Date:   4/12/2007 8:30:04 PM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   3,827
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=845728

1 of 3 (33%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

I would say my attempts to deflect  are invisible, immaterial and do not exist. Certainly during his medical career he helped more people than Not Doctor Clark ever has. Hulda Clark may use tools but she is using them incorrectly and they serve no purpose. Like lending a Cyclotron to a chimp, her galvanometer does nothing. It is not a diagnostic tool and she is lying by telling people that it is . She is also stealing from them by pretending to provide a diagnostic procedure that does nothing. She is a predator, taking advantage of desperate people who will pay or do anything for a cure that will never be forthcoming.

Barrett may be a jerk by trying to stifle free speech, but I trust the courts to realize this so I am not worried about his constant lawsuits. Clark does worry me, because as is evident by her book sales there are countless of gullible marks willing to throw good money for false promises. Barrett is not putting people's lives at risk, Clark is; with fake cures, fake hope, fake medicine – all for a lot of very real money. He may not be right on everything he criticizes but as far as Clark is concerned he is dead on. She is a danger.

So who is the better person? A real medical doctor that provided competent health care during his career, or a N.D (from diploma mill) who provides fake diagnostics, fake promises and fake cures. I don't know who is the better person, but I am willing to say who has done the more good. Though really how many times does she have to be exposed as a fraud. Does everyone who claims she is a fraud have to go through every piece of evidence to make this factual claim?

If you don't like emotional pleas, then do not take emotional positions. I have said it many times, you cannot use reason, facts, logic to dissuade a person from a position that they did not come to it by reason. Since Hulda relies on an emotional plea to make her case, her believers can not be approached with reason, rather they require an emotional argument. I never said Barrett was a rose, only one compared to Clark whom I hold in very low opinion. My book does not suck, you are just so emotional you have lost your ability to read.

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=845728