Jim Humbles FAQ about MMS #1 - Cancer

While Jim Humble is "revising" his web sites in a "knee jerk" reaction to some actions of the FDA, I thought it would be interesting to take a look at his claims for Miracle-Mineral-Supplement .

It is my hope that he will finally include some "substance" to back up his claims, or that he will acknowledge that Miracle-Mineral-Supplement may help in some cases, but it is no "Miracle."

"1. Telling if Miracle-Mineral-Supplement will help the cancer and the MMS cancer protocol."

Oops, there is a problem with the very first paragraph... Jim Humble states "there has been a medical test for cancer that is 99% effective for more than 25 years... snip... It's called AMAS cancer test."

Here is the link to the web site

http://www.oncolabinc.com/


They claim a false positive rate of 5%. How can it be 99% effective with an error rate of 5%?

Here is an interesting discussion on this test.

http://www.pathguy.com/malignin.htm


I am not aware of anyone having this test done, so I can't comment on its results. Does anyone have any experience with this test?

Jim Humble states that you can know if MMS is going to work with cancer if you can pass the point of nausea and press on increasing the number of drops. He goes on to state that "the idea" is that MMS is killing off the cancer and the nausea is caused by the die off.

It is my understanding that if the goal is to kill off cells, there must be care because this kill off often involves swelling. In the case of brain cancer, there is little room for swelling. Unfortunately, there is no warning of this from Jim Humble.

When MMS doesn't work, Jim Humble recommends trying Indian Herb or Paradophillus. The reason cited for the failure of MMS to work is that the cancer cells may be reproducing faster than MMS can kill them off. This is probably true.

Jim Humble goes on to suggest that you can use the AMAS test to see if progress is made. It is always responsible to monitor progress through testing, but it is important to make sure the tests are capable of producing the information needed to determine your progress.

Jim Humble ends this question by stating the MMS protocol. He does not recognize that different strength acid produce different amounts of chlorine dioxide upon activation. He does not recognize that when a high concentration of ClO2 is produced, more dilution is required. However, if the solution is too strong, simply mix some juice with it to use up some of the ClO2, and then it won't be too strong.

Jim Humble claims that his doses have 1-2 PPM ClO2 in them. Every time I mix a solution and dilute it down to 1-2 PPM ClO2, I find that no juice is necessary to mask the taste. The solution is basically colorless, has a very slight odor, and very slight to no taste.

I have found that dogs will not hesitate to drink solutions with ClO2 concentrations of 1 - 2 PPM, but when the concentration is increased to 5 - 6 PPM ClO2, they shy away from it. The concentration in the normal 15 drop dose prepared according to the MMS protocol has been tested and found to be just under 100 PPM free chlorine dioxide.

Tom