Date:   9/1/2007 10:38:42 AM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   6,177
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=954681

What weather problems?

Maybe the axis is merely shifting as part of it's own cycle?

As for 2012, that is said to be the time when the current Mayan calander culimates it's present cycle. Coincidentally, 2012 is also said to be the year of the culmination of a different cycle all together: Pole Shift. The Mayan calander is based upon a cycle that requires approximately 394 years to complete one revolution through. CAVEAT: "year" being based on the present political system known as Julian for which we have been conditioned by traditions of the past centuries to measure such.

As for the period between pole shifts, as you can imagine, when there are various competing groups of world experts involved, and the bank-rollers such ride on, universal agreement tends to be difficult to settle upon. Maybe THAT is what the only real, genuine problem for concern lies in this context. Be this as it may, the period for one Pole Shift is roughly bounded by a cycle of upwards to 25,000 years. Coincidentally, that figure - 25,000 years, is pretty close to the period of another cycle all tother; the precession (IE> backwards procession) for the equanox of the 12 Zodiacs (12 Ages). Guess what? That's right, due to disagreement among global experts, we - the world, are either still in the waning years of the Age of Pisces OR have alread entered into the Aquarian Age.

If there is any genuine problem of concern here, it seems to be that competing groups of scientists and those who bankroll them have been unable to universally convince their respective fan bases of what, exatcly, should be taken as "normal" for the characteristic aspects that will occur during periods or cycles in the existance of our universe. For myself personally, before I will be inclined to put any faith what any of these experts are wanting to claim, they should first put forth some credible evidence that portrays examples of what the nature of events were (volcanic, weather, weather-related, axis shifting, etc) that took place the last time a pole shift occured nearly 25,000 years ago. For whatever reason, these experts collectively seem to be somewhere between unwilling & incapable of doing that. As such, for all I know, whatever trends one may wish to focus on - recent & short term weather events or whatever, may be doing what they are supposed to do if/when viewed over the longer, more realistic view. The practicality of reason in this context tends to cut in on and interfere with the action of the aforementioned groups, scientists et. al. Who's to say? This is just another dicey subject from a sea of such, but those types tend to frequently espouse agendas for wanting to convince us all that we should only be concerned with their shorter-term view of our world.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=954681