|
cllmax Science
Orgasm Science...
The Female Orgasm...
My point of view...
Date: 5/17/2005 2:09:07 PM ( 19 y ) ... viewed 2009 times 
Image from the web site of Judy Levy
and her fabulous Love Boutique:
http://www.pleasurefaire.com/
I am going to write more about this
subject
in my book on
The Seven Love Cures,
Words men need to know
and women want to hear.
Basically, in my sense,
The female cllmax was
created for two reasons...
1. lift-off. It takes a woman
out of the fragmented world we
live in into the potential of full being.
As the author says here, it is for
"Fun."
I would add, it is also for
"Enlightenment."
2. The purpose of the female
cllmax is to get both women and men
"into Trouble." i.e, the Essene Model...
We come into the physical world
to get stuck, and then rise up into
higher ways of seeing and living.
The Essene definition of Wisdom
is the application of knowledge applied
to experience.
Relationship is the greatest
of teachers that I know.
It is so powerful --the sensation of cllmax--
for women as well as men--
that we are asked to deal with all that
goes with being safe in relationship
so we can sustain intimacy.
This means dealling with our own stuff--
our own personal growth material.
The Seven Love Cures are essential
for getting through conscious relationship:
http://www.lesliegoldman.com/Worlds_Greatest_Lovers/id74.htm
http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2005/05/17/more-on-cllmax-science/
May 17, 2005
A Critic Takes On the Logic of Female cllmax
By DINITIA SMITH
New York Times
Evolutionary scientists have never had difficulty explaining the male cllmax, closely tied as it is to reproduction.
But the Darwinian logic behind the female cllmax has remained elusive. Women can have sexua| intercourse and even become pregnant - doing their part for the perpetuation of the species - without experiencing cllmax. So what is its evolutionary purpose?
Over the last four decades, scientists have come up with a variety of theories, arguing, for example, that cllmax encourages women to have sex and, therefore, reproduce or that it leads women to favor stronger and healthier men, maximizing their offspring's chances of survival.
But in a new book, Dr. Elisabeth A. Lloyd, a philosopher of science and professor of biology at Indiana University, takes on 20 leading theories and finds them wanting. The female cllmax, she argues in the book, "The Case of the Female cllmax: Bias in the Science of Evolution," has no evolutionary function at all.
Rather, Dr. Lloyd says the most convincing theory is one put forward in 1979 by Dr. Donald Symons, an anthropologist.
That theory holds that female cllmaxs are simply artifacts - a byproduct of the parallel development of male and female embryos in the first eight or nine weeks of life.
In that early period, the nerve and tissue pathways are laid down for various reflexes, including the cllmax, Dr. Lloyd said. As development progresses, male hormones saturate the embryo, and sexuality is defined.
In boys, the penis develops, along with the potential to have cllmaxs and ejaculate, while "females get the nerve pathways for cllmax by initially having the same body plan."
Nipples in men are similarly vestigial, Dr. Lloyd pointed out.
While nipples in woman serve a purpose, male nipples appear to be simply left over from the initial stage of embryonic development.
The female cllmax, she said, "is for fun."
Dr. Lloyd said scientists had insisted on finding an evolutionary function for female cllmax in humans either because they were invested in believing that women's sexuality must exactly parallel that of men or because they were convinced that all traits had to be "adaptations," that is, serve an evolutionary function.
Theories of female cllmax are significant, she added, because "men's expectations about women's normal sexuality, about how women should perform, are built around these notions."
"And men are the ones who reflect back immediately to the woman whether or not she is adequate sexually," Dr. Lloyd continued.
Central to her thesis is the fact that women do not routinely have cllmaxs during sexua| intercourse.
She analyzed 32 studies, conducted over 74 years, of the frequency of female cllmax during intercourse.
When intercourse was "unassisted," that is not accompanied by stimulation of the clitoris, just a quarter of the women studied experienced cllmaxs often or very often during intercourse, she found.
Five to 10 percent never had cllmaxs. Yet many of the women became pregnant.
Dr. Lloyd's figures are lower than those of Dr. Alfred A. Kinsey, who in his 1953 book "Sexual Behavior in the Human Female" found that 39 to 47 percent of women reported that they always, or almost always, had cllmax during intercourse.
But Kinsey, Dr. Lloyd said, included cllmaxs assisted by clitoral stimulation.
Dr. Lloyd said there was no doubt in her mind that the clitoris was an evolutionary adaptation, selected to create excitement, leading to sexua| intercourse and then reproduction.
But, "without a link to fertility or reproduction," Dr. Lloyd said, "cllmax cannot be an adaptation."
Not everyone agrees. For example, Dr. John Alcock, a professor of biology at Arizona State University, criticized an earlier version of Dr. Lloyd's thesis, discussed in in a 1987 article by Stephen Jay Gould in the magazine Natural History.
In a phone interview, Dr. Alcock said that he had not read her new book, but that he still maintained the hypothesis that the fact that "cllmax doesn't occur every time a woman has intercourse is not evidence that it's not adaptive."
"I'm flabbergasted by the notion that cllmax has to happen every time to be adaptive," he added.
Dr. Alcock theorized that a woman might use cllmax "as an unconscious way to evaluate the quality of the male," his genetic fitness and, thus, how suitable he would be as a father for her offspring.
"Under those circumstances, you wouldn't expect her to have it every time," Dr. Alcock said.
Among the theories that Dr. Lloyd addresses in her book is one proposed in 1993, by Dr. R. Robin Baker and Dr. Mark A. Bellis, at Manchester University in England. In two papers published in the journal Animal Behaviour, they argued that female cllmax was a way of manipulating the retention of sperm by creating suction in the uterus. When a woman has an cllmax from one minute before the man ejaculates to 45 minutes after, she retains more sperm, they said.
Furthermore, they asserted, when a woman has intercourse with a man other than her regular sexua| partner, she is more likely to have an cllmax in that prime time span and thus retain more sperm, presumably making conception more likely. They postulated that women seek other partners in an effort to obtain better genes for their offspring.
Dr. Lloyd said the Baker-Bellis argument was "fatally flawed because their sample size is too small."
"In one table," she said, "73 percent of the data is based on the experience of one person."
In an e-mail message recently, Dr. Baker wrote that his and Dr. Bellis's manuscript had "received intense peer review appraisal" before publication. Statisticians were among the reviewers, he said, and they noted that some sample sizes were small, "but considered that none of these were fatal to our paper."
Dr. Lloyd said that studies called into question the logic of such theories. Research by Dr. Ludwig Wildt and his colleagues at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany in 1998, for example, found that in a healthy woman the uterus undergoes peristaltic contractions throughout the day in the absence of sexua| intercourse or cllmax. This casts doubt, Dr. Lloyd argues, on the idea that the contractions of cllmax somehow affect sperm retention.
Another hypothesis, proposed in 1995 by Dr. Randy Thornhill, a professor of biology at the University of New Mexico and two colleagues, held that women were more likely to have cllmaxs during intercourse with men with symmetrical physical features. On the basis of earlier studies of physical attraction, Dr. Thornhill argued that symmetry might be an indicator of genetic fitness.
Dr. Lloyd, however, said those conclusions were not viable because "they only cover a minority of women, 45 percent, who say they sometimes do, and sometimes don't, have cllmax during intercourse."
"It excludes women on either end of the spectrum," she said. "The 25 percent who say they almost always have cllmax in intercourse and the 30 percent who say they rarely or never do. And that last 30 percent includes the 10 percent who say they never have cllmax under any circumstances."
In a phone interview, Dr. Thornhill said that he had not read Dr. Lloyd's book but the fact that not all women have cllmaxs during intercourse supports his theory.
"There will be patterns in cllmax with preferred and not preferred men," he said.
Dr. Lloyd also criticized work by Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, an emeritus professor of anthropology at the University of California, Davis, who studies primate behavior and female reproductive strategies.
Scientists have documented that cllmax occurs in some female primates; for other mammals, whether cllmax occurs remains an open question.
In the 1981 book "The Woman That Never Evolved" and in her other work, Dr. Hrdy argues that cllmax evolved in nonhuman primates as a way for the female to protect her offspring from the depredation of males.
She points out that langur monkeys have a high infant mortality rate, with 30 percent of deaths a result of babies' being killed by males who are not the fathers. Male langurs, she says, will not kill the babies of females they have mated with.
In macaques and chimpanzees, she said, females are conditioned by the pleasurable sensations of clitoral stimulation to keep copulating with multiple partners until they have an cllmax. Thus, males do not know which infants are theirs and which are not and do not attack them.
Dr. Hrdy also argues against the idea that female cllmax is an artifact of the early parallel development of male and female embryos.
"I'm convinced," she said, "that the selection of the clitoris is quite separate from that of the penis in males."
In critiquing Dr. Hrdy's view, Dr. Lloyd disputes the idea that longer periods of sexua| intercourse lead to a higher incidence of cllmax, something that if it is true, may provide an evolutionary rationale for female cllmax.
But Dr. Hrdy said her work did not speak one way or another to the issue of female cllmax in humans. "My hypothesis is silent," she said.
One possibility, Dr. Hrdy said, is that cllmax in women may have been an adaptive trait in our prehuman ancestors.
"But we separated from our common primate ancestors about seven million years ago," she said.
"Perhaps the reason cllmax is so erratic is that it's phasing out," Dr. Hrdy said. "Our descendants on the starships may well wonder what all the fuss was about."
Western culture is suffused with images of women's sexuality, of women in the throes of cllmax during intercourse and seeming to reach heights of pleasure that are rare, if not impossible, for most women in everyday life.
"Accounts of our evolutionary past tell us how the various parts of our body should function," Dr. Lloyd said.
If women, she said, are told that it is "natural" to have cllmaxs every time they have intercourse and that cllmaxs will help make them pregnant, then they feel inadequate or inferior or abnormal when they do not achieve it.
"Getting the evolutionary story straight has potentially very large social and personal consequences for all women," Dr. Lloyd said. "And indirectly for men, as well."
The NYTimes has a review of Lloyd’s book that I wrote about yesterday, including a quote that greater clarifies her position:
Western culture is suffused with images of women’s sexuality, of women in the throes of cllmax during intercourse and seeming to reach heights of pleasure that are rare, if not impossible, for most women in everyday life.
“Accounts of our evolutionary past tell us how the various parts of our body should function,” Dr. Lloyd said.
If women, she said, are told that it is “natural” to have cllmaxs every time they have intercourse and that cllmaxs will help make them pregnant, then they feel inadequate or inferior or abnormal when they do not achieve it.
“Getting the evolutionary story straight has potentially very large social and personal consequences for all women,” Dr. Lloyd said. “And indirectly for men, as well.”
Thoughts?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/17/science/17orga.html?pagewanted=print
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
