Bang or no bang.
============ =======
1.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a "single point".
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the "single
point".
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a "Big Bang".
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and its temperature will decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the
future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
2.
Detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is
approximately p=10^-30 g/sm3) that the gravitation law
doesn't work. Therefore was invented " dark matter" and
another abstract objects.
The cosmological constant in Universe is zero.
The Universe / Vacuum is endless.
Our tiny minds cannot get a handle on its size,
so we try to give it shapes and boundaries, all of which is folly.
But to our happiness the temperature of Vacuum is concrete.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
3.
About the theory of the "Big Bang" is written the thick (very thick)
books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the "Big Bang".
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
The action, when the God compresses all Universe
into his palm, we have named " a singular point".
And action, when the God opens his palm,
we have named the "Big Bang".
============ ============ ==.
So,
"Bang or no bang"
" To be or not to be? "
that is the question.
/ From Shakespeare with Love./


http://www.socratus.com


http://www.wbabin.net/

Best wishes.



P.S.

Comment.
========..
Hello All
Israel maybe right.
History repeats time and time again.
The First Crisis in Cosmology Conference
Monёc˜ao, Portugal, June 23–25 2005


http://www.americanantigravity.com/documents/Crisis-in-Cosmology-2005-Ratclif...


In May 2004, a group of about 30 concerned scientists
published an open letter to the global scientific community
in New Scientist in which they protested the stranglehold of
Big Bang theory on cosmological research and funding. The
letter was placed on the Internet and rapidly attracted wide
attention. It currently has about 300 signatories representing
scientists and researchers of disparate backgrounds, and has
led to a loose association now known as the Alternative Cosmology Group†.