by S. L. Baker (NaturalNews) In findings just published in the journal Anticancer Research, scientists at the University of California (UC) San Diego School of Medicine and Creighton University School of Medicine in Omaha have reported that most people need a much higher intake of vitamin D. And that simple step added to your life could slash your risk of developing serious diseases -- including cancer -- by about 50 percent.
Be sure to visit our website today - It's never too late or too early to begin living healthier, happier, longer lasting lives. Click on the image above or else go to: http://www.tbyil.comScientists say higher vitamin D intake will slash cancer, MS, and diabetes risk by half
The new study involved a survey of several thousand volunteers who took supplements containing 1000 to 10,000 IU per day. The researchers ran blood tests to measure the level of 25-vitamin D, which is the form of almost all vitamin D circulating in the bloodstream.
"We found that daily intakes of vitamin D by adults in the range of 4000 to 8000 IU are needed to maintain blood levels of vitamin D metabolites in the range needed to reduce by about half the risk of several diseases -- breast cancer, colon cancer, multiple sclerosis, and type 1 diabetes," Dr. Cedric Garland, professor of family and preventive medicine at UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, said in a statement to media.
He added that the amount of vitamin D needed for disease prevention is far higher than the minimal dosage of 400 IU per day that was originally prescribed in the 20th century to treat and prevent rickets. However, upping vitamin D intake into the 4000 IU daily range and higher appears to be safe, according to a December 2010 report from the National Academy of Sciences Institute of Medicine.
"Most scientists who are actively working with vitamin D now believe that 40 to 60 ng/ml is the appropriate target concentration of 25-vitamin D in the blood for preventing the major vitamin D-deficiency related diseases, and have joined in a letter on this topic," Dr. Garland stated. "Unfortunately, according to a recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, only 10 percent of the US population has levels in this range, mainly people who work outdoors."
Robert P. Heaney, MD, of Creighton University, a distinguished biomedical scientist, said he was not surprised by the new study's results based on his decades of research into the health benefits of vitamin D. "Now is the time for virtually everyone to take more vitamin D to help prevent some major types of cancer, several other serious illnesses, and fractures," Dr. Heaney said a statement to the press.
For more information:
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Die...
http://www.naturalnews.com/vitamin_...
Hey Denny -
I could not readily find the study online in a brief look, but from what I did see in the NN article and elsewhere I cannot tell what form of Vitamin D the study used. Obviously D3 is the much preferred form. Then again, the very best thing to do is to get as much of your desired D in natural form from sunshine and when seasons or other reasons prevent that from happening supplement with D3.
I am a big, big fan of Vitamin D, but have to say that the more positive studies about supplemental Vitamin D I see coming from the folks who ifrst scared us out of the life-giving sun and had us slathering on carcinogenic sunscreens for decades, the more I wonder "what is the catch?"
Fortunately for me I live far enough south to be able to get plenty of direct and indirect sunshine most of the year - though often I don't look up from the dang computer until it's dark out. Gotta change that . . .
All the best,
Tony
Be sure to visit our website today - It's never too late or too early to begin living healthier, happier, longer lasting lives. Click on the image above or else go to: http://www.tbyil.com