I am glad they made some of the changes they did, such as eliminating silver chloride, but there are still a few things I am leery of.

DMSO can be a good thing if used carefully and properly.  Though I generally do not recommend it due to the hassles and safety issues.  My biggest concern is people not cleaning the application site properly.  Because DMSO crosses the skin so rapidly it will also take pretty much anything it contacts through the skin with it in to the bloodstream.  This includes soap scum.  So the area needs to be cleaned really well with soap and water, then again with rubbing alcohol to remove the soap scum before applying the DMSO.

My other big concern is the possible reaction of the hypochlorite, improperly being referred to as chlorine dioxide (a very toxic gas), with the DMSO.  This is based on the Ramirez case a while back in which there was a conversion of the DMSO a cancer patient was using in to toxic DMSO₄.  Here is a link to where I discussed it before:

http://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=1435824#i


Anyway, hypochlorites are oxidizers, and there is not enough known about interactions between DMSO and oxidizers.  We do know that we can oxidize DMSO with heat in to DMSO₂, also known as methylsulfonylmethane (MSM), but not with stronger oxidizers.

Hypochlorites make me nervous anyway.  Again very little is known about their action in the body or interactions with other compounds.  Chlorine is needed by the body, but it also forms some of the most toxic compounds known to man such as nerve agents.

MSM is good, but I still prefer to get my sulfur from natural sources as much as possible.  Commercial MSM is not natural.  Again it is synthesized from the industrial solvent DMSO.

I had a lady one time selling MSM through network marketing try to convince me that MSM was natural.  She said it came from trees.  Actually the DMSO is a byproduct of the paper industry.  This is then heated to convert the DMSO in to MSM.  So I told her that is like claiming plastics are natural since they are formed from naturally occurring oil.

I have never been a big fan of colloidal silver either.  I think it is way overhyped.  And I have found that many of the silver products on the market are either not true colloids or contain very little silver. And they charge a fortune for something that literally takes pennies to make.

I have made strong colloidal silver solutions in the past but rarely did much with them.  The last time I used it was about 15 years ago when I cut half of the last digit of my thumb off on a table saw.  What was left of the cut off part was too mangled to put back on so I figured I was going to have to live with a short thumb the rest of my life.  On a couple of tips (no pun intended) from a doctor friend of mine and some natural healers I combined their suggestions.  The doctor showed me some nylon impregnated with silver that could be put over the amputated area and the silver driven in to the tissue with electrical energy to stimulate tissue growth on the amputation.  He only had a tiny piece though about the size of dime.  So I substituted a very concentrated colloidal silver solution that I would soak the amputation in.  My other friends had mentioned regrowing amputated areas with high voltage through argon tubes.  Keep in mind that the body is electric, and electricity has been shown to stimulate the growth of some tissues, such as bone.  I was willing to try anything, so I looked for a tube.  I could not find an argon tube, but I managed to scrounge a neon tube from a photospectrometer.  I hooked that up to a 15,000 volt 30ma transformer.  I would soak the amputated section in the silver then turn on the power and put the amputated silver soaked area up the tube with the 15,000 volts running through it to help drive the silver in (according to the hypothesis).  First thing I noticed is that was a WONDERFUL pain killer.  And it took 6 months, but I grew the entire tip of the thumb back.  There is just a little, hardly noticeable scar, and I have only recovered about 90% of the feeling in the tip of the thumb.  That I can care less about, I was just so grateful to have the rest of my thumb back!!!

Other than that I have ingested very little as I found it was not very effective for things like colds and flu.  I have other things for that.  And don't ask what because the most effective thing I found again is not safe unless you really know what you are doing.  I did this once though with a cold and all my symptoms were gone within a minute.  And talk about nasty tasting!!!

Silver nitrate is something that is best not fooled with.  It can accumulate in tissues, and it can be poisonous.

This is not to say silver is bad.  I do think it has its place.  For instance silver nitrate had a long history of being used in the eyes of babies to prevent herpes induced blindness.  And Silverdene is used to control infections on burns.  It is just I will not use colloidal silver unless I make it myself so I know how much silver is in it and that it is a true colloid.  Even at that I have other things I prefer in most cases such as herbs, ozone, and radiofrequency therapy.

I am going to cut this short and continue with another post so this does not get too long.  Makes it harder to quote and respond when posts get too long.

They are right about being careful with killing cancer cells.  There are ways for example to kill off large amounts of cancer cells.  But this also comes with risks.  If you killed off a basketball sized tumor in a single shot you would likely kill the patient from sepsis.  We have to keep in mind that dead cells in the body are infectious material.  The body has to have time to clear dead cells from the body before adding to the load by killing more cells.

One thing that I did not like was their saying not to use any antioxidants, immune builders or even multivitmains.  Cancer patients need to protect their healthy cells from free radicals such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy and oxidizers.  Many cancer patients also suffer from cachexia, and really need to maintain their nutrition.  I have an old training textbook on cancer written for doctors. One thing I found really interesting in the book was their statement that most cancer patients do not die from their cancer.  Instead, most cancer patients die from the malnutrition brought on in large part from their treatments.  The treatments can cause severe nausea preventing them from getting all of the nutrition they really need.

They are partially right about the microbial connection to cancer.  There are numerous viruses, bacteria, fungi, etc. capable of causing cancer.  But these are not the only cause. DNA damage, from sources such as radiation exposure and other sources, can also cause cancer.  By far though viruses are the number one cause of most cancers.  There was a very interesting article back years ago in Discover magazine discussing oncogenes (genes that cause cancer).  They finally admitted what had been known in medicine for decades but the medical establishment was doing their best to cover up.  They made the simple statement that every oncogene that had been found to date was viral, and that no human oncogene had ever been found.  The medical establishment wanted to keep this quiet because the implications were enormous.  They would not only have to admit that they had known for a long time that cancers WERE NOT hereditary, which meant that they were knowingly conducting unnecessary testing on people because they had a family history of cancer.  This would also leave major legal implications on doctors performing these unnecessary tests, but also for the doctors scaring women in to getting prophylactic mastectomies and men in to getting prophylactic prostectomies.  What this means is that the doctors were convincing these women and men to have their HEALTHY tissues surgically removed to prevent the possible formation of cancer in these tissues in the future.

They also repeat the common myth that everyone has cancer cells and that our immune systems just fight them off.  I think whoever started this myth was mistaking non-malignant tumor cells for malignant (cancerous cells).  Even though they share some properties there are still very big differences.  A simple way to prove this myth is with a little common sense.  Everyone will suffer immune suppression at various times throughout their lives.  Think about it. Why doesn't everyone get sick from let's say cold or flu viruses they are exposed to? If your immune system is intact and strong then your immunity can help fend off the infection.  This is why we rarely see hospital personnel getting sick from the constant barrage of microbes they are exposed to.  When your defenses are down you are more susceptible to these microbes.  So if we all had cancer cells all the time the cancer cells would take hold, just like a cold or flu virus, when our defenses are down.  And once they take hod they can further weaken our system.  Therefore, if their claim was true then we should all have been dead a long time ago.

Another thing I disagree with is under their goal claim.  They claim the goal is to kill every microbe in every cancer cell.  Not all cancer cells contain microbes.  First of all not all cancers are microbial in origin.  As I mentioned earlier radiation is one thing that can cause DNA breakage.  A few rare leukemias for example have been linked to DNA damage from radiation.  Thyroid cancer is common around nuclear power plants, such as Hanford, where radioactive iodine has been released.  Radon gas can lead to lung cancer....  Furthermore, it is only some cells that get infected with viruses leading to the cancer.  These cells (mother cells) create an excess of cellular division hormones, known as trephones in Europe.  When the level of trephones exceed the level of trephone inhibitors the excess trephones lead to a higher than normal level of abnormal cell (daughter cell) growth.  This is the malignant tumor.  The reason we develop chem resistant tumors is because mother cells are not destroyed by the chemo due to the extra genetic material they contain.  The daughter cells are killed though since they do not contain the extra viral genetic material. So the cancer goes in to "remission" since the mass of mother cells is too small to be detected. When they grow though they create clones of themselves leading to the development of a chemo-resistant tumor. This is just a quick simplified explanation so I am not sitting here all night typing.  Look in to the research of Gaston Naesson for pieces of what I just explained.

There are some other minor things I disagree with.  My biggest problem with this protocol is a lack of any evidence of efficacy or even a demonstration that it really reverts cancer cells to normal.  I also have a problem with the mixture since it is unknown how these different chemicals are going to interact with each other.  For example will the colloidal silver react with the DMSO or MSM forming silver sulfate, or with the sodium chlorite and hypochlorite (the breakdown products of the highly unstable chlorine dioxide) forming toxic silver chloride?  Just too many safety issues to be answered.

I also have to admit that it really bothers me that they keep referring to the MMS as chlorine dioxide when it is not chlorine dioxide.  Chlorine dioxide is a toxic and unstable gas.  It reacts with water yielding the sodium chlorite and hypochlorite.  I have a problem with companies repeatedly making misleading claims, especially when they have been told over and over that the claim is misleading.  Do they feel that chlorine dioxide somehow sounds more healthy or scientific?  Or are they trying to distance themselves from the relationship of MMS to common household bleach?  Regardless of the reason, being deliberately misleading is being deliberately misleading.  And this makes me wonder what else they are being misleading about in order to sell product.  Network marketing companies are notorious for making up false claims about their products, hyping them up to justify the ridiculous prices.  And I cannot stand networking marketing companies for this reason.  So when I see MMS promoters deliberately claiming that it is something it is not I am going to take ALL of their other claims with a grain of salt until I see some solid evidence to the contrary.

Boy are you keeping me busy with your post, LOL!!!

Finally I wanted to address their claims about Rife. I love Rife units provided they are not the all fluff ones. What I mean by this is the ones that have all the different frequencies. I was introduced to Rife Technology about 18 years ago. I managed to get a hold of copies of lot of Rife's original papers and schematics for machine. I do not do electronic circuitry, so I had a custom unit built for me. The first unit was a mix of radio tubes and solid state, and had 7 frequencies. I used alligator clips attached to paper towels soaked in saline for the conduction. The next generation had 6 frequencies, and used independent foot baths with salt. The next generation pretty much the same, but with molded foot baths. After that 3 more frequencies were dropped leaving the 3 frequencies Rife kept. He did not have an 11 page frequency list as is going around. More on that later. The newest generation is a single fixed frequency and no foot bath. Instead is has a metal plate that you put your fingers on and the frequency is "broadcast" through the body.

Before anyone asks, NO, I don't sell them, and I do not have access to any for sale. All of these were prototypes, many of which I lent out to people with illnesses.

All of the units were built strictly for research purposes. This is why frequencies kept getting dropped. Again, I know this is going to open up a can of worms, but Rife only kept 3 frequencies. He did not have hundreds of frequencies as some have claimed. The 11 page frequency list going around is bogus. In fact if you look at some of the frequencies they include dangerous ones such as 42hz, which is the frequency of formaldehyde, which is a carcinogen. So why they are listing that as an anti-cancer frequency is beyond me. We think that a lot of the bogus frequencies were put out there by Rife's second partner Crane in order to throw people off of the real research since he was selling his units for a ridiculous $7,500 a piece. Superb results can be obtained from a single fixed frequency unit costing less than $100. Sellers like to add as many frequencies though to make their units APPEAR more high tech and effective to they can command higher prices. We have had some of these other units tested by an alternative practitionaer and found that they did not work as well as the simple one frequency units.

I am not very good about explaining this part, but there is a basis behind Rife's frequencies that even he did not understand. His machine was not curing people by blasting apart microbes, but rather by retuning the body back in to proper resonance.

This all came about after noticing that Rife's second and third frequencies were much slower to heal than his first frequency (666hz). Yes, I know!!! The 666 being the mark of the beast is Hollywood hype. The supposed real number for the mark of the beast is actually totally different. We also noticed a lot of things being successfully treated that had nothing to do with pathogens. Diabetic neuropathy, general pain, and nerve regeneration as examples.

So the builder started doing some calculations on the different frequencies and found a correlation between our primary frequency and and Rife's remaining 3 frequencies. The reason the last two were slower? Because they were each off by one. So we stuck to the 666hz and found that they worked for every disease and condition they were used for. This included various cancers including very advanced liver cancer, neuropathy, MS, chronic fatigue, nerve regeneration in the brain after surgical removal of tumors, fibromyalgia, etc.

This all brings me back to their claim that the Rife units cure the cancer within 24 hours by converting the cells back to normal by destroying the cancer pathogen. No, Rife units do not cure cancer within 24 hours. On average they take about 1 month. I found that if a person has had previous radiation therapy that it takes much longer. I believe this is because cancer cells can build up a tolerance to radiation therapy the same way they can build up a tolerance to chemotherapy. Both radiation therapy and Rife units use forms of electromagnetic radiation. So the cells building a tolerance to the radiation therapy are inadvertantly building a resistance to the Rife units as well. The longest I have ever seen these units take to get rid of cancer was in someone suffering from bone, esophageal, and lung cancer. He had previous radiation therapy, which did not eradicate the cancer. When he started on the Rife unit the cancer growth just stopped. It did not grown and it did not shrink. It just stayed static for about 6 months. Then it finally started shrinking. Two months later it was completely gone.

As an interesting related note, did you know that electrotherapy was actually started by the ancient Greeks? They used electric eels and rays to shock people with high voltage to cure various diseases. Modern medicine is still trying to catch up with what has been known for thousands of years.