OK naravahanadata,

but don't forget to contact Tony Isaacs on his own forum from the link I gave you. He is very knowledgeable about successful treatments of cancers. He is your best option by far.

Regards

Chrisb1.

It's hard enough knowing that fasting can help others who are still stuck in the indoctrination of medical science, but when it becomes personal it's almost unbearable. I watched a friend barely survive bowel cancer ending up with an illeostomy bag after the operation, only to be struck down by liver, hip cancer and finally a brain tumour three years later which of course was the end of it all. I am not the type to go preaching about the wonders of this or that and there was no way I could have convinced her to go against her doctors and family anyway, though I already knew of the benefits of fasting before her first operation. If I had of had access to some of the literature about it I do now I would have felt better that at least I'd been able to give her enough information on it to make an informed choice instead of just having to take the word of a radical non conforming friend.

It's hard to avoid the 'if only..' thoughts and equally hard not to end up despising the system which keeps such knowledge from being accepted publicly.

However it works out Vanda I hope your brother gets through this.

Take care,

Andrew.

Shelton states the opposite bling, that fasting will give the body the opportunity to feed off the cancerous growths. I myself believe that it both starves the cancer and feeds off the protein that makes it up at the same time. I believe myself that our diet is far too abundant in foods and nutrients that we just don't need, either in quantity or in quality. But we don't give our bodies the opportunity either to dump what isn't suitable to sustain our lives so the body tries to store it- but again much of it is just so alien to our bodies that it really doesn't know what to do with it. And cancer has to feed off something right, it doesn't just spontaneously grow out of nothing, nor does it eat our flesh or bones or organs, not to begin with, so it must be feeding off something we provide it with from outside. I believe that if we just ate the foods our bodies were designed to survive on there would be nothing left to feed cancerous growths. Maybe that's a bit too simplistic a view in these scientific days though.

Anyway, I know Shelton didn't differentiate between the type of growths, he said that the body feeds off tumors for their protein, and anything that is not part of or needed for the function of our body is used as food while fasting. That includes any type of cancer. The only question is whether the damage is too much to repair before we give it the chance to begin.

I'm sorry to hear about your father in law bling. It's funny how quickly cancer has become something 'not to be bothered' about. It's just so prevalent now that it's become part of all our lives. We all know someone who's going through chemo now, or has done in the past, or who never made it, and most of us have experienced all these things. If only more people would start asking why these things are so common, why civilisation has so much more disease than is found in nature. While the status quo is the most important thing in the world these things will just never be questioned on a major scale I don't think.

Andrew.

Bling,
for everyones information and with regard to any cancer, Dr Shelton has this to say..............................


"There are those who ask: "Can Fasting cure a cancer?"
My answer is that while I have seen cancerous growths greatly reduced in size during a fast, I have never seen one eliminated completely."
Fasting Can Save Your Life ....Shelton...P40.

"While the concept of the autonomy of cancerous growths can be overworked, it is true that is some cases, they do persist in growing, even through a long fast. In other cases the cancerous growth is greatly reduced in size, although I have never seen one totally obliterated by fasting. BENIGN tumours on the other hand are frequently completelty broken down and absorbed."
Fasting Can Save Your Life ...Shelton...Page 41.


Further..........
"A small tumorous growth which had existed for more than twenty years was absorbed during Mr. Pearson's longest fast and did not return thereafter. Dr. Hazzard records the recovery, during a fifty-five days' fast, of a case diagnosed by physicians as cancer of the stomach. Tilden, Weger, Rabagliati and many others record many such cases.
I have seen repeated instances of the absorption of tumors in my own patients. I had one complete recovery in the case of a uterine cancer during a thirty days' fast. I have seen numerous small tumors completely absorbed and large ones greatly reduced in size.
In Europe and America, literally thousands of tumors have been autolyzed during the past fifty years, and the effectiveness of the method is beyond doubt. I can give no definite information about bone tumors and nerve tumors; but, since these are subject to the same laws of nutrition as all other tumors, I am disposed to think that they may be autolyzed as effectively as other tumors.
In my own experience I have seen numerous fibroid tumors of the uterus and breast, lipomas in various parts of the body, a few epitheliomas, a whole group of myomas and a number of tumors that were apparently early cancer autolyzed and absorbed while the patient fasted. I have seen many warts disappear during fasting and I have seen many warts on which the fasting process seemed to have no effect. I have never seen a mole affected by the fasting process. I have seen a number of cysts completely destroyed by fasting and others that were merely reduced in size. It will be recalled that Graham mentions having seen cysts (wens) absorbed during fasting.
It is certain that the autolyzing process has its limitations. For example, a tumor that has been permitted to grow to enormous size cannot be autolyzed in one fast. Indeed, many of them are so large that several long fasts during the course of two years or more, with a rigid feeding schedule between fasts, would be required to break them down and absorb them, if, indeed, it could be done. There was a school in Chicago some years ago that taught that "the normal tissue may be consumed before the morbid tissues are used up," in fasting. While this school did not confine this statement to tumors, there are few conditions in which this can be a fact, and in large tumors it may be so. Aside from large tumors, it is hardly probable that this is so in any recoverable cases. Only in rare instances, where the amount of morbid tissue is very great, and these are probably all irremediable, can this occur.
In general, good tissue is not used up as fast as bad and the tumor will "starve" before the body. Except where it is very large, we may be sure that in all cases, hunger will return before any damage is done to the vital tissues. In more than one case of cancer, where opiates had been used to relieve pain, I have seen three or four days' fasting bring relief.
One other limitation must be noted; namely, tumors that are so situated that they dam-up the lymph stream will continue to grow (feeding upon the excess of lymph behind them) despite fasting.
In cases where complete absorption is not obtained, the tumor is sufficiently reduced in size not to constitute a menace. Thereafter proper living will prevent added growth. Indeed, we have seen a number of cases where a further decrease in size followed right living subsequent to fasting."

http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/0201hyglibcat/020127shelton.III/020127.ch5.htm


Fuhrman is right though. Fasting has the most success with BENIGN tumours, but not altogether with malignant forms.
And yes, fasting always makes the case of advanced and terminal patients much more comfortable. This was also Tildens experience as well.

Regards

Chrisb1.