This is very long, and I don't know if I understand everything that is being said here, but I thought I would pass it on...



Thursday, December 13, 2007
It is starting to hit the fan
It has taken a long while, but the actions of the Jewish Billioniares and their employees are starting to be connected with the Wars for the Jews:

Maureen Dowd on Feith and Wolfowitz, expressly connecting the ScareJew to the lying Zionist intelligence which led directly to the attack on Iran (my emphasis in red):

"Feith’s disdain for diplomacy and his credo that weakness invites aggression were shaped, Ricks reported, by personal history: ‘Like Wolfowitz, Feith came from a family devastated by the Holocaust. His father lost both parents, three brothers, and four sisters to the Nazis.’

Feith told Jeffrey Goldberg in The New Yorker that “My family got wiped out by Hitler, and ... all this stuff about working things out – well, talking to Hitler to resolve the problem didn’t make any sense to me. The kind of people who put bumper stickers on their car that declare that ‘War is not the answer,’ are they making a serious comment? What’s the answer to Pearl Harbor? What’s the answer to the Holocaust?’

What’s the answer to bin Laden? According to Feith, it was an attack on an unrelated dictator. He oversaw the Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group, whose mission was to amp up links between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

It defies reason, but there are still some who think the chuckleheads who orchestrated the Iraq misadventure have wisdom to impart.

The Pentagon neocons dumped Condi Rice out of the loop. Yet, according to Newsweek’s Mike Isikoff, Condi has now offered Wolfie a job. It wasn’t enough that he trashed Iraq and the World Bank. (He’s still larking around town with Shaha, the sweetheart he gave the sweetheart deal to.)

Condi wants Wolfie to advise her on nuclear proliferation and W.M.D. as part of a State Department panel that has access to highly classified intelligence.

Once you’ve helped distort W.M.D. intelligence to trick the country into war, shouldn’t you be banned for life from ever having another top-level government post concerning W.M.D.?"

Gary Hart as much as calls Alan Dershowitz a 'dual loyalist' for Dershie's inane comments on the NIE on Iran. Hart isn’t quite brave enough to take it all the way. He raises the issue, and then dismisses it for no good reason, leaving the motives of Dershowitz – a guy who has just made a big point of crossing a picket line protesting the illegal Israeli settlements – a complete mystery

In Britain, a one-issue guy named David Abrahams has claimed that he gave donations to the Labour party in secret as he did not want “Jewish money and the Labour Party being put together." He is now saying he was misquoted, although the original source for the story stands by it! In other words, he is now conspiring to hide the fact that he conspired to hide a Jewish Conspiracy to influence the Labour Party to engage in a Conspiracy to fight Wars for the Jews.

Anshel Pfeffer writes (in Ha’aretz), in a comment which is eventually unconvincingly dismissive of the Conspiracy theories:

“And although I am of course reluctant to spur on ‘Elders of Zion’ conspiracy theory enthusiasts, we should nonetheless be asking ourselves why there always seem to be Jews around when politics and funny money meet. And the standard excuse, that there are ‘rotten apples in every barrel,’ just won't do, as the involvement of Jews in these cases is hugely disproportionate to their percentage of the population.”

Finally, a comment from Andrew Winkler, completely out of the mainstream but getting closer with each passing day:

“But why, I'm sometimes asked, do I attack all Jews if I honestly only hate those Jews who do evil. Well, it’s only their skinner-box like reaction that makes them feel that way. If Jews weren’t conditioned – through over 1900 years of Talmudian indoctrination and the horror stories of the Holocult – to blindly jump to the defence of any fellow Jew – no matter how bad their sins – there would be far less reason to suspect that those evil actions had anything to do with their Jewish background. The recent debate on the illegal party donations in Britain is a good example. How do the Jewish media react to those reports? Instead of criticising the donations as criminal acts and blaming the donors for giving Jews a bad name, the majority of Jewish media criticise the reports as being motivated by and causal to more anti-Semitism.”

You may perhaps note that the mainstreaming of truth connects directly to perceptions of power. The American Establishment made a huge power play in releasing the NIE on Iran, and the predictable neocon reactions to it, reactions which were once treated as gospel truth, are suddenly being treated with disdain. Power is shifting away from the Jewish Billionaires, and the old slurs are no longer working. I’ve been saying for a long time that the wider Jewish community had to get in front of this thing, but it may now be too late.

We're still waiting for the levee to break, but you have to admit that the water is getting awfully high.

posted at 2:24 AM permanent link Comments (48) | Trackback
Wednesday, December 12, 2007
Lobelessness and inbreeding

David Irving notes that a picture of convicted fraudster Conrad Black reveals that Black lacks ear lobes (see also here). Grays (aliens) lack ear lobes. So does Lord Lucan (wherever he is). Since having ear lobes is a dominant characteristic, lacking ear lobes is probably a sign of generations of inbreeding, which may also explain the propensity to criminal behavior.


posted at 2:01 AM permanent link Comments (185) | Trackback
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
American Holocaust

I’ll bet you naively thought that the American Holocaust was causing the ‘excess deaths’ of 1.2 million (or so) Semites in Iraq (the most important ‘anti-Semitic’ act which counts these days, and one that is clearly of absolutely no moral concern whatsoever to 99.9% of Americans). If you thought that, you’d be wrong (see also here).


posted at 2:21 AM permanent link Comments (141) | Trackback
Monday, December 10, 2007
Funny pictures, funny research

For some reason, there are an enormous number of unflattering pictures of Hillary Clinton, and somebody has assembled a gallery (these are the legitimate ones: the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy’ has photoshopped a lot more). Needless to say, this is my favorite. Apropos of nothing, and via the Angry Arab News Service, here is an article on the sausage-making involved in celebrity academic research:

“Dershowitz generally employs one or two full-time researchers, three or four part-timers, and a handful of students who do occasional work – all paid at $11.50 per hour. (Since Dershowitz doesn’t get enough in the $7,500/year research budget the law school accords him, he often has to pay that hourly rate out of his own pocket.) Several students who have worked with him describe his hiring practices as almost arbitrary – barely looking at résumés, hiring anyone who asks him for a job, sometimes having his wife interview applicants, and often forgetting those who’ve worked with him in the past. One long-serving researcher was a local high-school student.

Several of his researchers say that Dershowitz doesn’t subscribe to the scholarly convention of researching first, then drawing conclusions. Instead, as a lawyer might, he writes his conclusions, leaving spaces where he’d like sources or case law to back up a thesis. On several occasions where the research has suggested opposite conclusions, his students say, he has asked them to go back and look for other cases, or simply to omit the discrepant information. ‘That’s the way it’s done; a piecemeal, ass-backwards way,’ says one student who has firsthand experience with the writing habits of Dershowitz and other tenured colleagues. ‘They write first, make assertions, and farm out [the work] to research assistants to vet it. They do very little of the research themselves.’

When one student couldn’t find a desired source for an HLS professor’s project, a Harvard research librarian commented, ‘Isn’t that the opposite of how you’re supposed to do it?’”

This probably explains the “Case for Israel’ debacle. Dershowitz listed the ideas that had to be supported for his book, but since the case for Israel is completely untenable, and there was no other support for it, Natalie Portman was reduced to retyping the universally derided Peters book, leading to all the controversy which did so much to destroy the reputation of Dershowitz.


Angry Arab commentator ‘v’ is right on the money:

“No one is saying that Dershowitz did not earn his seat in his field. On the contrary, like most predatory defense attorneys he has sought out the rich to grind his bones to make his bread. However, when he brings the same methodologies into the realm of history and political verities, he is a fish out of water, and makes a fool out of himself.”

Defense lawyers can’t win if they go into a case with the idea that their obviously guilty client is guilty. They have to assume a counterfactual, and work backwards to an acquittal. This only works because of the concept of reasonable doubt. When you attempt to apply the same methods to the real world outside the courtroom, you end up with a disaster like Dershowitz.


posted at 3:59 AM permanent link Comments (134) | Trackback
Sunday, December 09, 2007
Across the River to Motor City

Speaking of the assassination, there’s a new six-part (of which three have aired) Canadian television series called ‘Across the River to Motor City’ which is based on fictional repercussions from the Kennedy assassination. The place is Windsor, Ontario, and, across the river, Detroit. The time flashes between fairly recently and the months just after the Kennedy assassination.

The story involves an old man who is losing his faculties and moves in with his semi-estranged daughter. Forty-some years earlier, on the day of the Kennedy assassination, his girlfriend/almost-fiancee, a Detroit airline stewardess, was returning from a flight from Dallas. Then she disappeared along with one of the pilots, the other pilot committed ‘suicide’, and a woman who was supposed to be the other stewardess on the flight (but was replaced at the last moment) was run down in a car ‘accident’. We see that it is the mob who killed them, and did so on behalf of the only person on the flight in the first-class section, a young Cuban (a further twist is that the young Cuban appears to have become an old Cuban ambassador, who is about to enter into business with the semi-estranged daughter!). The old man was an insurance investigator, and he set out, along with his assistant, a black woman from Windsor (there is a lot of typical Canadian fun at the expense of American racism), and his friend, a stand-up comedian, to unravel the mystery. As his business partner was involved in a racist mob-run fire-insurance scheme, he starts to unravel the mob connections. The story is told as flash-backs by the old man, as the issue has come back to life with the discovery of the bodies of one of the pilots and his girlfriend in the river, and the police are treating him as a suspect. It will be interesting to see how they explain the Kennedy assassination, as the mysterious Cuban must have had a lot to do with it.

I should write about the much more famous and lauded Canadian conspiracy-themed series, ‘Intelligence’, which about to be made as a pilot for American television (by Fox!), the reception of which will be a good test of how open Americans are to a very cynical view of intelligence and police agencies.


posted at 2:04 AM permanent link Comments (184) | Trackback
Morley won!

Somewhat miraculously, Morley won (found here, with link to the judgment) his appeal of a lower court sanction of a CIA end-run around a Freedom of Information Act request with respect to the CIA’s records on George Joannides (Morley writes about the case here, good general summary of the case here, and a long Morley article on Joannides and the newer scientific evidence on the assassination here). The Court found that the CIA technically complied with the Freedom of Information Act, but ignored the JFK Act (which was ironically enacted because the FOIA was inadequate to force documents out of the CIA!). The CIA has been attempting to weasel out of its JFK Act disclosure obligations, and, at least temporarily, until the appeal, has been put in its place. The CIA’s intransigence is telling in the light of all the publicity given to the recent voluntary disclosure by the CIA of its ‘family jewels’. When it comes to material of real interest, the CIA is much less generous with information.


The records on Joannides are a live issue as Posada Carriles is still a political problem in the United States. It is likely that Joannides handled both Posada Carriles and Bosch (Joannides’ CIA job was to destabilize Cuba – something the CIA is still at work on – and Posada Carriles was deeply involved in destabilizing Cuba), and the information the CIA is trying to hide is probably still embarrassing. Of course, the records may be doubly embarrassing depending on the involvement of Joannides in the Kennedy assassination.

posted at 1:09 AM permanent link Comments (2) | Trackback
Saturday, December 08, 2007
Proof of the war between the Establishments

The new Zionist meme is that all 16 (!) of the American intelligence agencies that burst the Zionist war bubble by putting an end to all the ‘Iran talk’ are part of an anti-Semitic plot to attack the Jewish people through protecting the enemies of Zionism. Following up on Podhoretz’s ‘darker suspicions’ theory (‘darker’ is the code word to mean that it is actually a theory about anti-Semitism, but I note with amusement that it is not possible to point that out in polite society, and all discussions of Podhoretz claim he was just making the baffling theory that it was an intelligence agency attack on Bush), Gerald Posner is resurrecting his old Zionist propaganda that the CIA had, and is repressing, absolute proof that the Saudis and Pakistanis were behind September 11. It is not a coincidence that this theory is brought up at this time.


There is a lite Zionist theory circling that the leaking of the NIE was a Bush Administration plot to prove how powerful Bush Administration diplomacy has been in dissuading the Iranians from their nuclear program. This theory is obvious nonsense, disproved immediately by the disarray of Bush Administration officials in dealing with it (Cheney was completely surprised at the release of the NIE, although, of course, he was aware of its content, and had lied about Iran throughout), the complete shock from Israel (this story about Gates and Barak looks like Zionist mythologizing in order to minimize the rift, proven by the fact that Israel in fact was not ready for the NIE release) and the agents of World Jewry (who would have been informed if it was a Bush Administration move), the lack of foreknowledge in the American media (Blitzer’s Zionist operatives at CNN had to do a last-minute cancellation of their smear-job on Iran), and the utter horror and sputtering from the neocons (note Ledeen in particular: no women were involved in the NIE!). Even more conclusive proof is that the NIE not only destroyed the prospect of war on Iran, it completely undermined the entire stated basis of the Bush Administration for the placing of American missile sites in Eastern Europe.

I don’t buy the ‘scientific’ anti-Semitic theories that much of world history consists of a surreptitious war of the Jews against the Gentiles. However, there is simply too much evidence to ignore that current American politics does actually involve a war between the Jewish Establishment and the Old American Establishment (note that doctrinaire Noamian lite Zionism holds that no such war is possible, as the Old American Establishment runs everything). Annapolis was the last straw (can’t you just hear James Baker saying ‘Fucking Jews’?!). The NIE, which only weeks before was never going to be released, according to Mike McConnell, suddenly appears, and at a time when a coherent Zionist counterattack was difficult because of the Jewish Holidays (candle lighting interfered with propaganda!). Since everything is supposed to be about control of oil, which is achieved, according to lite Zionism, by attacks just like the one on Iraq, isn’t it odd that the intelligence agencies (all 16 of them!) of the American Establishment decided to throw a wrench in the works of such a war?

posted at 5:22 AM permanent link Comments (125) | Trackback
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Naqniq, R. I. P.

Naqniq has been suspended by WordPress for the mysterious “violation of our Terms of Service”. Since all it did was accumulate material from other sources, almost entirely ‘mainstream’, and allow the cumulative effect of the facts to damn Zionism and its apologists, the only conceivable problem, besides some inflammatory titles, is that it was becoming too successful in its mission. It would be nice if some WordPress bloggers decided to ‘suspend’ WordPress for this egregious breach of the basic ethos of the internet.

posted at 3:42 AM permanent link Comments (171) | Trackback
Speaking of crooks

Speaking of crooks, the British Labour Party, having very narrowly dodged one scandal involving corruption by the British version of the Jewish Billionaires Club, is not facing a more obvious scandal of influence from the ‘one issue guys’. The baffling propensity of Western political leaders to follow Israeli settler movement policies right down the line can only be explained in terms of money. Of course, this massive conspiracy is one of the things that cannot be discussed in polite company.

posted at 3:32 AM permanent link Comments (8) | Trackback
They're not all stupid and corrupt
From a letter signed by over eighty American evangelist Christian leaders:

“As evangelical Christians, we believe our faith compels us to speak a word together at this crucial moment.

The Bible clearly teaches that God longs for justice and peace for all people. We believe that the principles about justice taught so powerfully by the Hebrew prophets apply to all nations, including the United States, Israel, and the Palestinians. Therefore we are compelled to work for a fair, negotiated solution for both Israelis and Palestinians. We resolve to work diligently for a secure, enduring peace and a flourishing economy for the democratic State of Israel. We also resolve to work for a viable permanent, democratic Palestinian State with a flourishing economy that offers economic opportunity to all its people. We believe that the way forward is for the Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a fair, two-state solution.”

Of course, you won’t find the names of any of the bought-and-paid-for televangelist crooks on the list of signatories.

posted at 3:27 AM permanent link Comments (17) | Trackback
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
How the mighty have fallen

Remember all the hullabaloo about the Dubai ports deal? Almost without notice, Arabs have now obtained effective control of America’s largest bank, Citigroup (the new investment means that Abu Dhabi Investment Authority can obtain 4.9%, the largest single stake in the bank, and Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal already has 3.9%). This is described as an investment, but is actually a bailout, with the incredibly favorable terms to the investor reflecting the fact that the United States government couldn’t afford to let Citigroup fall into insolvency. It is structured as a semi-loan – with an enormous rate of interest, reflecting the ‘junk bond’ status of the largest American bank – that can be converted into equity at a price fixed at only slightly higher than its recent record low (the structuring of the deal appears to be a marvel of legal mumbo-jumbo engineered to avoid being either a loan or equity, either of which would screw up key financial ratios). We’re not hearing complaints about it as the United States is so weak it can’t afford to turn down a bailout.

The Zionist – oh, I mean Jewish! – aspects are interesting. The deal was arranged by Robert Rubin (amongst many other things co-chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, whose most recent mini-scandal involved Enron), with the messy politics handled by Charles Schumer (who railed against the Dubai ports deal, which seems positively benign in comparison). Citigroup’s ability to participate in the so-called ‘subprime crisis’ through its involvement in financial derivatives is as a result of the resistance to financial deregulation championed by . . . Robert Rubin (and Alan Greenspan), who was rewarded with big bucks by Citigroup itself, and now is earning those bucks by setting up the bailout! Isn’t it wonderful how the Arabs and Jews can live in peace and harmony when huge sums of money are involved?


posted at 5:43 AM permanent link Comments (157) | Trackback
Venezuelan slur

From an article on whether the results of the referendum were ‘good for the Jews’ of Venezuela (more free advice for the Jewish community: casting every possible issue in the world as being either ‘good for the Jews’ or not is not ‘good for the Jews’):

“Last year, Chavez himself indirectly accused the Jews of killing Jesus Christ. Although he didn’t explicitly mention the word ‘Jew,’ his remarks left little doubt among Venezuela’s Jews that their president is an unabashed anti-Semite.”

This example of the slur is an easily provable lie (a lie from the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles no less, famous for the Iranian sumptuary law lie), and a slur which the Venezuelan Jewish community itself rejected.


I’ve been complaining about the absurd over-use of the slur, but I’m beginning to see the bright side. Were it not for the slur, the tendency would be to pull punches and mislead. For example, when you really meant ‘Jewish’, you might write ‘Zionist’, as that sounds a little less harsh. Since you will be slurred anyway whenever you come close to the truth, you might as well state the truth unabashedly. The slurrers are in fact encouraging truthfulness.

posted at 4:05 AM permanent link Comments (8) | Trackback
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Dark suspicions
Norman Podhoretz knows an anti-Semitic conspiracy when he sees one (found via War and Piece):

“But I entertain an even darker suspicion. It is that the intelligence community, which has for some years now been leaking material calculated to undermine George W. Bush, is doing it again. This time the purpose is to head off the possibility that the President may order air strikes on the Iranian nuclear installations. As the intelligence community must know, if he were to do so, it would be as a last resort, only after it had become undeniable that neither negotiations nor sanctions could prevent Iran from getting the bomb, and only after being convinced that it was very close to succeeding. How better, then, to stop Bush in his tracks than by telling him and the world that such pressures have already been effective and that keeping them up could well bring about ‘a halt to Iran’s entire nuclear weapons program’ – especially if the negotiations and sanctions were combined with a goodly dose of appeasement or, in the NIE’s own euphemistic formulation, ‘with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security, prestige, and goals for regional influence in other ways.’”

In other words, the American intelligence community has collectively conspired to allow Iran to have nuclear bombs, obviously with the long-term goal of annihilating all the Jews in Israel. Remember that this loon is the guy who is giving Rudy advice on American foreign policy!

posted at 11:43 AM permanent link Comments (185) | Trackback
Ideology and Biblical archaeology
Wonderful piece by Eric Walberg on the misuse of Biblical archaeology (my emphasis throughout in red):

“. . . it is now clear to the most respected Christian, Jewish, Muslim and/or secular archaeologists that this supposedly scholarly, rigorous and objective discipline, with its methodology of taking biblical passages and digging and poking away in likely places, looking for proof of what they say, has been a big failure, if not a hoax. While the financial benefits of tying the Bible to archaeology have increased, historical and intellectual benefits have just as rapidly diminished.

Two egregious flaws lie behind this. Firstly, it is somehow overlooked that both the Old and New Testaments were first written down only in the fourth c BC (mostly from the third c BC) to the first c AD by Hellenised Jews, i.e., over a relatively short historical period of approximately four centuries, the culmination of Hellenism as it flourished in the Middle East up to and including its manifestation under the Roman empire. The references to ‘old Israel’ of the distant past are directed at the enlightenment of people living at that time, and have much more to do with events at that time than some distant, mythical history which was never recorded in stone, so to speak, but was rather passed down from generation to generation much like other peoples have passed down the legends of their origins – orally, embellished by talented composers and poets. Furthermore, the OT and NT are closely integrated in structure, themes, and underlying philosophy, and to reject one part as heretical (as the Jews do the NT) or another part as a mere harmless introduction to the real text (as do the Christians concerning the OT) is not only unprofessional, but foolish and even subversive.

Secondly, the worldview of those recording the Biblical legends, stories, poems, philosophical essays, etc differs radically from ours. It was a product of Hellenism, where true reality is a Platonic ideal, recognising the ineffable quality of life, our overwhelming ignorance, and the fractured, shadowy nature of daily life as experienced by our senses. Our Aristotelian, materialist outlook, sees reality in hard, cold facts which we directly perceive and duly record, where the only truths are what can be physically demonstrated and/or refuted. This is quite alien to the mindset of the Biblical composers, writers and scribes. Taking the Bible literally, as a materialist recounting of ‘history’ is a classic example of misplaced concreteness. To its credit, there is no word for history in ancient Hebrew, reflecting its origins in the pre-Aristotelian worldview.

To go a step further and assume that this bogus history is the ‘real’ history of mankind, with the history of the thousands of other peoples taking a back seat, is just not on. The reality of the Bible is transcendent, universal, traditional, intuitive and emotional. To profit from it, we must rediscover this worldview, where myth is the ‘reality’ and very essence of our lives, and the dunya is a lame, pale version of the sacred myths guiding us. Karen Armstrong, who has written widely on the monotheisms and the loss of myth as a vital part of our worldview, argues in The Bible: a biography (2007) that fundamentalist religion, be it Islamic, Christian or Jewish, is a response to and product of modern materialist culture, which undermines the role of myth as a vital element in the social matrix. Myth is reduced to its literal meaning, i.e., Jerusalem is a physical location at a fixed point in time, not a metaphor for the City of God, transcending the limitations of the physical world.”

and:

“Never was there an ethnically coherent Israel, and according to Thomson, neither Jerusalem nor Judah ever shared an identity with Israel before the rule of the Hasmoneans in the Hellenistic period of the 3rd-1st cc BC, coincidentally, when the legends were first written down. Ironically, the Samaritans, scorned by Ezra's (and today's) Jews, are the most likely Semitic ancestors of the historical Israel.”

and (“colonising a metaphor”!):

“It is impossible in the confines of an article to trace the transformation of post-Christian Talmudic Judaism, which is very different than pre-Christian variant. Though Jews continued to live in Palestine, Diaspora became its defining feature along with the ritual prayer to ‘return’, though post-Christian Jews have no more right to immigrate and live there than anyone else. Christians also continued to live there happily until the Catholic pope decided they must be liberated in the 10th-12th cc and raised a European army to invade Palestine not once but four times. But after that fiasco, Christians learned their lesson and have left Palestine in relative peace, satisfying their spiritual urges by living quietly as monks in desolate caves, making pilgrimages, and collecting souvenir bones and bits of wood which they cherished as holy relics – again guilty of misplaced concreteness, but usually harmlessly so. This blessed peaceful period in Palestine only changed with the ascendancy of the Jews in the 19th c, who all this time had been nurturing their tribal Yahweh and their dream of concretising the metaphorical promises he supposedly made millennia ago, a misplaced concreteness far from harmless, as they set about invading and colonising a metaphor.

With the eclipse of the Socratic worldview and of myth as central to society, and the ascendancy of Judaism after the reformation, the myth of ‘returning to the promised land’ took on a new concrete meaning. The actual prospect by a wealthy cosmopolitican Jewish elite of engineering a physical takeover of Palestine and populating it with Jews became an Aristotelian reality. Today, with Rome (the Catholic Church) now in disarray, a rebuilt Third Temple could become the chief shrine, not only for Jews but for Christians too, the icing on the Zionist victory cake, confirming irrevocably the cultural shift in the Western world as a whole from Hellenism to Hebraism, as argued by SGF Brandon in The Fall of Jerusalem and the Christian Church (1951). Pope John Paul II reconciled the Church with Judaism and Israel, and Christian Zionists welcome the Jewish colonisation of Palestine .

The Zionists reconvened the ancient Jewish supreme court, the Sanhedrin (which condemned Jesus), in 2005 for the first time since 425 AD, and have been plotting virtually since the creation of Israel to blow up the Al-Aqsa Mosque and rebuild a replica of Solomon's temple there. Just recently, Israeli archaeologists ‘found’ remains of a temple under the mosque, yet another astounding victory for this bogus science. Reconstruction plans are in place for the mythical and no doubt magnificent temple of Solomon, a temple that never existed except in the imaginations of dreamy-eyed Jewish scribes in third c BC Alexandria. Truly a breathtaking prospect, however mad. But nonetheless the logical culmination of the Zionist project, eagerly fuelled by the official Israeli archaeological establishment.”

and (!):

“Then there's the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which sets out just such a programme in albeit an overtly grotesque form and is solemnly disowned by Zionists as a forgery, though a forgery of what is never made clear.”

I’ve been thinking about the Protocols, universally described as a Tzarist forgery. This is based on the fact that they are described in a previous French novel, from which the Tzarist agents are said to have stolen the idea. But what if the French novel was just repeating an earlier, accurate, source? More Walberg (who reminds me of a very subtle ‘scientific’ anti-Semite, which is not to say that he is in the least bit wrong):

“What is behind the Bible is not simply a record of historical facts or of even doctrines, but ultimately, the presence of God. There is much self-reference of symbols within the Bible for which the only ‘proof’ that, say, the gospel story is true is that it fulfils the prophecies of the OT, and the only ‘proof’ that the prophecies of the OT are true is that they are fulfilled by the gospel. This has absolutely nothing to do with digging up shards to establish some self-referential ‘event’ in one of the Bible's many tales. There is no temple out there (or under there, where ‘there’ happens to be the very real Al-Aqsa Mosque). The real temple exists in one's heart, though it is very unlikely that one can find it in the scheming Zionist's inflamed and secular heart. And by murdering and tormenting peaceful natives in order to scrounge some bits of a previous building and call it God's temple is unspeakable in its evil. The Naturei Karta heart has the temple in it, but for such a Jew, physical Israel itself is an abomination, and should be dismantled forthwith, or to borrow a particularly colourful metaphor of recent vintage, wiped off the map.”

If we start to see much more analysis like this, the Jewish Billionaires will have their work cut out.

posted at 5:24 AM permanent link Comments (78) | Trackback
Guess who bought the Pajamas

Professional %¤#&!§-Charles Johnson is leaving Pajamas Media. More interesting is the description of the money men behind Pajamas Media. You’ll never guess. Yes, Jewish Billionaires. It is important for us to keep pounding on the facts of who is always behind the warmongering and Zionism that infects the entire American mediascape. Sadly, the American chattering classes don’t want to know, and will hide behind the slur.


posted at 4:48 AM permanent link Comments (7) | Trackback

Web xymphora.blogspot.com

Links
secrets and lies can be sent to
a gmail address for xymphora
Aangirfan
ADE BLOG
Angry Arab News Service
Another Day in the Empire
AR Online Latest News
Bad Attitudes
Bellaciao
Bleier's Blog
Brad Blog
Call Me Ishmael
Cannonfire
Centre for Research on Globalization
CIA-Drugs Yahoo Groups
Common Dreams
Confessions of a Malamute
Copenhagen Interpretation
Cosmic Iguana
CounterPunch
Covert History
cryptogon
Cryptome
Cursor
DesertPeace
Dr.M's Analysis
Follow Me Here
Free Iraq
Gorilla in the Room
Hidden Mysteries headlines
How This Old Brit Sees It
Huff's Crime Blog
Information Clearing House
Informed Comment
Investigating New Imperialism
J. Orlin Grabbe
Jews sans frontieres
Just World News
Lawrence of Cyberia
Left I on the News
Lenin's Tomb
Libertythink
Looking Glass News
Mack White
Mondoweiss
MuzzleWatch
Naqniq
Newsmakingnews
Palestine Blogs
Past Peak
Peace By Truth
Plep
Political-Research Yahoo Groups
Postman Patel
Professor Hex
rabble.ca
Random-Abstract
Raw Story
Rense
Rigorous Intuition
Rigorous Intuition (V. 2.0)
RINF
Robot Wisdom
Robot Wisdom auxiliary
Rumor Mill News Forum
Savage Justice
Scoop World News
Seeing the Forest
Spontaneous Arising
Spontaneous Arising
Suspect Paki
SyriaComment
The Agonist
The Peoples Voice
The Sideshow
The Truth Seeker
This Modern World
ThomasMc.com
Tikun Olam
to the audient void
Today in Iraq
Trinicenter news
Truth About Iraqis
Undernews
Unknown News
uruknet news
Vive le Canada
Wake Up From Your Slumber | The Truth Will Set You Free
War and Piece
War Report
WatchingAmerica
whatreallyhappened
wood s lot
workingforchange news
worldchanging
wotisitgood4
Xiaodong People
YayaCanada
Yayacanada (blogspot)
Ziopedia.org

Powered by
BlogRolling

Enter your email address below
to subscribe to xymphora!


powered by Bloglet
Search this blog:
» Blogs that link here

ARCHIVES
09/01/2000 - 10/01/200010/01/2000 - 11/01/200011/01/2000 - 12/01/200012/01/2000 - 01/01/200101/01/2001 - 02/01/200102/01/2001 - 03/01/200103/01/2001 - 04/01/200104/01/2001 - 05/01/200105/01/2001 - 06/01/200106/01/2001 - 07/01/200107/01/2001 - 08/01/200108/01/2001 - 09/01/200109/01/2001 - 10/01/200110/01/2001 - 11/01/200111/01/2001 - 12/01/200112/01/2001 - 01/01/200201/01/2002 - 02/01/200202/01/2002 - 03/01/200203/01/2002 - 04/01/200204/01/2002 - 05/01/200205/01/2002 - 06/01/200206/01/2002 - 07/01/200207/01/2002 - 08/01/200208/01/2002 - 09/01/200209/01/2002 - 10/01/200210/01/2002 - 11/01/200211/01/2002 - 12/01/200212/01/2002 - 01/01/200301/01/2003 - 02/01/200302/01/2003 - 03/01/200303/01/2003 - 04/01/200304/01/2003 - 05/01/200305/01/2003 - 06/01/200306/01/2003 - 07/01/200307/01/2003 - 08/01/200308/01/2003 - 09/01/200309/01/2003 - 10/01/200310/01/2003 - 11/01/200311/01/2003 - 12/01/200312/01/2003 - 01/01/200401/01/2004 - 02/01/200402/01/2004 - 03/01/200403/01/2004 - 04/01/200404/01/2004 - 05/01/200405/01/2004 - 06/01/200406/01/2004 - 07/01/200407/01/2004 - 08/01/200408/01/2004 - 09/01/200409/01/2004 - 10/01/200410/01/2004 - 11/01/200411/01/2004 - 12/01/200412/01/2004 - 01/01/200501/01/2005 - 02/01/200502/01/2005 - 03/01/200503/01/2005 - 04/01/200504/01/2005 - 05/01/200505/01/2005 - 06/01/200506/01/2005 - 07/01/200507/01/2005 - 08/01/200508/01/2005 - 09/01/200509/01/2005 - 10/01/200510/01/2005 - 11/01/200511/01/2005 - 12/01/200512/01/2005 - 01/01/200601/01/2006 - 02/01/200602/01/2006 - 03/01/200603/01/2006 - 04/01/200604/01/2006 - 05/01/200605/01/2006 - 06/01/200606/01/2006 - 07/01/200607/01/2006 - 08/01/200608/01/2006 - 09/01/200609/01/2006 - 10/01/200610/01/2006 - 11/01/200611/01/2006 - 12/01/200612/01/2006 - 01/01/200701/01/2007 - 02/01/200702/01/2007 - 03/01/200703/01/2007 - 04/01/200704/01/2007 - 05/01/200705/01/2007 - 06/01/200706/01/2007 - 07/01/200707/01/2007 - 08/01/200708/01/2007 - 09/01/200709/01/2007 - 10/01/200710/01/2007 - 11/01/200711/01/2007 - 12/01/200712/01/2007 - 01/01/2008


http://www.xymphora.blogspot.com/