CureZone   Log On   Join
Re: Wondering about flushes vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy...
 
  Views: 4,241
Published: 21 y
 
This is a reply to # 449,930

Re: Wondering about flushes vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy...


Everyone has a degree of risk that they're comfortable with.

Ignore normal liver function tests. They test hep, cancer and the like. As far as I know, there is no test for liver congestion due to stones. You can have 3,000 stones in your liver and have a completely normal liver function test. I know that this is true.

Operations cost money and have serious risks. I understand one can also end up with diarrhea for life and have to cart around bile salts like an insulin-dependent diabetic has to cart around insulin. Liver cleanse costs nothing net net. Pay $3.00, skip 1 1/2 meals, it's a wash.

Don't assume the worst with the cleanse just because a few people aren't getting the traction that they hoped for. At least they tried. Many more people succeed. You might want to try Hulda Clark 's cleanse a few times before committing to the expense and risks of an operation.

In the end, do what feels right for you...

Good luck, and let us know how things work out for you either way.

hg
 

 
Printer-friendly version of this page Email this message to a friend
Alert Moderators
Report Spam or bad message  Alert Moderators on This GOOD Message

This Forum message belongs to a larger discussion thread. See the complete thread below. You can reply to this message!


 

Donate to CureZone


CureZone Newsletter is distributed in partnership with https://www.netatlantic.com


Contact Us - Advertise - Stats

Copyright 1999 - 2024  www.curezone.org

0.188 sec, (1)