Actually, the Declaration of Independence was put forth as a legal document justifying the breakaway of the colonies from British colonial rule. Though it is not considered a document of law today it nevertheless was the clear guiding force behind the Constitution that was written to secure the rights declared in the DOI.
It is not really fair to judge the founding of America based on our concept of liberty and equal rights today, BNG. Instead, you have to you consider the times when our government was founded. The practice of slavery was hardly a universally condemned act at the time. Slavery has in fact endured among mankind from the beginning of recorded history and surely before. It was the "enlightened" European slave traders, usually with the cooperation of the African tribes themselves who provided and sold the slaves to the traders, that brought slavery to the colonies and kept it flourishing.
Though it is no justification for slavery ever existing in America, slavery existed in Africa before the arrival of the Europeans and endures to this very day.
Not giving women the right to vote may not have been very enlightened but neither was it out of pace with the rest of the world either. To condemn the US for that oversight is no more valid than condemning the Bible because women were considered mere property during that time.
The founding of America, however flawed due to the temprocentristic attitudes regarding slavery and women and considerations of self-interest inherrent in most endeavors by man, was nevertheless a bold and shining moment in history by a group of radical and progressive thinkers.
DQ
Yes, I am very familiar with history and agree that it was far from a cut and dried issue. Which is why I said that slavery was not universally condemned - a far cry from saying that it was universally accepted, or even accepted by a clear majority.
Likewise the great myth of "the war to free the slaves" was anything but that. The issue of slavery was a side issue which was used as an emotional tool in a war to establish a strong central government and do away with state's sovereignty.
An ideal solution to the civil war would have been an agreement to abolish slavery along with an agreement to recognize the sovereignty of individual states and reinforcement of the concept of a weak federal government which served primarily to insure the protection of life and property as well as smooth commerce and relations between the states.
The stronger the central government the less individual freedom and the greater the turn towards socialism or fascism. The ONLY exception is a benevolent monarchy and those rarely exist and never last.
DQ
That is certainly what they teach in Communism 101 - just like they teach that the great revolution in Russia freed the people from the evil Czar so that they could enjoy the utopia of socialism by stand in line for hours for a loaf of bread (sorry - only one choice of brands) and have informers and party agents in every block, tenement and factory.
When it comes to the shaping of America, of course there were monied interests and landowners who played a part - but that does not dispel the facts of the free thinkers and radicals who declared all citizens equal with unalienable rights and a government that derived it's power from the consent of the governed.
Unless you meant that the Revolutionary War was fought for the old New World Order which was the British, that could not have been. The colonies were very lucky that Britain, France and Spain were occupied with their centuries power struggles. It would be almost another 150 years before we were any kind of world power.
DQ