I didn't think I would have to save some of that pie for you. Once again you ignore what ML is actually saying and creatively interpret it to match with what you know to be true. I still haven't figured out why for someone who appears so knowledgeable, you continue to support him in his imaginary ventures into pseudoscience.
Nothing in any of the links even hints to energy from alkaline/acids being converted into "electro-magnetic" energy and then being converted into matter.
What you have is energy being used to break and create bonds, do work, activate enzymes.
"Photosynthesis is not a very efficient process. Of the sunlight reaching the surface of a leaf, approximately:
75% is evaporated
15% is reflected
5% is transmitted through the leaf
4% is converted to heat energy
1% is used in photosynthesis
How do we know the O2 is derived from H2O during photosynthesis?
The oxygen product of photosynthesis could originate from either the CO2 or the H2O starting compounds. To determine which of these original compounds contributed to the O2 end product, an isotopic tracer experiment was performed using 18O:
18O is a heavy isotope of oxygen
H218O + CO2 yields 18O2
H2O+C1802 yields O2
Therefore, the O2 end product must originate from water and not from the carbon dioxide.
How do we know what the first products of photosynthesis are?
Another isotopic tracer experiment:
14C is a radioactive isotope of carbon. 14CO2 is exposed for a brief period to a green plant that is conducting a photosynthesis in the presence of sunlight. Immediately after exposure to 14CO2, the plant's photosynthetic tissue is killed by immersing it in boiling alcohol, and all of the biochemical reactions cease. The chemical compounds in the dead tissue are all extracted and studied to determine which of them possesses the 14C. Following the briefest exposure to 14CO2, the only chemical compound that possessed 14C was PGA (phosphoglyceric acid, a three carbon molecule). Following longer periods of exposure, much of the 14C was found in a variety of compounds including glucose. By varying the length of the exposure period it was possible to identify the sequence of the reactions leading from PGA to glucose.
So, from your own links, matter is not created from "Electron-magnetic Energy" but rather obtained from the available water and atmospheric CO2. The math tells the story, though I hate to add another equatoin and lose some readers but... you could never generate enough energy to create matter. Do your own math, at the equator we get ideally (no clouds, perpendicular) around 20 calories per minute per square meter, that is 84 joules per minute/meter squared.
E= mc2
if m=1 gram
E = (0.001 kilogram)(300 000 000 m/s)(300 000 000 m/s)
E = 9 X 10^13 Joules
So for 1 meters squared at 100% efficiency, to make 1 gram of matter would require 1 THOUSAND BILLION minutes assuming sun shines 24 without any cloud cover.... as we know this is not true.