Date:   12/6/2006 10:47:03 PM ( 19 y ago)
Hits:   1,033
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=786851

2 of 2 (100%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

I believe the theory of evolution is 100% fraudulent...it's nothing but smoke and mirrors. There is no substance what-so-ever to it. NONE. And let me prove it.

Natural selection is THE creative force to the theory of evolution. In fact, the whole theory was dreamed up around this one concept. The thinking man would assume that a theory that has literally billions of hours of thought behind it would have a premise that was TESTED at least once! But you know what....the little theory that has hoodwinked a large part of society has a little secret...and that secret is that the chosen mechanism isn't worth a dime. And that mechanism is called natural selection.

Now see, I can call natural selection worthless, as evolutionists define it, because it truly has NEVER been tested/confirmed on animals in a controlled setting. And just like the creationists they love to ridicule for living on faith, evolutionists are also living on faith that natural selection works on the level of the organism like they claim.

So here is my challenge: To prove me wrong -- To PROVE to the world once and for all that evolution is not a fraud Science based on a fraud mechanism, please point me to ONE controlled experiment on real animals that proves that natural selection operates as advertised.

By the way, this IS science, right, Corinthian? We are not living in make-believe world on Sesame Street. Is it too much to expect that over the past 100 years that ONE controlled experiment on animals could be performed so that there would be at least a small foundation for the theory to rest on?

So what you guys need to prove to me by controlled scientific experiment is among a given population of animals that there are certain individual members of that population who are more likely to breed because they are so much more fit than the next....and obviously this would require showing that some members of a population possess traits that are not exhibited by other members.

You may also prove natural selection by proving that upon an environmental change that there are genetically superior members of a given population who are more likely to live and produce offspring while another segment of the population is unable to do so based on their "unfitness." You will need to do this by showing me a CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT that tests this concept.

This is a very simple challenge. And my prediction is that you will be able to show me nothing. Indeed, Science for the past 100 years has relied on a concept that they just don't have the guts to test. And the reason they don't have the guts to test it is because they KNOW it's a fraudulent premise.

So let's see this theory backed up by scientific proof. S

 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.01 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=786851