|
Pesticide Testing on Humans: STOP! Pesticide Action Network calls for the EPA to stop testing pesticides on humans. TAKE ACTION! PAN ALERT: Stop Testing Pesticides on Humans
In response to public outcry over testing of pesticides on people, the US Congress is requiring that EPA issue a rule regulating such testing. Unfortunately, EPA's proposed rule fails to protect the health of experimental subjects, ignores concerns regarding conflict of interest and continues to allow pesticide manufacturers to finance, design and conduct tests on humans.
Pesticide Action Network (PAN) joins with the Natural Resource Defense Council; the Center for Health, Environment, and Justice; the Organic Consumers Association; Beyond Pesticides and many other organizations in opposing EPA's proposed human testing rule, which does not meet the standards of the Nuremberg Code of ethical medical behavior, despite specific Congressional instructions to do so.
Additionally, we are asking EPA to instead focus energy and resources on studies that evaluate the levels and health impacts of occupational and non-occupational exposures that are already happening, especially in vulnerable groups, and in or near agricultural communities where pesticides are commonly used.
Read more about human testing: http://panna.org/resources/panups/panup_20051128.dv.html
EPA has opened a public comment period with a December 12th deadline. Please join with PAN to stop EPA's proposed rule that lifts restrictions on intentional dosing of human beings with pesticides by EPA. Thank you!
Take Action! Fill out the letter below by December 12th.
Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):
Mr William Jordan Below is the sample letter:
Subject: OPP-2003-0132: Protections for Subjects in Human Research
Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],
This letter is for the public comment submission to the docket on Protections for Subjects in Human Research, Docket ID OPP-2003-0132.
I am concerned that the proposed rule allows intentional dosing of pesticides on human beings. Even small intentional doses of pesticides on human beings are unethical and unacceptable to me. I request that you revise the rule to unambiguously and completely disallow data from unethical studies involving intentional dosing of human beings with pesticides. Instead, please focus EPA resources on studies that evaluate the levels and health impacts of occupational and non-occupational exposures that are already happening, especially in or near agricultural communities where the threat of exposure to pesticides is the greatest. Clear rules on human testing will protect the health of experimental subjects and support the integrity of EPA science. Sincerely,
Your Name If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Pesticide Action Network North America:
Related Blogs:
Pesticide Tests: Kids
Congress mandated that all chemical testing on pregnant women and children be banned. The EPA has created rules that may exempt orphans, handicapped children, neglected or abused children, and children overseas from this ban! TAKE ACTION! Pesticides: Body Burden
The CDC found that more than 90% of U.S. residents carry pesticides in their bodies, many linked to health effects. One recommendation for consumers is to eat organic food and maintain pesticide-free homes. Pesticides: A Mother's View Pesticides: A Personal Letter Pesticides Cause Parkinson's Disease Pesticides: Glowing Photos Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this pageEmail this page  Alert Webmaster
|
CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com
Contact Us - Advertise - Stats
0.031 sec, (2)