Re: Is there another theories regarding building 7? by #69242 ..... Conspiracy Forum
Date: 2/12/2007 6:21:00 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits: 2,608
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=834430
0 of 1 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
I got this from one of the anti-zionest links that celcius posted on the Christianity Forum . They believe in some Conspiracy theories, such that W7 was 'pulled', but that the twin towers were not. They also talk of missiles from US planes hitting the buildings.
"SOME EVENTS of September 11, 2001 are still shrouded in mystery. What happened that day at Ground Zero -- the area which held the World Trade Center complex -- has not been fully explained. An official government report headed by a number of well-known public officials has been issued, but important questions remain unanswered.
How did the Twin Towers fall? Why didn't the nation's air defense system intercept the hijacked planes? What was the chain of events that led to the collapse -- late in the afternoon -- of a third building, World Trade Center 7?
There seem to be two main views of what happened on that day. One view is that of the 9/11 Commission Report, whose authors say we simply were attacked by Islamic terrorists without warning. The other view -- mainly held by leftist Conspiracy theorists -- agrees that we were so attacked, but in addition asserts that the U.S. government knew of the attacks in advance, or even facilitated them, and exploited them in such a way as to further its own foreign policy. Both views are flawed.
...In addition to the missile hit, WTC 7 suffered severe damage to its southwest corner on floors 8 thru 18 from the falling debris of the North Tower (WTC 1). Being unstable, WTC 7 might have collapsed on its own without any assistance. However, the fall would have been toward its weakest point: the southwest corner. In order to prevent such a collapse and to save lives in the ongoing search and rescue efforts, a decision was made to "pull" the building.
Another possible reason to pull WTC 7 would have been to protect classified information contained in the government offices there. The government may have teams of demolition experts on standby for emergency situations. If a structure were damaged by fire, earthquake, or some other disaster, expert teams could arrive on the scene, place explosives in predesignated areas, and quickly bring the building down. Once the building collapsed the remains would then be taken to a secret location and all sensitive information retrieved and secured.
Some have claimed the Twin Towers also fell under controlled demolition conditions. However, this is certainly not the case. The collapse of the towers can be explained by the high speed impact of the planes and the resulting fires that weaken the steel trusses. Unlike the collapse of WTC 7, both towers fell with the debris scattered in all directions. The upper portion of the South Tower fell toward the east, destroying most of World Trade Center 4. Adjacent to the Twin Towers on the western edge of the complex was WTC 3: the Marriot Hotel. The collapse of both towers onto the hotel destroyed the entire structure, less four remaining floors. There was no controlled demolition in the collapse of the Twin Towers."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=10058
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.03 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=834430