Re: Question re zapper models!

Due to time constraints, I am not taking time to respond to all of your claims but will respond to the following:

>- sure this is not music to your ears.

Actually, it is irrelevant. I am not competing, only doubting your claims.

>>- #1 - the square wave contains only odd integer harmonics.

>- ** Not according to Dr. Lloyd.

Then Dr. Lloyd is lacking in knowlege of square waves.

>>- #2 - A true square wave has a 50% duty cycle - equal high and low periods.

>- ** Not true. An INFERIOR true wave has a 50% duty cycle

Wrong again, A true square wave has 50 percent duty cycle and only odd harmonics. Anything else is a rectangular wave.

>>- Your zapper does not produce a true square wave

>- ** This ranks as the grossest of all the inaccuracies you have printed on this site about The Ultimate Zapper. It shows to what lengths you will go to lie about my zapper. People can see that this is a bald-faced lie by viewing the true square wave in the oscilloscope pictures on the front page of my site at

Your output is a rectangular wave. A true square wave has equal sides, exactly 50 percent duty cycle. Read any electronics text book.

>>- and a square wave does not provide even harmonics.

>- ** You should talk to Dr. Lloyd about this. He would certainly disagree with you.

Dr. Lloyd is welcome to call and talk at any time on my dime. The fact is that a true square wave by definition only produces odd harmonics. Again, read the text books.

>- ** The more you try to discredit my zapper the more you paint yourself into a corner because

There is no effort to discredit your zapper, only your unsubstantiated claims.

What you have offered is not proof and would not stand up to legal scrutiny. Heck, you are not even willing to have a 3rd party comparison preformed.