|
6 years later?
** This is one of a thousand examples of how the rule of law has been abolished in America today, for all intents and purposes. **
Date: 3/2/2015 12:11:41 PM ( 9 y ) ... viewed 8895 times Kermit's Korner Blog -
Recent Posts: http://draft.blogger.com/home.
More truth - US Gov't
MOUNT SINAI - Burned with Fire
glycemic load
America’s anti-American government - part 1
Allah has promised Israel to the Jews
Which is good?
With out Faith...
Speak to your Mountain!
About Volcanoes?
Does H - Generator work?
------------------------------------
Powered by Blogger
Monday, March 02, 2015
"6 years later??"
-------------------------------------
** Before the 2008 election was held, we tried to warn America of what was coming.
If we ignored what the Constitution explicitly said regarding the eligibility of presidential candidates, then the founding documents that held our nation together and set it apart from the rest of the world would be rendered meaningless.
We would no longer be governed by the rule of law, I predicted. We would be governed by the rule of men.
Now, more than six years later, we are saddled with a president who knows no one is going to hold him accountable to the law. After all, if we didn’t take the Constitution seriously on a matter of the few and simple eligibility rules it set forth regarding the presidency, why would the Congress, the courts and the people hold him accountable other laws of the land?
*** The major problem...
The results are in. The evidence is clear. The history has been written.
Barack Obama has abused his authority as president to, in effect, legislate new rules on immigration, after making repeated public comments making clear he knew he had no such power. He even neglected to follow his own executive branch rules in issuing what has been incorrectly termed an “executive order,”
as WND first reported. And now he ignores a federal judge’s ruling on that fine point.
*** This is one of a thousand examples of how the rule of law has been abolished in America today, for all intents and purposes.
It gives me no satisfaction that seeing this coming and pointing it out over and over again over the last six years.
]I would have preferred to be wrong. I would have preferred that Obama respected his oath of office. I would have preferred that he faced real opposition when he didn’t. I would have preferred if America’s system of checks and balances on power worked the way they were intended. I would have preferred that a federal judge or the Congress of the people held Obama accountable to the Constitution back in 2008.
It would have saved America a great deal of pain and suffering.
Even worse, Americans don’t seem to have learned a lesson yet.
*** Experience more of Joseph Farah’s no-nonsense truth-telling in his books, audio and video products, featured in the WND Superstore
They have even less respect for the law today than they had prior to the 2008 election debacle between two candidates with eligibility issues. Only the future loser’s lesser issues were even scrutinized and ruled upon by the U.S. Senate.
In reflecting on all this, it seems like a bad dream.
Does anyone care about the rule of law anymore?
Does anyone care about the Constitution?
Does anything matter?
Is the system hopelessly broken now?
*** From 2008 through 2015, many people told me the eligibility issue was simply not important. Obama, they explained, had to be defeated on his political agenda. To me, flouting the Constitution demonstrated Obama’s political agenda. It exposed it. It revealed it. It demonstrated it. Flouting the Constitution was the agenda.
That’s what I thought then. Today, I am 100% convinced of that fact.
More than six years later, the questions about Obama’s eligibility remain. How could a man whose father was a non-American and a mother too young to confer natural born citizenship on her son be eligible for the presidency?
** Recent information from the British Commonwealth records show BHO was born in Kenya in 1960 - fact!
But no one cares – except late-night comedians. The whole issue has become one big joke.
Sadly, so has the rule of law.
Giving a pass on the constitutional eligibility test in 2009 was like allowing the camel’s nose under the tent. Since then, the camel has entered the tent and done what camels do when allowed inside – wreaked utter havoc.
Media wishing to interview Joseph Farah, please contact media@wnd.com.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/03/6-years-later-why-eligibility-matters/#OlK9d6vqY89LQJaZ.99
Add This Entry To Your CureZone Favorites! Print this page
Email this page
 Alert Webmaster
|
