Even though it may well be, that Aloe has significant impacts on various illnesses, even bacteria - one should be very careful adding viruses to this group. For HIV it has near to none impact, for example; other than olive-leaf-extract, which has shown in vitro significant drops in hiv-counts. But here as well one must consider all the good benefits aloe has on the various deseases that come along with HIV plus the stabilizing effects on the immunesystem in general. So why not combine it with the regular HAART therapy, maybe some olive-leaf-extract and one gets a good mixture of helpful me ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

Couldn’t a reaction as this simply be, cause you may be allergic against this protein-molecule? Cause, this is actually what aspartame is, isn’t it? Allgergies are usually targeted against some sort of protein. I drink aspartame drinks for years, my friend does and none of us has pains of any sort so far. If this is true and it’s an allergy, then one cannot say in general, that small amounts of aspartame are dangerous or poisening. Certain wheat, nuts etc. are considered to be allergy-reasons, sugar makes you sick, but vegan food makes you ill, too; due to a lack of many important prot ...
[retrieve this message]

---

My goodness. Haven’t heard so much bu.....t in a long time. Talking about religion. Any common sense and reality can tell, this is just a bunch of false statements and results.   [End]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

Wow, I like that information about your fat percentage. That’s some seriously good news and information! Keep on watching that... Here’s my advise to IL II. Some studies do 2 mio/ml a day for like 4 weeks, some studies go to 5 mio/ml a day for 5 days. Others even higher. Due to those studies the following basics: with 2 mio a day for a long time its easier to do, cause less side effects. Yet the impact on cd4 is far less significant and it seems the virus does not completely open up to the medicine, therefore die. Still, its worth some thoughts to do that once for a month or so, cause ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

I perfectly do understand what you’re talking about. Its just in order to give up or put on stake the very or rather excellent condition of my friend needs more proof than theories. This time release theory is yet not that contradictory to what the common knowledge is. The cd4 cells and other immune-cells have each a certain period of time where they survive in order to provide a body for as long as possible with sufficient immunepower. Some for a few days, some divide after a certain desease appears, some after several years. Thats why its so important to have naturally high cd4 counts w ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

It’s always a very very personal decision which way to go. My friend and I are living a perfect ”normal” life now, except for twice a day taking a pill or two. Guess, these pulsers and zappers will make him more a ”borg” from Star Trek than before... ;-) Problem you should consider though, if these high cell counts persist: each new virus cell needs proteine - lots of proteine. If it doesn’t get enough for reproduction it will take it from your muscles - thats why aids patients look like scellotons (wrong spelling, I know) Watch closely those counts and do something about it if it does ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

Thanx for explaining your thoughts and acts. One of the main problems will certainly be the location of that virus and it’s not asleep at any time of day. Ozoned water will not change that. If only electrifying would be the solution by itself one could set patients into a koma and put the entire body under that electification for a while, and everybody would be cured - a little like this heat therapy, which kills off quite a lot, yet obviously not enough. I think it would work in conjunction with HAART therapy though. Interleukin II was tested early 80s as well and failed, cause there was ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

interesting, now that one claims he’s been using a zapper religously twice a day yet the virus-loads are rising there are all kinds of arguments why this isn’t enough anymore. It sounded all so promising before, those protocols etc. claiming that zapping would even eliminate infected cells or at least deactivate the virus for further reproduction. The virus is tough indeed. It can hide in some cells not only for months but a lot of years. It’s possible even longer than 10 years. My best friend got below detection 8 years ago with a three medicine HAART therapy and since he had started ea ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

Wow, great information about your treatment and the results. Thanks! Now one question I go: Do you use the MiniZap which electrifies or a Clark zapper (frequencies)? My best friend is hiv positive, yet for 8 years under regular HAART treatment below detection. Plus after doing Interleukin II therapy 4 times he didn’t even have those hidden viruses in the CD4 cells in 1 Mio cells, none. He is doing fine, yet we want to do more in order to get rid of the viruses completely, dispite what anybody may say. Due to IL II his cd4 count is above 1000 and since he was never below 600 from the sta ...
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve this message]
[retrieve the message]

---

Thanx, interesting links, indeed. Yet, under the topic ”Weight lifting, Beck protocol...” he then declares the details of his weightlifting etc., plus that he’s doing the ”Clark” protocol???!!! And in the text he says, this so called cleaning hasn’t done anything noticable for him but he proceeds with it. Now what? Beck as the title suggested or Clark as in the text? Result or not? Still interesting forums and information, one can see and decide for himself what seems reasonable enough.   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

thanx for the links! A friend of mine to whom I mentioned this Cr.Clark report told me, that he too had used Dr.Clarks zapper and he had not noticed any significant changes in his health status whatsoever, except for his nerves having spent a lot of money for it. With the MiniZap which works apparently by electifying the blood instead of just working with frequences as with Dr.Clarks he experienced good results, even a chronic bladder-infection was being cured within a few days. He is content with it and now uses it along with a magnetic pulser two times a week to prevent illness and fe ...
[retrieve this message]

---

In another forum someone mailed me this following link to a critical article about Dr.Clark, her protocols, her zapper etc. Apparently with all that franchise around her and her business along with missing proof she is misleading patients. Although Dr.Beck also refers to bacteria as the cause of many deseases his protocol is quite different, and it seems the MiniZap is a different machine too - plus cheaper. Here is the link: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Cancer/clark.html Has anybody thoughts or suggestions about this?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

I tried the pulser today. I am used to Hulda Clarck’s zapper - which I will not stop using - so the pulser seems a little odd on one arm. I am sure I will get used to it. I did feel the current, no need to look for the yellow light. Question: How long did you use it at the begining? Thank you, Ana   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

Has anyone experience using both instruments in order to support the immune-system and kill viruses and bacterias? Both claim to deactivate viruses like retroviruses (herpes, hiv) in cells. For both it’s said, they block enzymes promoting cancer. Does this double the effect? Any former ill people here who got cured? Information where to find those proofs here in the net? Or is it better not to use both? I understand not to take them at precisely the same time, but how about the same day?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---

”Iwould just use the Beck Protocol by it self. Then wait and see if your health improves. If it does, continue. If it not, try another treatment. Otherwise you won’t know for sure what is working. Also the doctor will claim the drug cocktail is a success screwing up the statistics.” Well, I do admit I disagree on this. The treatment for my best friend has been very successful, since for more than 8 years he is below detectable measurements and doing just fine. Plus after an Interleukin II treatment he even didn’t have so called hidden viruses in 1 mio cells, which is quite good. Yet, i ...
[retrieve this message]

---

Can one use either or both devices while at the same time having HAART treatment (combination therapy)? Some claim not using the MiniZap blood electrifier with garlic or certain medicines or provitiamin a. What about HIV treatment?   [End]
[retrieve this message]

---