In terms of money, currency, finances and such, have you ever stopped to think about why our money is called a one dollar bill, or 5 dollar bill, or 10 dollar bill, etc? In terms of money, currency, finances and such, what is a bill? When you receive a bill in the mail, like monthly bills, from the electric company, credit card company, telephone company, auto loan company, mortgage company, tax collector, and the like, what does this mean; bill? Does this not mean you owe somebody a debt? Is the word bill in this context generally one and the same with debt? For example, when you get the monthly electric bill and the paperwork for the bill indicates, for instance, the bill for this month is $75.00, does this not mean you owe a debt of $75.00 to the electric company? Utility companies make a good example for sake of discussion.
For many years, as a convenience to the people, there have been alternate payment centers set up all around the country for people to take care of their utility bills in person. Around these parts, for many years there was such an alternate payment center housed within the local Sears & Roebuck outlet. I do not know if that center still operates, but over the years, other alternate payment centers have sprung up. Several stores in this area - for instance the combo grocery / drug stores that are common these days, will now accept payment in person for various types of utility bills. Some of these will only accept payments on behalf of specific utility companies, while other stores will accept payments on behalf of other utility companies. The point is, these centers exist. In fact I have been making somewhat regular use of them for various personal reasons. Anyway, the question remains: how is it that I get a $75.00 bill from the electric company, I go down to the local grocery /drug store, I hand them the copy of the bill, plus I hand them 3-20 dollar bills, 1-10 dollar bill, and 1-5 dollar bill, they take this, count it, stamp the copy of the bill, hand me back a copy of the receipt paid, and that is pretty much it... as far as I can tell, everybody (the principals) involved are okay with this system. The question remains: how is it that I am billed $75.00 by an entity, for which I then hand over 5 bills in exhange, and seemingly everybody involved is okay with this?
This has been and continues to be just one among the many mysteries I've been contemplating for a while. There are some clues that I've stumbled upon and continue to stumble upon as I go along. Some times these clues sort of accumulate enough that they help provide at least a framework of some understanding, but you know how these things go. Many if not most of us are often surrounded with stray clues and snippets of explanations floating around, but other than these odd clues floating around for us to either ignore or pay some attention to as the case may be, that's pretty much all we have to go on, to guide us. I mean, I say this in comparison to, for instance, the situation whereby it seems pretty clear to me that we do not often need to worry about the problem of too many people waiting in line to explain to us in full detail these mysteries that surround us. For some reason there does not seem to be a concerted effort, for instance, a whole bunch of schools, television stations or other interested parties to swamp us all with informative, educating information to help solve some of these kinds of fundamental mysteries. Anyway, a relevant clue in this case can be found on dollar bills themselves.
Stamped in small font but unmistakable plain English is a caveat that upon contemplation of seems to be implying that our dollar bills, our system of money, currency at that, $1s, $5s, $10s, $20s, $50s, and $100s, all of them alike, represent debt. Compare this to a previous era when the statement engraved on our currency stated that the bearer of said note could exchange the note for equivalent value in gold or silver, on demand. In the current era, the clue is that these bills are designed to point out that they are to be accepted for all debts public and private. This still does not explain how or why debt collectors generally seem to be okay with accepting bills for payments of bills. I'm not making this up. Look it up! I'm just thinking otu loud, trying to make some sense out of all of this currency system. These dollar bills are also referred to as notes. Many years ago, if I showed up late for school or left early, teachers might get upset unless I handed them a note from somebody else, after which the teachers were then seemingly okay with this. The power of notes, eh?
In the old Christmas movie there is the famous line "every time a bell rings, an angel gets it's wings". There is another line that says that every time a dollar bill is exhanged for all debts private or public, the Federal Reserve earns a royalty. Since they own the patent to FRNs, they exact a useage fee each and every time one of their dollar bills is officially recorded as having been exhanged for all debts private and public. It eventually becomes more clear that these notes have since there inception been intended to manifest as debt. The system that puts these notes into circulation requires that the production of these notes incur a debt, in the form of interest, for services rendered, you see? This guarantees that the amount of debt attached to the notes will always be more than the face value of the total notes in circulation; debt. There is a related mystery; the notion of a nation so saddled with debt from the long term habitual use of exchanging patented money notes that it can spend it's way out of debt and back into prosperity by way of circulating more and more of these notes which of course necessitates more and more debt being generated in order to manufacture more and more of these notes for circulation. From where or how, theoretically, comes the money to pay the interest on these loans, I may never know, but this kind of interest is interesting to me. It is even more interesting that I may never know how or where the additional money is to come from to pay for the additional royalties racked up each and every time a FRN is officially registered as having been used "spent" for all debts public and private. While the people at large can no longer exhange these notes for silver or gold on demand, the FRB requires that the interest paid to it for having produced these notes must be paid in gold. So, on the one hand, dollar bills are seemingly okay to be exchanged for paying certain kinds of debts, light bills... "lite bills", if you will, just not okay for paying the kind of heavy bills racked up through the many years of having created the dollar bills themselves. Isn't that something? The producers, the very copyright patent owners of these dollar bills allow these bills to be exchanged with pretty much the entire spectrum of debt collectors .... EXCEPT themselves. By implicatin this seems to be teh FRB's way of saying that it does not have much faith in it's own dollar bill product.... the veritable hall monitor who will not accept their own note. That is some exceptionally interesting interest.
Main Entry: 1bill pronunciation: \ˈbil\ Function: noun Etymology: Middle English bile, from Old English; akin to Old English bill Date: before 12th century
Main Entry: bill of attainder Date: 1820
Main Entry: 3bill Function: noun Etymology: Middle English bil, from Old English bill sword; akin to Old High German bill pickax Date: 14th century
Main Entry: 4bill Function: noun Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French & Medieval Latin; Anglo-French bille, from Medieval Latin billa, perhaps alteration of bulla, papal seal, bull — more at bull Date: 14th century
Main Entry: 5bill Function: transitive verb Date: 14th century
Icky, thanks for the advice. That is among the many works on my to-do list for a while... even been on my hard drive for many months.... so many things on the to-do, so little time. In the mean time, here is what to me is a reasonably good picture summary of how the fed system and the fed dollar works. This may not directly explain how it is that we pay bills with bills, but aside from that, there does not seem to be a whole lot of mystery going on here to be seen..... isn't it interesting how the pre-fed dollar lost 50% of it's value between the inception of the fed, through the inception of world war and right up to the very brink of the inception of 'the Great Depression'....but then it sort of got propped back up a little bit for a while, up until right around the time that fdr came along, followed soon after by things like new deals, progressive taxation, escalating world wars. Before the time that Carter had left office, the lion's share of the once mighty dollar had been hollowed out. In other words, since 1980, all this attendant financial gerrymandering and war making emenating from the U.S. that's been going on with great fanfare and splendedly hyped media, has been nothing more than an aftermath of continued slicing, dicing, horse-trading, pillaging, global plundering and haggling over, effectively, the remaining few pennies worth of roar still left in the carcass of that old pride. PS-also note.... (coincidentally as they like to say ;) that same time period - 1970 to 1980 or thereabouts, which signified the point at which the value of the dollar had effectively been hollowed out (nearly in full), just so happens to mark the beginning of the steady rise of our "national debt". Out of all of this, THAT makes perfect sense...... I mean, at that point, with an effectively value-less dollar, what else was there left to happen or to do except begining the steady march to accruing debt?
Just between you and me, I've been getting the idea for a while that the way the federal reserve system works, down to the dollar, is through being made to work....as in, forced to work. Despite the mountain of historical evidence and despite the mountain of good sense to the contrary, it - the fed and it's dollar, is continualy made to work by any means available including brute force if,as and when necessary.
In a similar way, I've been coming to the idea for we people in general. All of us, each in our own ways, are stuck doing whatever it takes to contiue trying to make it work - our world, our nation, our lives, our money, we are stuck trying to some how scotch tape it all together to keep it at least hanging or dangling together loosely at least in coformance to a reasonable facsimile of what we've been trained throughout our lives since birth to believe is our world, our country, our lives and our property. Despite all the mounting great odds, against the incredible evidence mounting to the contrary, we people are conditioned to continue trying to do whatever it takes to make it work, even and especially when this requires us to delude ourselves into make believing it is still somehow working in some or any bizarre way even though the mounting evidence confirms for us again and again to the contrary.