People have been posting in the Urine Therapy Support Forum that Moreless is against UT ingestion because of NPN protein. I'd like to understand more of the rational behind that anti-UT position and find out from the Moreless believers what it means. There is no way I'm going to search through the Moreless Forum for that information. They are the ones who entered the UT Support group to expound it and I feel that it is their place to expand on it. If it is as simple as those that believe it indicate it is, then they should be able to present the information on the debate forum.
Thank you.
Moreless' responses are totally presumptive with no basis of fact.
His response about babies floating in urine also has no basis in fact. None, zero. His statement that the fetus would abort is in total disagreement with his reason for bashing urine in the first place. By his reasoning, all urine has significant NPN.
Even worse, his comments regarding human milk is irrational. The milk was taken from 24 healthy women, not sick women as Moreless implies. He doesn't even address the soy milk (double the NPN of human milk). He can't stand the fact that today there are millions and millions of fetuses inhaling urine and even more babies than that ingesting human milk - all with NPN in it.
His answers establish his status as a genuine quack. And that isn't emotional. That is reality.
One of the things that I've found with many alternative practitioners is that they have never had to stand up to a review of any kind, particularly a peer review. The just vomit out information. Once in a while you find a good one, but compared to those trained in real schools and real life learning situations, they can't hold a candle to them. And I'm not limiting that to MDs either.
If you accept those answers as "fact" - you are in a sad state of affairs. You are just a sheepie being fleeced.