http://www.iconmag.co.uk/page.php?n=319

Thanks for the post James but,

I am sorry to disagree, this idea is a bit too rigid to go uncorrected.

There are many causes for cancer. If a person happened to find the cause of their cancer, that does not mean it is the cause of all cancers of that type.

In 1902 Dr John Beard of the University of Edinburgh in Scotland proposed the Trophoblast Theory of Cancer. That theory has never been disproved. In March 2004, it gained support in the most prestigious conventional cancer medical journal, the Cancer Journal. The trophoblast theory of cancer states that a tumor is actually the result of fast-growing healing cells (trophoblast cells) that our body failed to turn off. Trophoblast cells appear at the sight of injury or other damage. They "patch up" the damaged area enough to allow more complicated cells to start growing such as liver or kidney cells.

The process that kills the fast growing healing cells is controlled by our pancreas. The nutrients that our pancreas needs to function well is in small supply in our modern diet and the work the pancreas needs to perform is greatly increased by the excess grains we eat. When our pancreas runs down, it can’t turn off all the healing cells and a tumor starts. So you see that anything that causes repeated damage can cause cancer.

You can read more about this theory here:

http://trophoblast-theory-of-cancer.com/


So please be careful, what should have been said was that dairy can cause cancer in some people.

One of the insidious things about cancer is that once it is started, it often continues even if the cause is removed. Professor Plant was fortunate that she had a strong pancreas that was able to remove the cancer after the cause of HER cancer was removed. Many people are not so fortunate and cancer continues even when the cause is removed. This is often seen with lung cancer due to smoking. Wouldn’t it be great if you could cure such cancer by simply stopping smoking?