CureZone   Log On   Join
 

Re: Anyone know anything about jesus being in indian with monks by #42781 ..... Christianity Debate

Date:   11/19/2006 4:08:04 AM ( 18 y ago)
Hits:   3,799
URL:   https://www.curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=776063

0 of 0 (0%) readers agree with this message.  Hide votes     What is this?

If you get familiar with life and readings of Edgar Cayce , you will find the answer. I am familiar quite a bit with his work so I can tell you what I remember...

First - Edgar Cayce was a psychic, who mostly helped people with their health issues, but also did readings on other subjects. Since he was a real believer and Sunday school teacher who read the Bible once every year of his life, he also did many inspired readings on topics such as Jesus, Bible and so on.

Cayce did about 15,000 readings in his life. About 10,000 of those were health readings for individuals. They were all recorded by his stenographer and are available today. Cayce did his readings in a self induced hypnotic state. You can read the book "There Is A River" if you want to get familiar with how it all came about for him. Cayce's readings that had to do with health and past were true some 99.9% of the time. His readings connected to the future, were not so good, but even he said that it is impossible to predict the future exactly due to free will - whatever may seem likely today can be changed tomorrow by someone's actions.

In any case, Cayce came out to be wrong about 200 times in those 15,000 readings. (that doesn't mean that 200 readings were wrong, only that 200 "facts" were wrong and they were almost always connected to the future). Almost all of those readings were double checked in some way (those that could be).

Now, on to your question. In his readings about Jesus and his followers, Cayce did uncover the fact that Jesus spent his teenage years in India. He went there to study meditation. It was also uncovered that Jesus had a small circle of his pupils who were interested in all kinds of truths, and not just "basic" knowledge, and those were given the knowledge about reincarnation for instance, while others who were not open to that were not.

Just because something is not in the Bible doesn't mean it didn't happen. I am more prepared to believe a Cayce reading which has a really small chance of being wrong, especially if it gave exact same facts about something many times over, then the Bible, which unfortunately did suffer from intentional abuse and unintentional errors (in the process of being re-told and transcribed many times over). This is not to say that the Bible is wrong, or that the essence is not preserved, but even Cayce in his readings said that there were those who thought they would benefit if they edited the Bible a little bit. So parts about reincarnation were taken out as were those that refer to astrology. So now we have only "born again Christian" as a reference to reincarnation, and "there shall be stars and they shall be for signs" as a reference to astrology.
 

<< Return to the standard message view

fetched in 0.02 sec, referred by http://www.curezone.org/forums/fmp.asp?i=776063