http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090825085954.htm
ScienceDaily (Aug. 27, 2009) — A hallmark of cystic fibrosis, a disease caused by mutations in the CTFR gene, is the accumulation of abnormally thick and sticky mucus in the lung, intestine, and various other organs. Although the accumulation of this mucus is thought likely to play a central role in the development of disease, how mutations in the CTFR gene lead to mucus accumulation have not been determined.
However, Paul Quinton and colleagues, at the University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, have now provided insight into this issue by studying mouse small intestine segments ex vivo, according to a paper to be published in the August 24 issue of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. In an accompanying commentary, Robert DeLisle, at the University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, highlights the importance of the study and the potential new take on how mutations in the CTFR gene lead to mucus accumulation and disease.
One of the functions of the CTFR protein generated by the nonmutated CTFR gene is to transport bicarbonate (HCO3–) out of cells. In their study, Quinton and colleagues developed a new ex vivo system for monitoring mucus release from the mouse small intestine to investigate whether defects in this function of CFTR might affect mucus secretion. Although basal rates of mucus release were similar in the presence or absence of bicarbonate, mucus release stimulated by natural chemicals such as serotonin was markedly decreased in the absence of bicarbonate. Interestingly, in a mouse model of cystic fibrosis, mucus release stimulated by natural chemicals was minimal in the presence or absence of bicarbonate. The authors therefore suggest that normal mucus release requires concurrent bicarbonate secretion and that the abnormally thick and sticky mucus that characterizes cystic fibrosis might be caused by defective bicarbonate secretion.
How does one stimulate the release of bicarbonate? Or how does one bring this defective bicarbonate secretion back to normal?
Forskohlin appears to do this in normal tissues, but not those of CF patients. Although I have seen studies in the past showing a benefit of forskohlin in CF patients. If I recall right it had something to do with restoring proper Cl movement across cell membranes. I have not studied this in quite a few years so I have to do more investigation. This article does discuss the use of forskohlin and some of its effects with regards to Cl and bicarbonate:
Does this mean that the areas which are affected are more acidic than normal?
Yes, it appears that the acidity is part of the problem preventing the clearance of the mucous:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC442972/ (Read last paragraph of last page). But the acidity is not the cause of the disease. The disease is causing the acidity by decreasing bicarbonate release.
Found this study that shows that cAMP can stimulate bicarbonate (HCO3- ) secretion, which is contrary to the other studies unless I read the other studies wrong:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11875274?ordinalpos=1&itool=PPMCLayout...
JOP. 2001 Jul;2(4 Suppl):291-3.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. mjwelsh@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu
To test for the presence of HCO(3)(-) transport across airway epithelia, we measured short-circuit current in primary cultures of canine and human airway epithelia bathed in a Cl(-)-free, HCO(3)(-)/CO(2)-buffered solution. cAMP agonists stimulated a secretory current that was likely carried by HCO(3)(-) because it was absent in HCO(3)(-)-free solutions. In addition, the cAMP-stimulated current was inhibited by the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide, and by the apical addition of a blocker of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), diphenylamine-2-carboxylate. The current was dependent on Na(+) because it was inhibited by removing Na(+) from the submucosal solution and by inhibition of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase with ouabain. The cAMP-stimulated current was absent in cystic fibrosis (CF) airway epithelia. These data suggest that cAMP agonists can stimulate HCO(3)(-) secretion across airway epithelia and that CFTR may provide a conductive pathway for HCO(3)(-) movement across the apical membrane.
Forskohlin, from the herb coleus forskohlii, raises cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels as we were discussing yesterday. But cAMP is broken down relatively quick by cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase (cAMPPDE), so this enzyme needs to be blocked to obtain maximum cAMP benefits. Taking watercress with the forskohlii is a easy and safe method of doing this.
More on the subject:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1313448?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSyste...
J Clin Invest. 1992 Apr;89(4):1148-53. Department of Pediatrics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242. Adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate stimulates chloride (Cl-) secretion across airway epithelia. To determine whether cAMP also stimulates HCO3- secretion, we studied cultured canine and human airway epithelial cells bathed in a HCO3-/CO2-buffered, Cl(-)-free solution. Addition of forskolin stimulated an increase in short-circuit current that was likely a result of bicarbonate secretion because it was inhibited by a HCO3(-)-free solution, by addition of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide, or by mucosal addition of the anion channel blocker, diphenylamine 2-carboxylate. The current was dependent on Na+ because it was inhibited by removal of Na+ from the submucosal bathing solution, by addition of the Na+ pump inhibitor, ouabain, or by addition of amiloride (1 mM) to the submucosal solution. An increase in cytosolic Ca2+ produced by addition of a Ca2+ ionophore also stimulated short-circuit current. These data suggest that cAMP and Ca2+ stimulate HCO3- secretion across airway epithelium, and suggest that HCO3- leaves the cell across the apical membrane via conductive pathways. These results may explain previous observations that the short-circuit current across airway epithelia was not entirely accounted for by the sum of Na+ absorption and Cl- secretion. The cAMP-induced secretory response was absent in cystic fibrosis (CF) airway epithelial cells, although Ca(2+)-stimulated secretion was intact. This result suggests that HCO3- exist at the apical membrane is through the Cl- channel that is defectively regulated in CF epithelia. These results suggest the possibility that a defect in HCO3- secretion may contribute to the pathophysiology of CF pulmonary disease.cAMP stimulates bicarbonate secretion across normal, but not cystic fibrosis airway epithelia.
http://physiologyonline.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/18/1/38
CFTR and Bicarbonate Secretion to Epithelial Cells
Abstract
Defective HCO3– and fluid secretion are hallmarks of the pathophysiology of the pancreas of cystic fibrosis patients. Recently, impaired HCO3– secretion has been shown in most tissues known to express the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). New results suggest that CFTR plays an important role in the transcellular secretion of HCO3–.
Introduction |
---|
HCO3– secretion in the exocrine pancreas |
---|
The exocrine pancreas consists of two morphologically distinct structures: 1) acinar cells that secrete enzymes, mucins, and NaCl and 2) duct cells that mainly secrete a HCO3–-rich fluid. The cause for the pancreatic insufficiency in CF has been attributed to a lack of ductal function, whereas the acinar cells show only small or no abnormalities at all. Thus it was no surprise that immunocytochemical studies localized CFTR almost exclusively to the pancreatic ductal cells, although a few reports demonstrated some scanty expression in the acinar cells. The general concept of ductal fluid secretion has been developed over the past 60 years. Bro-Rasmussen and colleagues (1) were among the first to correlate the HCO3– concentration with the secretory output of the pancreas after stimulation with the hormone secretin, a cAMP-mediated agonist (1). The observedinverse correlation between the HCO3– and the Cl– content of the pancreatic juice can now be found in most textbooks of physiology. In a series of elegant experiments on perfused pancreatic ducts (13), Ivana Novak and Rainer Greger demonstrated that the ductal epithelial cell uses a unique mechanism for its secretory functions. The simplified model in Fig. 1 depicts their basic hypothesis for ductal HCO3– secretion.
View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
FIGURE 1. HCO3– secretion by the rat pancreatic duct cell. The lipid-permeable CO2 enters the cell through the basolateral membrane and serves as a pool for the generation of H2HCO3 and, subsequently, HCO3–. HCO3– leaves the cell via a luminal anion exchanger. The accumulated Cl– recycles vial luminal Cl– channels.
Does CFTR directly regulate anion exchange? |
---|
View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
FIGURE 2. HCO3– secretion by distal pancreatic ducts. The decrease in the luminal Cl– concentration leads to a subsequent loss of driving force for the anion exchange mechanism. To sustain further Cl–-independent HCO3– secretion, an alternative HCO3– exit via an electrogenic pathway was postulated. The n (in nHCO3–) refers to the number of ions transported with a single Na+ ion and varies between 2 and 3.
Does CFTR conduct HCO3–? |
---|
|
HCO3– secretion in the airways |
---|
Secretion of airway serous cells: lessons from Calu-3 cell studies |
---|
Calu-3 cells display a low basal Isc that increases upon stimulation with forskolin. Isotope flux studies revealed that the forskolin-stimulated Isc was not the result of net Cl–, Na+, or K+ transport,leaving HCO3– secretion as the likely basis of the Isc. Ion substitution studies showed that the forskolin-stimulated Isc did not require Cl– in the mucosal or serosal bathing solutions but did require serosal HCO3– and serosal Na+.Bumetanide, an inhibitor of the Na+-K+-2Cl– cotransporter, also failed to block the forskolin-stimulated Isc. In contrast, serosal DNDS, but not mucosal DNDS, partially inhibited the forskolin-stimulated Isc. These results led us to conclude that Calu-3 cells secrete HCO3– by an electrogenic mechanism in response to forskolin stimulation. We proposed that HCO3– influx across the basolateral membrane was mediated by a DNDS-sensitive Na+-HCO3–cotransporter (NBC). HCO3– exit across the apical membrane did not require luminal Cl–, nor was it inhibited by mucosal DNDS. Thus we proposed that HCO3– exit was mediated by CFTR.
The switch from HCO3– to Cl– secretion: driving force matters |
---|
View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
FIGURE 3. Effects of forskolin and 1-EBIO on Calu-3 cell short-circuit current (Isc) and 36Cl– fluxes. A: representative Isc recording in response to forskolin (2 µmol/l) and 1-ethyl benzimadazolone (1-EBIO; 1 mmol/l). B: summary of mucosal-to-serosal (Jms), serosal-to-mucosal (Jsm), and net 36Cl– (Jnet) fluxes under forskolin- and forskolin plus 1-EBIO-stimulated conditions. Reproduced from the Journal of General Physiology, 1999, vol. 113, pp. 743–760 by copyright permission of The Rockefeller University Press.
Consistent with the very high levels of CFTR expression, forskolin causes the apical membrane resistance to fall to a remarkably low value. At the same time we observe a depolarization of the apical membrane to the equilibrium potential for Cl–. This effect is so dominant that it also depolarizes the basolateral membrane due to the low shunt resistance of the paracellular pathway. The activation of basolateral membrane K+ channels by forskolin, as is evident from the decrease in the basolateral membrane resistance upon forskolin stimulation, is insufficient to maintain the basolateral membrane potential. Instead the basolateral membrane depolarizes, and this provides a favorable membrane potential for HCO3– entry on an electrogenic NBC. Whether forskolin also activates the NBC via PKA-mediated phosphorylation is not known at this time. Thus the very high apical membrane anion conductance stimulated by forskolin 1) serves to mediate the conductive exit of HCO3–, 2) sets the driving force for HCO3– exit across the apical membrane, and 3) sets the driving force for the entry of HCO3– across the basolateral membrane on the NBC.
As expected for the activation of basolateral membrane K+ channels by 1-EBIO, the basolateral membrane and apical membrane potentials are seen to hyperpolarize from their forskolin-stimulated values. The hyperpolarization of the apical membrane would be expected to increase the driving force for both HCO3– and Cl– exit and thus cannot explain the inhibition of HCO3– secretion. However, the hyperpolarization of the basolateral membrane potential is expected to inhibit the influx of HCO3– mediated by an electrogenic NBC that moves a net anionic charge. The removal of Na+ or HCO3– from the serosal solution or the addition of DNDS both result in the depolarization of the basolateral membrane potential, as expected for an electrogenic NBC (Tamada, Hug, and Bridges, unpublished observations). Indeed, one may deduce from the basolateral membrane potential measurements in forskolin and forskolin plus 1-EBIO-stimulated cells that the Na+-HCO3– stoichiometry of the NBC in Calu-3 cells is 1:3. On the basis of these observations, we proposed a model for anion secretion by airway serous cells that is depicted in Fig. 4.
View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
FIGURE 4. Proposed model for anion secretion in Calu-3 cells. A: forskolin-stimulated cells secrete HCO3–. B: forskolin plus 1-EBIO-stimulated cells secrete Cl–.
Summary |
---|
Acknowledgments |
---|
References |
---|
This is a horrid disease. You have found that the science community has a lot of information about it in great detail. They also have had a lot of money dumped into it for a long time. It is hard to believe that they haven't come close to a cure. Maybe this new generation of bio-engineers with genetic engineering can solve this problem.
I feel as with most diseases that they can care less about a cure. Yes, there is research being done, but there are many researchers who live of of their grants. A portion of their grants can be allocated to "living expenses" to allow them to do full time research. So the researchers do not want a cure any more than the pharmaceutical companies want a cure. If a cure is found their grants dry up. Therefore the researchers are always making new discoveries to keep the grants coming in and they are always getting close to a cure but the cure never materializes. Just look at all the money that has been dumped in to cancer research, yet every cure shown to work has been suppressed.
Thanks for all the research, H. Difficult, however, to determine how one might apply the information toward any type of experimental treatment of his own.
Any ideas, expressed in more layman terms?
I am working with an herbal formula based on some of the research I have dug up on CF. So far I have had feedback from one person who said it was working well for him and I am waiting for more feedback from other individuals to see if I am on the right track with the concepts.