Re: Bush To Veto Ban On Mercury In Vaccines by boldyloxx ..... News Forum
Date: 7/21/2007 12:43:25 PM ( 17 y ago)
Hits: 1,389
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=923512
This sickens me. There is no ethical reason Bush has as an excuse to veto this ban. There are other safer preservatives pharmaceutical companies can use besides mercury laden thimerasol-- but they prefer to use thimerasol because it is a really cheap preservative in mass quantity vaccines.
Same thing with silver Amalgam fillings loaded with 50% mercury . They are cheaper than composite or porcelain fillings- for mass quantities of people.
Cheaper is not always better. In this case, it is dangerous.
Apparantly,-- (and does this surprise any of us?) our elected officials have no SINCERE regard for public health. Their only regard is for the corporations and lobbyists who $-pad-$ thier political party.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.05 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=923512