*** Here is where you can find the contorted way of a certain religious group as to how they have altered the truth of Yeshua - Jesus!
This alteration is based upon one man's views:
- as opposed to the evidance presented in "The Holy Book" written by over (40) forty different authories spanning over a 2500 year period!
===============================================
Paul Austin Murphy
* Here is what the Islamic belive? *
“If you want to save Christianity from atheism and Islam, [the] Trinity should be made a heresy and false [that] Jesus is Jewish [and a] human prophet of God. If not atheism will take over Christianity and Islam will take over atheism.”
– Syed Iftekharuddin
- In other words, Christians must believe in the Islamic Jesus and reject the Trinity. That is, Christians must become Muslims.
Why didn’t Syed Iftekharudin just say that? Why his hidden dawah and taqiyya?
- The Islamic “Jesus” shares nothing with the Christian Jesus except (sort-of) the name ‘Jesus’, but Muslims even have a problem with that precise name:
‘Jesus’ in the Koran is called “Issa”, which isn’t even the Arabic equivalent to the Hebrew “Yeshu’”{1} (from which is derived the English “Jesus” via the Greek “Iessous”). In Arabic “Yeshu” becomes “Yassu’”.
The “Islamic Jesus” -Issa: * What they profess *
Was simply “a prophet on the way to Muhammad”. (K.2:136, 3:84, 4:163,171; 5:46,75; 19:19; 33:7; 61:6)
He was a Muslim. (Moses, in the Koran, apparently, wasn't a Jew either.) (K.3:46,49,52; 4:172; 6:85; 61:14)
He did not die on the cross but “it was made to seem that way”. (K.4:157)
He prophesied the coming of Muhammad. (K.61:6)
He was married and had children. {2}
He was not the son of God. (K.3:59; 5:17,72,116; 9:30-31; 19:19,88,91-92; 42:13)
He went to Mecca.{3}
He does things in Islamic texts that no Christian texts acknowledge him doing (e.g., “preaching from the cradle”). (K.3:49; 5:110)
** (Note: In the Koran references above traditional Islamic exegesis is used in their assignation. )
*******************************************
The name and deeds of Jesus are just tools which Muslims use – “something we share” – at interfaith meetings (as well as elsewhere) in order to entice gullible Christians into Islam or to hold favorable opinions of Islam … and it often works.
In fact, it started with Muhammad himself who used both the Jewish prophets and texts, as well as Jesus, as a neat and deceitful way to create a connection between his new invention, Islam, and those older faiths.
Muhammad knew he had to have a certain degree of shared ground in order to bring “unbelievers” or kuffar into his new religion. And that’s exactly what Muslims are doing today in interfaith meetings, on the BBC, in Guardian articles, etc.
You will find that once gullible Christians convert (or “revert”) to Islam (simply because of the “shared Jesus”), Muslims will rarely talk about him. He will then become just another prophet who’s only talked about on religious programmers on the BBC or at interfaith meetings. Muslims, among st themselves, rarely talk about Jesus – if at all.
The problem with the Trinity that Muslims have is ridiculous. Although I don’t fully understand the Trinity, the idea of one thing (of any kind) having three distinct aspects is not in the least bit self-contradictory.
So why do Muslims often write, “1+1+1=1″ in order to denigrate Christians? So much for interfaith!
==================================================
- Think of the British Government/state which is divided into three: executive, judiciary and legislature – “three in one”.
Or how about (at the simplest level) the human body: bone, tissues and blood?
** There are many 3 in one references in existence!
So how does this disprove Jesus of the Bible from the Islamic view?
It does not!
|
|
|
kerminator
|
|
CureZone