Re: amalgam and resin filling by Aharleygyrl ..... Amalgam Debate Forum
Date: 1/26/2007 8:49:27 PM ( 17 y ago)
Hits: 15,420
URL: https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=821320
0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message. Hide votes What is this?
i know you won't like this because it doesn't say mercury causes disease. you would have to look that up separately, then put the two together and draw a conclusion.
1: Caries Res. 2001 May-Jun;35(3):163-6.
The National Public Health Institute, Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, Turku University, Turku, Finland.
We studied differences in the amounts of organic and inorganic mercury in saliva samples between amalgam and nonamalgam human study groups. The amount of organic and inorganic mercury in whole saliva was measured in 187 adult study subjects. The mercury contents were determined by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometry. The amount of organic and inorganic mercury in paraffin-stimulated saliva was significantly higher (p<0.001) in subjects with dental amalgam fillings (n = 88) compared to the nonamalgam study groups (n = 43 and n = 56): log(e) (organic mercury) was linearly related to log(e) (inorganic mercury, r(2) = 0.52). Spearman correlation coefficients of inorganic and organic mercury concentrations with the number of amalgam-filled tooth surfaces were 0.46 and 0.27, respectively. Our results are compatible with the hypothesis that amalgam fillings may be a continuous source of organic mercury, which is more toxic than inorganic mercury, and almost completely absorbed by the human intestine.
<< Return to the standard message view
fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=821320