Re: ~Catholic Church OKs Beastiality-Interspecies Embryos~ by Ohfor07 ..... News Forum
Date: 6/29/2007 12:30:49 PM ( 18 y ago)
Hits: 17,422
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=909146
FWIW, this thread just happened to coincide with a situation ripe for me to go on a bit of a treasure hunt in trying to track down some of the meanings that are becoming increasingly lost for words we may find being used in the present.
Beastiality, and Catholic Church, are a couple of words/terms in particular that make for a good treasure-hunting study when they are found having been used in conjunction. In attempting to break down this into further relevant meaning, without naming any specific names
thanks to the phenom of people staring into a special box to be entertained & dazzled for hours at a time by the nature of the things sparkly that emenate from it, words and their accompanying definitions are becoming among the most ephemeral phenoms that permeate reality - hard to pin down consistently. A basic choice: favoring the use of new speak?, or giving due diligence to traditional meanings / definitions? The image in question just happened upon the example shown, but do not be mislead. The kind of nonesense eligible to come out of said box is vast.
People glued to the tube may easily accept all manner of notions, for instance, that bestiality, DUH!, only means a human having intercourse with an animal lower then them the human. This might work so long as one is good at ignoring the additional slippery / ephemeral terms: humans; lower-grade animals. The same kind of sparkly programming allows people to easily accept all sorts of unspoken notions, such as, the term intercourse - DUH!, nearlyl always implies sexual relations. Other people, Websters among them, are not so hasty in coming to be conditioned to use words with meanings affixed to them by what somebody else has programmed into them. From this perspective, 1) intercourse is the result of connection or dealings between persons or groups, and or 2) an exchange especially of thoughts or feelings, and from this, as just one of countless potential examples to be found in practical application from the sea of humanity, if and or whenever such contact and or connection and or exchange of thoughts / feelings makes use of genitalia, ipso presto POOF!, sexual intercourse is said to occur .... EXCEPTING, of course, and depending upon, exactly, what the government's accepted definition of "is" is, right? Good luck trying to explain the depth of this to the animals of any grade - higher or lower as the case may be, who are content to stare into said box for hours, weeks, and years at a time ad infinitem and thereby render useless their capactity for depth.
What, conceivably, is meant or implied by this term? What is a beast? What are the boundaries of that which is a beast? Where do we have to look for guidance? Among other places, there is the long-popular lore found in an ancient book wherein is made statements such as:
Let be that wisdom that count the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and his number is 666.
He forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark in his right hand or in his forehead , so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or number of his name.
It may not greatly assist the word-treasure-hunting cause that said book in all it's countless revisions has the tendency of regularly attempting to convey meaning via content that often defies clear discernment due to being cloaked in rather cryptic, riddlesome mysteries. Be this as it may, it appears that whatever the boundaries are of this term "beast" from an ancient perspective, the implication is that however it may be people come to have intercourse with a beast, the beast can manifest as a number, as well as a name, such that said number can be or is simultaneously the number of man. In itself this may blur the notion that there are clear lines of distinction between this thing called "beast" and this thing called "higher-grade human animlas". Looking past that, are we to imply that man can have sex with a number? On the one hand, one may have trouble grasping the meaning of such a mysterious concept, but this is at least consistent with the riddlesom nature of meanings to be found in said book. On the other hand, in a cyber sense, do not humans, being the ever-creative animals they are known to be, find no difficulty in imagining ways to use their cyber-space to effectively have sexual intercourse with each other?
History suggest there once was the Beast of Berlin, but again, try to ignore for the moment that it may be difficult to clearly define such as animl beast or human beast.
If pictures are worth any number of words, one may fairly say that picture depicts a form of intercourse between said particular beast and an agent/officer of a well-known church. Case in point seems to depict the image of the person generally understood to be an agent... delegate...officer, or the like, of the highest chief ruler of said church having some form of intercourse with said Beast of Berlin. Here is another image depicting a close-up view of the human generally acknowledged to be the chief of said church during the era EDIT: CORECTION not long after the era of the Beast of Berlin. According to Bill Cooper, said pontiff, at the time of the era of the Beast of Berlin, was merely a door-to-door salesman of Zyklon B employed by one I.G. Farben.
As I understand it, this church in particular as well as most any church church at large, in a general sense, is a specially constructed place where people go to have special kinds of intercourse - contact/connection with other people and or things of people wherein the exchange of thoughts, feelings and the like can well be said to occur. On a good day, one would not normally associate this kind of churchly intercourse as related to a specifc type - sexual but on a bad day, said sparkle box may try to convince you otherwise.
What is up with that funky head dress made out to look as though said church agent is wearing the head of a particular lower animal - the fish, upon his own head? Here is another image that depicts similar apparel where the fishy nature is a bit more promient. Does a fish meet the broad definition of the term - beast?
Is it fair to say that head dress is in connection or contact with the head of said chief. With respect to whatever cermenony gave rise to that photo op, is it likely that it constituted a form of intercourse? Could it conceiable approach the boundary of beastiality? So many words with so many diverse meanings, so little time to spend in coming to adequately understand their potential depth of meaning. Here is one more image of what is said to have been an ancient god - the fish god, to whom some of the ancient We The People's are said to have worshipped and or otherwise convened their own brands of intercourse over.
Some interesting other things happened in the course of this treasure hunt effort to breakdown of the terms that began this thread. No more than 10 minutes ago, dog alerted me to the presence of visitors approaching the front door. We don't get a lot of visitors, but this is Fried day. Vistors turned out to be a cute couple of young adults, a young black man well dressed in pressed slack, shirt & tie in company with a young blonde woman well also well-dressed in what to me looked like sunday-best blouse, skirt and the like. I'm estimating they were in their late teens or early twenties. Being that dog is an American Bulldog, roughly 65 pound, with a neck the size of my thigh, coupled with common conceptions conveyed by the ever-popular media airwaves - like said sparkle box, dog often comes in very handy for such moments. This young couple got out of their shiny new SUV, and while approaching the front door, noted said dog, barking. The young man smiled nervously, then spoke through the front screen door "hello, we just wanted you to hvae this". I replied "thank you. Unde the circumstances, would you just plce it under the mat?". Young man nodded anxiously, the couple spoke a hasty "Have a nice day", got back in their vehicle and slowly proceded down the neighborhood street to some other house. Just this moment I went and retrieved the single-page sheet of paper they placed under the front door mat. It bears the various images with symbols - some overt, some not, but the tell-tale calling card on the back, rear spelled out in plain english - w w w . w a t c h t o w e r . o r g
In compiling this post, there were a number of other web sites I visited. Here is just a few samples. For instance, people making their own particular use of this thing we call cyber space may as a result, for instance, be taken to using plastic-backed "money" to pay for said experience as warranted. Just to pull one name out of a bulging hat, VISA is a well known, well used vehicle for such. Here is an interesting dissertation that takes in various words of relevance, to include aforementioned beast, mark therein, number / name, and VISA.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/barcodes/words.html
Within the vast realm of this otherwise difficult to thoroughly define term "beast", there is more recent lore that suggests our high institutions of global government maintain a computer- named BEAST, in various locations around the globe having first begun in Brussels. Among the databases of information said to be housed in such computer are the country-specific identification numbers used to inventory flesh of the peoples of such nations. Some people claim that with the use of such ever-expanding databases, the controllers/operators of such actually know more about the individual than the individual themselve can remember at a moments notice. Here is a somehat serious, somewhat tounge-in-cheak dissertation that purports to debunk the notion that the concept of such computers existing, anywhere in this world, is outright silly. How silly? Apparently all one has to do is A) first know the appropriate phone number to dial in Brussels, B) dial that number, C) ask them, D) have them laugh in reply, E), case closed.
http://hardware.silicon.com/servers/0,39024647,10005304,00.htm?r=2
On a closing note, whether or not things computer can and or are being used & deployed in greater numbers to serve some ultimate conspiratorial purpose, here is a fairly simplified technical explanation of this thing that people otherwise know as Cyber Space.
http://cactus.eas.asu.edu/Partha/Columns/06-04-InternetWorks.htm
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.05 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=909146