve the use of explosive-laden PB4Y-1 Liberator bombers under radio control. The crew of two, Lt Joe Kennedy (pilot), and Lt. Wilford John Willy (radio control technician/co-pilot), were to take off with 21,150 lbs of Torpex in 347 boxes and establish radio control of the Liberator by a Ventura mother-ship. Once full control was established and tested, at a pre-determined point the crew would parachute from the aircraft through the nose wheel bay emergency exit and the bomber would continue the rest of its mission under radio control, finally crashing onto the target.
In addition, Norad has been able to fly planes remotely for many decades:
NORAD (the North American Air Defense Command) had at its disposal a number of U.S. Air Force General Dynamics F-106 Delta Dart fighter aircraft configured to be remotely flown into combat as early as 1959 under the auspices of a program know as SAGE. These aircraft could be started, taxied, taken off, flown into combat, fight, and return to a landing entirely by remote control, with the only human intervention needed being to fuel and re-arm them.
As Wikipedia explains:
The Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) was an automated control system for tracking and intercepting enemy bomber aircraft used by NORAD from the late 1950s into the 1980s. In later versions, the system could automatically direct aircraft to an interception by sending instructions directly to the aircraft’s autopilot.
***
In normal operation, communications between the SAGE centers and the interceptor aircraft was relayed via radio equipment at the radar sites, which were more widely spread out than the SAGE centers themselves. A properly equipped aircraft, like the F-106 Delta Dart, could feed the SAGE directions into the autopilot and fly “hands off” to the interception.
NASA and the FAA flew a plane by remote control in 1984:
In 1984 NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) teamed-up in a unique flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), to test the impact of a Boeing 720 aircraft using standard fuel with an additive designed to suppress fire.
***
On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent-to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8-degree glide slope.
Indeed, prior to 9/11, remote-controlled planes could fly up to 8,600 miles (from the April 24, 2001 edition of Britain’s International Television News).
One day after 9/11, an article appeared on the top science and technology news service stating “hijackings could be halted in progress with existing technologies, say aviation researchers”. The article quoted a transportation expert as saying:
“Most modern aircraft have some form of autopilot that could be re-programmed to ignore commands from a hijacker and instead take direction from the ground . . . .”
See also this article, in which the former head of British Airways “suggested . . . that aircraft could be commandeered from the ground and controlled remotely in the event of a hijack.”
http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/airplanes-have-been-flown-remote-control...
Nice to see that these experts coming together to call for a new investigation. However, I sense that the group has been infiltrated by some that would keep the smoke screen in place. Note: there are no nuclear physicists/thermonuclear/underground atomic explosions experts as part of this group.
Thermite may have been part of the architectural plans that went into the design of the WTC project - Since it is understood that the NYC Department of Building requires demolition plans to be in the architecture plans of any skyscraper before a building permit can be allowed. Chicago has this as well. And Thermite alone cannot be the cause of the sustained extremely high temperatures that were present there for more than 6 months after the event took place. High enough to keep rock, concrete & steel in a molten state for more than a month! - Thermite? - No Way!
Dimitri Khalezov has the most compelling evidence yet in explaining the pulverization of all three buildings into nearly complete dust. As well as the three hot spots that were shown by satellite. According to Dimitri Khalezov, Controlled Demolition Inc. would hold the answer to many questions here. You can bet that they are under certain National Security guidelines so as to keep that info out of public scrutiny.
Tom Sullivan only made a short appearance on that video. He was a high school friend of Doug Loizeaux of the same Loizeaux family as CDI's owner, Jack Loizeaux. A very interesting coincidence is that CDI was not only contracted to do the cleanup of the WTC, but was also involved in with the Alfred P. Murrah building, Oklahoma City. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_Demolition,_Inc. ... an event, that Dimitri had said in a recent interview (a few months ago), that nuclear devices were also involved with that building's demise, as well as a few other events... http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1774320
Although Tom Sullivan had worked for CDI for three years, it appears to me that his presence as a so-called CDI whistle-blower is to steer the hound-dogs for truth off the track & into a Thermite smoke-screen quagmire, well away from the possibility of anyone considering that this was a nuclear demolition event.
Controlled Demolition Inc., being contracted to do the clean-up of WTC, would also have the understanding, as being the company that had prepared the plans for the future demolition of the wtc construction project, they would be best to know what evidence needed to be covered up & quickly swept under the carpet of dust.
Also there was no mention from this group of engineers the feasibility of aluminum planes being capable of penetrating a grid of thick steel beams.
There appears to be some sort of "advanced" technology at work here that present the illusion that real planes actually hit the two towers. Certainly something plowed through 6 walls of the Pentagon, however it could not have been a American Airlines Commercial Jetliner.