Brian F. Redman 257 Conspiracy for the Day -- August 26, 1993 26 Aug 1993 07:51 Brian F. Redman: Conspiracy for the Day -- August 26, 1993 [Followups to alt.conspiracy] Conspiracy for the Day -- August 26, 1993 =========================================== ("Quid coniuratio est?") ----------------------------------------------------------------- Challenge to Deconstructionism by Webster G. Tarpley [Excerpts, from the August 9, 1993, issue of "The New Federalist" ] ^^^^^^^^ Currently, education and intellectual life in the United States and many other countries are being destroyed by the triple plague of political correctness, postmodernism, and deconstructionism. After the collapse of Marxism in much of the world, the forces of evil in philosophy and epistemology are now increasingly arrayed under the banner of deconstructionism, which offers a place of regroupment for fascists, communists, irrationalists, and bankrupt ideologues of every sort. If you were wondering what the face of the enemy looked like after the fall of the Berlin Wall, this is it. The leading purveyor of deconstructionism, the Frenchman Jacques Derrida, is now unquestionably the most celebrated and influential academic philosopher in the world today. As I will try to show, the continued intellectual hegemony of deconstructionism in schools and universities amounts to a death sentence for human civilization as we have known it. Deconstructionism in the academy and in government is a direct threat to the lives of a very large portion of the 5.3 billion human beings now inhabiting this planet. 1. The modern campus is now the bastion of euphemism and absurd circumlocution. Karl Marx had demagogically promised that his philosophy would change the world; the deconstructionists only want to change all the names. There is no more right or wrong, good or evil, only appropriate and inappropriate. Language is supposedly being purged of ableism, ageism, borealocentrism, ethnocentricity, Eurocentricity, hegemonism, heightism, logocentrism, lookism, phallocentrism, racism, sexism, scentism and smellism. Nobody is fat; they only possess an alternative body image. The bald must be called "follicularly challenged" or "differently hirsute." To be dirty is to be "hygienically challenged," to be tall is to be "vertically endowed." If you're old, you become "chronologically gifted." It will be noted that this supposed rebellion afflicts language with all of the horrors of the worst Pentagon bureaucratic prose. Think of "collateral damage" when targets were "serviced" during the Gulf war, killing innocent civilians. "Ethnic cleansing" is a politically correct term for genocide. Thus, political correctness offers no hope to the homeless, but it demands they be called "underhoused," "involuntarily undomiciled," or "houseless." The jobless become "non-renewed." Political correctness is radical nominalism, in which the verbal signs take the place of ideas and things. As always, this radical nominalism is never very far from paranoid schizophrenia, where the victim believes that by changing the name or sign, he has altered reality itself. As the experience of Baroque Europe (Lyly, Marino, etc.) shows, such ways of talking go together with the collapse of civilization. 2. Political correctness insists that everything in human affairs can be reduced to race, sex (or "gender"), socioeconomic class, and choice of sexual perversion ("sexual orientation"). *The New York Times* now recognizes a minimum of five sexes, and the coprophiles and sadomasochists insist on their rights. The pessimistic p.c. litany is all strictly determinist, denying humanity any freedom: You are, they say, what your race, sex, class, and [sexual orientation] make you. You are a slave to that; there is no freedom... Here there can be no *imago viva Dei* to express the creative faculties that all human beings share. 3. Countries that permit deconstructionists to assume power over the government (and this has gone quite far in the U.S.A.) are not likely to survive. Political correctness attempts to define a "canon" of what is to be studied, seeking to purge the Dead White European Males (DWEMS) in favor of Rigoberta Menchu, Franz Fanon, Jean Genet, or Antonin Artaud [BR -- Note, Artaud wrote an interesting essay titled "Van Gogh, the Man Suicided by the Society," which I previously posted in 2 parts. I may do a rerun of the Artaud essay in the future]... This [elimination of DWEMS] is a demand to wipe out the progress made by science in western continental Europe, especially Germany, France, Italy, Holland, etc., since the Italian Golden Renaissance of the 1400s. If Nicholas Cusanus, Leonardo da Vinci, Kepler, Leibniz, Monge, Gauss, Pasteur, Riemann, Cantor, and other Platonics were wiped out, we could no longer maintain the survival of the 5.3 billion human beings of today. Without the scientific achievement of these DWEMS, the relative potential population density of the world would fall back to the levels of the 1300s, to the time of the Bubonic Plague. We might go all the way back to the Roman Empire. Most of the 5.3 billion who manage to hang on today would be doomed. -+- Postmodernism -+- Many people who observe the lunatic pageant of the modern campus may conclude that the professors and administrators are all crazy. So they are. But there is a definite method in the madness, a philosophical system or doctrine which dictates the specific policy demands of political correctness. One generic name for this is postmodernism, which claims that the raving irrationalists Voltaire, Rousseau, and the rest of the Enlightenment were the Age of Reason, but that now the Age of Unreason is upon us. [Deconstructionism] began its triumphal march through American universities in 1966, when Derrida appeared at Johns Hopkins University to tell American academics that the structuralism of Levi-Strauss was dead and that the future belonged to deconstruction. Derrida is now stronger in the U.S.A. and the Anglo-American sphere than in France, and dominant in much of Ibero-America, Francophone Africa and the Middle East, and eastern Europe. If you want tenure, an endowed chair, a foundation grant, government financing, you have to learn to talk the pedantic deconstructionist gibberish. Deconstructionists are like the cynics and skeptics of the ancient world in that they, like Diogenes and Pyrrho, refuse to profess or affirm a doctrine of their own, but only negate the ideas of others. Deconstruction is very eclectic. Derrida's world of ideas can be compared to a great sewer into which empty the various gutters and waste waters of the past two or three centuries. Each of these channels contributes to the great Cloaca Maxima of deconstruction. Note that we are here reviewing the disastrous state of human knowledge as we go towards the year 2000. -+- Hatred of Reason -+- Deconstructionism is an attack on Judaeo-Christian western European civilization powered above all by rage. Derrida hates and resents reason and creativity, which he identifies with the "epoch of Christian creationism and infinitism when these appropriate the resources of Greek conceptuality." (*Of Grammatology*, p. 13). Western European culture is guilty of logocentrism, says Derrida. The western cultural paradigm always aspired to be based on reason. This must be rejected. The western cultural paradigm also gives priority to speech, to the spoken word, with most literature made to be read aloud or even sung, from Plato's dialogues to Dante and Chaucer to Shakespeare and Schiller. This is the hated "phonocentrism" which Derrida also wants to get rid of. Derrida delves into Plato in an attempt to show that the overtones of the Logos are exclusively paternal and male dominated, giving rise to the further charge of phallologocentrism, which soon enough gives rise to the notion of "phallocentrism" assailed by the maenads of feminist literary theory. [Derrida concludes that] the real problem with the West is that our culture is entirely permeated by what he calls "metaphysics. "... For Derrida, metaphysics evidently means anything that cannot be boiled down to sense certainty. Derrida sees "metaphysics" as the principal enemy to be destroyed. Under the heading of metaphysics he lumps God, the self or soul or individual, causality, substance, essence, action, and most other concepts of any importance. They must go, for reasons that are never remotely explained. For Derrida, the author is dead, by definition. He never existed. The human self and ego have collapsed into an X marking the spot where they once were... All that Derrida will talk about is a text, a written text of black on white, with punctuation, type faces, paragraphs, margins, colphons, logos, copyrights and so forth... Everything is a written text in the sense that every thought, utterance or "discourse" is a story that we tell each other about something which exists in the most detached way in a written form. Therefore, says Derrida, there is nothing outside of the text. Everything is a text. There are no more works of art. All black writing on white paper is a text -- Shakespeare, the telephone book, Mickey Mouse, the racing form... all are texts, each one equivalent to the other. -+- Deconstructionism's Targets -+- Deconstructionists can target any of the written documents which are constituve of civilization itself. Take theology... Deconstructionist theology is quite a feat, since the ban on metaphysics means that this will be a theology without God. [Deconstructionist theologian Mark C. Taylor overcomes this difficulty as follows:] "One of the distinctive features of deconstruction is its willingness to confront the death of God squarely if not always directly...it would not be too much to suggest that deconstruction is the 'hermeneutic' of the death of God." Taylor calls for "the death of God, erasure of the self, and [an] end to history." Since deconstruction sees all writing as the same, it can also be unleashed in the field of law, with devastating effect. Listen to Clare Dalton of the Critical Legal Studies group at Harvard Law School: "Law," she writes, "like every other cultural institution, is a place where we tell one another stories about our relationships with ourselves, one another, and authority."... Sanford Levinson, professor of constitutional law at the University of Texas at Austin, chimes in: "The death of 'constitutionalism' may be the central event of our time, just as the death of God was that of the past century..." The Clinton White House is redolent of deconstructionism and political correctness. The Clinton Cabinet is dysfunctional, but it certainly respects the distributive requirements of race/sex/class/sexual [orientation]... Donna Shalala of HHS helped to promulgate a code on offensive speech at the University of Wisconsin... Vice President Gore's favorite book is reportedly Thomas Kuhn's *Structure of Scientific Revolutions*, which has become a manual for New Age paradigm shifters. We appeal to all of those who share our regard for the potential of the human mind to join us in exposing and defeating the deconstructionists. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe to the LaRouche mailing list, send a message to listserv@ccs.covici.com with a line saying "subscribe lar-lst" You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF lar-lst" command to listserv@ccs.covici.com. Please note that it is impossible for anybody to determine that you are signed up to the list through the use of the "REVIEW" command. REVIEW has been disabled for this list. [B.R. I don't agree with everything they say, but I recommend this mailing list as a good alternative news source.] ----------------------------------------------------------------- "The New Federalist" is published weekly. Subscriptions are available at $20 for 50 issues, $35 for 100 issues. Make checks payable to "New Federalist" at New Federalist, PO Box 889, Leesburg, VA 22075. ----------------------------------------------------------------- PSYOPS- HTTP://WWW.TELEPORT.COM/~WALTER _______________________________________ blast trauma data fer social dissection made available to: realpolitic junkies, info tyros, kultur buzzards & da masses ======================================= FBI-CIA-KGB-NSA-BCCI-DIA-DEA-FEMA-THULE KKK-CONTRA-JFK-RFK-MLK-MKULTRA-LAROUCHE COINTELPRO-ILLUMINATI-P2-CFR-ADL-MOSSAD BLUEBIRD-OSS-ONI-SOE-BIS-AIDS-ARTICHOKE OTO-OCCULT-NEA-BILDERBERGER-40 CTTE-SLA VELIKOVSKY-SDI-INSLAW-TESLA-TSS-CROWLEY JIM JONES-GURDJIEFF-ABWEHR-T4-WACO-BATF EFF-PGP-RHIC/EDOM-PANDORA-CAN-TAVISTOCK ENIGMA-BEARDEN-GEHLEN-SPETZNAZ-EUGENICS MASONS-ODESSA-WFMH-IRS-MI5-FOIA-TRILATS
(CNN) -- A cryptography expert says that Microsoft operating systems include a back door that allows the National Security Agency to enter systems using one of the operating system versions.
full article:
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/03/windows.nsa/
Remote Procedure Call-RPC
Hmmm looks like this is something built into the operating system which can not be turned off. Figures it couldn't be as easy as I asumed...
So using micro crash software - we are always wide open to governmental spying of anything we have on our computers or personal home networks....
Well at lease we know now, or I sould say I know now. Those F***ers!
-Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
-Provides the endpoint mapper and other miscellaneous RPC services.
I have 15 to 20 dependancies including my virus checker and the windows firewall using the RPC - there is no way my computer would run if I turned this function off ---- or if it did I would be FAR worse off....
No if you use windows - there is a back door built in and you can not close it. This is clear to even me - a non programmer....
Makes sense as well - I just ass-umed that something like that would not be done.... silly me ... I never seem to learn - sometimes optimism is foolish :)
TheObserver
This is the future,beyond Orwellian,beyond mere slavery,total genocide of culture and race and individuality. And its here now. One amorphous blob assimilating everything.Total Kaos as culture,religion,nationality,race. Violence as sport no doubt. Rb
----------------------
WOW - sorry I posted it if it caused a reaction like that.
I found it interesting - I did not even realise it until I read that - I mean - like it is there and you see it but you don't uderstand what the undercurrent is...
I find it very important to NEVER fear information - or what could be etc...
NEVER FEAR!
oh and did I mention to never fear? :0)
How to not fear?
Glad you asked....
for answer
simply ask yourself and even if you are 100% out of tune - the answer will come to you just out of the blue.....
pretty cool - like having your own fortune teller inside your head :)
but I saw on TV crazy people hear voices!!!!!! Yikes I am even more scared!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
maybe
TV
is
the
biggest
brain washing
tool
ever used
in the
history of man kind!
Is this possible???????????????????
maybe?
mmmmhaahhahaahahah