http://kdka.com/national/blind.paper.money.2.728307.html

May 20, 2008 10:48 am US/Eastern

WASHINGTON (AP) ― The U.S. discriminates against blind people by printing paper money that makes it impossible for them to distinguish the bills' value, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

What this opening salvo does not clarify is how, historically, the U.S. has been using the power of it's paper money system to discriminate against different types of blind people distinguishing the bills' lack of value. The article goes on to say -

The ruling upholds a decision by a lower court in 2006. It could force the Treasury Department to redesign its money. Suggested changes have ranged from making bills different sizes to printing them with raised markings.

On the front end of this courtly decision, one must wonder why the collective U.S. system needed close to a century in order to find its salt, its judicial ass, the judicial wherewithal to first recognize so as to notice, then consider, and finally act upon the discriminatory nature of the paper money system being used at its own insistence during this interval; 95 years.

The traditional billing affixed to this sort of collective deliberative body system has long been premised on and steeped in an assortment of assertions, to include accolades; such as, that this system has raised itself to the level of a hallowed institution in no small part based upon the supposed saintly merits of its track record and reputation with things of legitimate law & justice. The collective system continually speaks of its never-ending pursuit to appoint onto and into itself the operatives ..... employees..... administrators .... officers and the like to fill out and number among its rank, people of highest human character possessing exceptional capacity for knowing how to recognize & identify injustice when it sees such, quickly, faithfully, without prejudice, and without fail, and is subsequently keen to timely administer genuine justice & law accordingly.

Meanwhile, people at large generally capable of applying a nominal amount of legitimate critical thinking to a subject at hand - like a track record raised to the level of an institution, are likely to end up thinking in terms of record short time, amazingly quick time for humans ... that kind of track record stuff. One must wonder if any of the ancient Greek, Roman, Egyptian or Babylonian gods - upon which the present collective U.S. system has been built, ever required a century to complete one single lap around a given track in coming to attain their particular godly lore & status? This conjures up the image of such a track race starting out with a Howard Cosell -the first, announcing the event via radio "and there off, folks, this great race has begun" .... and then 95 years later Howard Cosell - the third, announces to a weary audience via satellite TV hard wired into the heads of interested viewers "and here they come folks .... look at that little monkey run! .... my grand daddy would have been proud .... look! .... yes....I think he's going to make it.....(anticipation).... Steven Wannamaker, human chariot of fire that his is, is the first to break the tape and cross the line....quick check of the time clock (more anticipation) .... YES! .... he DiD IT FOLKS!!!! , and THAT is how it goes, Steve Wannamaker has just completed the race in world record time of 95 YEARS!". A body that just today announced via headlines that it required nearly a century to act upon a matter of quintessential injustice indicates that A) yawn, any legitimate records worth speaking of are still safe, B) such a deliberative body, by clear example, is not capable or qualified to find its own law & justice ass with both hands, C), whatever it found in this instance, over the course of 95 years no less, using its very own two genuine-law-and-justice hands as it were, was likely to have been yet another exemplary rendition of a botched act at that.....just another display of the U.S.' collective skill in corrupted incompetence. We need look no further than the back end of this courtly decision.

Talk about the phenom of a person - real or fictional as the case may be, talking to itself. The US' court by way of the U.S.' very own news-headline-making subsystem, now talking (apparently to itself) of the grave need to craft a new design of paper money "with raised marks". Who or what said so?; The U.S. Court. Court: Paper Money Discriminates Against The Blind

Who or what is the U.S. Court? It is an implement of the collective U.S., an implement comprised of fictional entities as well as the occasional real, flesh & blood persons. Who or what did the court tell its decision to? The U.S. WASHINGTON (AP) ― The U.S. discriminates against blind people by printing paper money that makes it impossible for them to distinguish the bills' value, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday. Here we have it, prima facie evidence that the U,.S. is talking to itself, and, by way of CBS, is apparently attempting to indicate it has been listening to itself ....it is answering back, to itself. The U.S. acknowledges that the design hinders blind people but it argued they had adapted -some relied on store clerks for help, some used credit cards and others folded certain corners to help distinguish the bills. When one considers that CBS is itself no rinky dink implement, one that has no few people numbering among it's audience, this then is a situation of the U.S. attempting to talk to itself, and answer back AND many other real flesh & blood people by way of CBS are attempting to listen in on this conversation; crazy is as crazy does. Those of you following at home are advised not to try this yourself. The average person caught attempting to talk to themselves, and subsequently answer themselves, quite often is locked up in institutions .... other institutions, like institutions for the insane, not to be confused with institutions of the collective U.S. such as the institution of law, justice, courts and media .... that kind of institution stuff. It goes without saying but will be said nonetheless that the average person that gets caught talking to themselves AND is subsequently locked up in an insane institution is more often than not a real, flesh & blood type of person. Everybody knows that when it is the corporate fictional U.S. entity attempting to do the very same that the average sane flesh & blood person gets locked up as insane, the U.S. does not lock itself up in an institution for the insane. Instead, it locks itself up in the collective institution named U.S., wherein it then gets to fabricate, control and administer most of the institutions, like, the institution for passing paper money for a century as though real money, like, the institution for passing judgment as though real law & justice. Then it gets to come out the back end of its own courtly decision pretending to smell like the veritable rose for having pulled such the obvious 180. To the back end of this courtly decision, Batman!

One must wonder why the U.S. Court of Appeal's decision favors only those physically blind but does nothing of genuine worth - except exacerbate, the situation for those who are mentally blind to the nature of the current paper money system. By it's own headlines, the U.S. is announcing a decision of it's court deciding against a form of discrimination all the while this very decision is itself another clear act of discrimination. That is quite the richly ironic decision!