FWIW, my comments to your post are not with respect to the content of the article you linked/copied, but with respect to your observation that you did not find an existing forum that matched up with your view of where your post fits; psychology.

I did take a very quick, very brief peek at the article you copied. I clicked on the link and read the header information on the web site this connects to just long enough to get some sense of the article's position and or bias. Given this quick assessment, it is my opinion that the forum you chose to post into was one of the three most fitting and most eligible candidates of existing forums available for you to post into, the other two being Politics, and Conspiracy. There is a near-infinite proliferation of issues impacting this world that, upon closer inspection of any one or more, is routinely found tied "at the hips" as the saying goes, with the triumvirate of Religion, Conspiracy and Politics, terms that, while the world at large has become fairly well conditioned to view this particular mutt by way of breaking it apart into several distinct terms that each account for part of the collective's "breeding", if you will - categories, that have been created for mass public consumption but are in fact densely interwined, routinely co-dependent (tri-dependent) inseperable phenoms, and therefore interchangeable terms that speak to a unified phenom, not distinct, separate, unrelated phenoms.

In the event you posted what you posted in an effort to stimulate genuine discussion....debate even, you might consider cross-posting to the other 2 forums that host discussion of the topics, that are in this instance, are interchangeable forums in the context of "psychology" that you preented.