Date:   1/4/2007 12:37:58 PM ( 17 y ago)
Hits:   2,746
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=803749

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

So Vulcanel, you have stocks in Phillip-Morris? Own a tobacco plantation?

You didn't like the data from other countries because it falsified your bogus ideas. Now presented with American data you arbitrarily claim that the numbers are fixed – again because they don't support you. That is a fallacy of exclusion.

Whether you look at statistics from UK, Canada, France, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Belgium, Peru, Brazil, Columbia, Argentina – all countries from which I have seen studies – the results are consistent across the world. More smoking, more lung cancer, and when smoking decreases then lung cancer follows suit. Of course if you don't believe it you should take up smoking, and get your kids to do it too – I suggest 4 pack per day.

BTW what made you think American lungs were any different that lungs from the rest of the world?

Typical of short sighted provincial thinking, you are unable to see beyond the borders. You another example of the failure of the education system. Not only did you not learn anything, they also failed to teach you to think critically and logically.

As for fluoridation, the Canadian data again tells us you are full of crap on this one too.  Other international studies too.

Had you bother to read your own sources, you'd realized they did not support your position. In fact you'd be hard pressed to find any realizable study that supports such a nonsensical assertion. So, now that you are realizing how foolish your ideas are looking to others, you start arguing about nucleophiles and substance. Another argument error comes through, the fallacy of distraction - Changing the subject.

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=803749