Date:   1/7/2007 8:38:20 AM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   3,771
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=805772

Hi,

I remember someone giving me a brochure for M*******h about a year ago and in that brochure M*******h claimed that their glyconutrients wouls stimulate the body's production of stem cells by the trillions in one hour. This same brochure (put out by M*******h) said that glyconutrient supplementation was better than stem cell therapy.
It spoke of how the stem cells, once released from the bone marrow, would be scour the body for diseased and damaged tissue and differentiate into cells according to the body's need.

My question is this: If this is really true, and this is better than stem cell therapy, why has no one's scars disappeared that has been taking the M*******h products?

Everybody has at least one scar and these products have been out for 14 years! I was reading that stem cell therapy is the only treamtment that will offer any hope in the removal of scars from the skin. Every other treatment for scarring has failed. If glyconutrient supplementation is better than stem cell therapy, and all experts agree that stem cell therapy will be able to completely remove scars, then why won't glyconutrients remove scars?

It is so easy to say something works on things that cannot be empirically measured or quantified. Physical scarring of the skin is a very measurable thing, and for some reason, all of these miracle products never seem to make any change!

I wrote to M*******h about this about 5 times.

They have yet to respond to any of my questions! Boy, they really care, don't they!

It is not like they are in it for the money or anything.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=805772